I like the way that it looks like Homer has made his own "Stop" sign to get the truck in the right position for the wrecking ball and misspelled it as "Sop"!Antoine Doinel wrote:New trailer
The Simpsons Movie (David Silverman, 2007)
- colinr0380
- Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 8:30 pm
- Location: Chapel-en-le-Frith, Derbyshire, UK
- flyonthewall2983
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 7:31 pm
- Location: Indiana
- Contact:
- Antoine Doinel
- Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 5:22 pm
- Location: Montreal, Quebec
- Contact:
- Antoine Doinel
- Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 5:22 pm
- Location: Montreal, Quebec
- Contact:
Another trailer
- davebert
- Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 8:00 pm
- Location: NY
- Contact:
- Antoine Doinel
- Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 5:22 pm
- Location: Montreal, Quebec
- Contact:
- Lino
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 10:18 am
- Location: Sitting End
- Contact:
- domino harvey
- Dot Com Dom
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm
- Antoine Doinel
- Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 5:22 pm
- Location: Montreal, Quebec
- Contact:
I'm only bringing up the length of the film because the current episodes can barely contain my interest, let alone elicit wall to wall laughter, with it's twenty four minute run time. I'm not "talking shit" about the movie, just keeping my expectations reigned in.Lino wrote:They said the same exact thing about Snow White.
-
Napoleon
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 10:55 am
Hasn't this (film vs. current state of tv show) been raised and addressed by someone before?Antoine Doinel wrote:I'm only bringing up the length of the film because the current episodes can barely contain my interest, let alone elicit wall to wall laughter, with it's twenty four minute run time.
I never get my hopes up about any film, but it has always been rumoured that in the early seasons they 'saved' a lot of potentially good jokes for the long gestating film.
- Antoine Doinel
- Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 5:22 pm
- Location: Montreal, Quebec
- Contact:
It must be a nice thought, but I somehow doubt that the team of writers - who if it's anything like writing for any other comedy show struggle to get their best material squeezed into any given episode - secretly stockpiled the best jokes for last. According to wikipedia the script only started being written in 2001.Napoleon wrote:I never get my hopes up about any film, but it has always been rumoured that in the early seasons they 'saved' a lot of potentially good jokes for the long gestating film.Antoine Doinel wrote:I'm only bringing up the length of the film because the current episodes can barely contain my interest, let alone elicit wall to wall laughter, with it's twenty four minute run time.
- Andre Jurieu
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 7:38 pm
- Location: Back in Milan (Ind.)
On the Simpsons DVDs, the writers constantly mention that they have a stockpile of old-unused jokes that they frequently return to when working on new episodes. Maybe it's not their "best jokes" that they have been specifically saving for the film, but they have mentioned that they do often return to that material and try to incorporate it into shows they are working on. It's not inconceivable that some of the material might have worked itself into the film.Antoine Doinel wrote:It must be a nice thought, but I somehow doubt that the team of writers - who if it's anything like writing for any other comedy show struggle to get their best material squeezed into any given episode - secretly stockpiled the best jokes for last...Napoleon wrote: ... but it has always been rumoured that in the early seasons they 'saved' a lot of potentially good jokes for the long gestating film.
Also, Wikipedia might be referencing the date when the staff officially commenced working on the movie script. The ideas and jokes could be pulled from anywhere really. It's not like writers (especially not comedy writers) make certain that all their material is brand new and original. I'm sure they will borrow and repeat stuff they've used in the past.
Hell, 30 Rock blatantly ripped off a Simpsons joke a couple weeks ago.
- Andre Jurieu
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 7:38 pm
- Location: Back in Milan (Ind.)
- tryavna
- Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 8:38 pm
- Location: North Carolina
davebert wrote:a lot of it seems vaguely familiar (but hilarious)
Antoine Doinel wrote:had a couple of nice gags
Am I missing something? To me, it seemed like the same old unfunny attempts at "outrageous" humor that's been characterizing the show itself for at least the past five years.domino harvey wrote:I laughed a lot in the trailer
- davebert
- Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 8:00 pm
- Location: NY
- Contact:
The show has, in my opinion, dragged itself back to relevance over the past few years, and if theyve switched to a format thats a bit more outrageous in situation they at least squeeze a few great jokes into each episode, which is much more than can be said for the seasons of Family Guy post-return (FG vs. Simpsons on Sunday nights was never very flattering to FG in my opinion, if only because the popular DVDs rarely had to run right after where they got alot of their gags from). It's good enough that I no longer pray for the show's graceful bowout asap, vs. outright cancellation, that I did oh... 7 years ago. But that's mostly because a lot of the new writers have spent formative years watching classic Simpsons, and I think they have a great sense of the tradition.
- Cobalt60
- Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 12:39 am
So, last nights Simpsons was, of course, a piece of shit as the whole season has been. We are in the midst of the absolute worst season ever. However, there was a Bunuel reference in last nights episode and even a scene of Lisa watching Un Chien Andalou's famous razor across the eye sequance. Pointless and tacked on but a little cool none the less.
-
montgomery
- Joined: Thu Sep 15, 2005 10:02 pm
- Location: Brooklyn, NY
I agree that this season is terrible. Over the past 3 seasons, I've heard a lot of critics claim that Simpsons are on the rebound, but it seems to just get worse and worse. Having never missed an episode, I watch it to keep up the only ritual I've ever had, but god, it's getting hard. I can't imagine the film will be anything other than occasionally amusing at best, though I will continue to hope for the best. The trailer certainly did not look promising.
- jbeall
- Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 1:22 pm
- Location: Atlanta-ish
When the film comes out, I'll catch a matinee, but I'm not getting my expectations up.
Seasons 3-7 (or so) of the Simpsons were phenomenal; far and away the best television show, live or animated. But I think it jumped the shark when they started squeezing in really random celebrity spots not in service of the plot, but just because they were The Simpsons and everybody wanted to do a voice spot.
I own seasons 2-8 on dvd, but season 8 was already going downhill, and I just got season 9 on netflix and decided that it wasn't worth spending money on. <sigh>
Seasons 3-7 (or so) of the Simpsons were phenomenal; far and away the best television show, live or animated. But I think it jumped the shark when they started squeezing in really random celebrity spots not in service of the plot, but just because they were The Simpsons and everybody wanted to do a voice spot.
I own seasons 2-8 on dvd, but season 8 was already going downhill, and I just got season 9 on netflix and decided that it wasn't worth spending money on. <sigh>
- denti alligator
- Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 1:36 am
- Location: "born in heaven, raised in hell"
I think the Simpsons-went-downhill scenario is a myth. Sure, season 9 has a couple of weak episodes, but each of these still has great moments. All of the episodes I've seen from season 10-17 were hilarious. I just don't understand why everyone (and I mean EVERYONE) thinks the show took a nosedive. What, exactly, changed? I sometimes think the only reason most fans think the post-9th-season episodes are sub-par is because that's all anyone ever says about them. It's a myth. Watch the episodes and enjoy them. There's lots to enjoy.jbeall wrote:When the film comes out, I'll catch a matinee, but I'm not getting my expectations up.
Seasons 3-7 (or so) of the Simpsons were phenomenal; far and away the best television show, live or animated. But I think it jumped the shark when they started squeezing in really random celebrity spots not in service of the plot, but just because they were The Simpsons and everybody wanted to do a voice spot.
I own seasons 2-8 on dvd, but season 8 was already going downhill, and I just got season 9 on netflix and decided that it wasn't worth spending money on. <sigh>
- Antoine Doinel
- Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 5:22 pm
- Location: Montreal, Quebec
- Contact:
No, there is a reason the Simpsons took a nosedive from (approximately) season 10 onward. And it's quite simple. Homer's "stupidity" went from being naive and ignorant to indulgent. As the stories became more Homer-centric, his low IQ became something his character embraced rather than something that emerged and caused laughs depending on the situation. The humor became over-the-top, obvious and forced, creating "what-stupid-thing-will-Homer-do-next" vibe instead of the more subtle and more suprising humor of the first nine years.
I find the humor of the later seasons is overall much stupider, dialed down and the very kind of thing the show made fun of in the earlier seasons.
In my opinion, the best Simpsons episode is the one with Frank Grimes. It is the writers working at their best, with humor that is both absurd yet firmly anchored in the characters world. It had so many great touches (Homer with a signed picture of Lenny on his desk; "I live above a bowling alley and below another bowling alley"; Bart owning a factory he bought for a $1) and took it to it's logical, highly orginal conclusion. To find evidence of show much the show's writing took a swandive you don't have to look any further than the Frank Grimes Jr. "sequel" episode in which the bastard son tries to get revenge on Homer. It lacked everything the parent episode had.
I find the humor of the later seasons is overall much stupider, dialed down and the very kind of thing the show made fun of in the earlier seasons.
In my opinion, the best Simpsons episode is the one with Frank Grimes. It is the writers working at their best, with humor that is both absurd yet firmly anchored in the characters world. It had so many great touches (Homer with a signed picture of Lenny on his desk; "I live above a bowling alley and below another bowling alley"; Bart owning a factory he bought for a $1) and took it to it's logical, highly orginal conclusion. To find evidence of show much the show's writing took a swandive you don't have to look any further than the Frank Grimes Jr. "sequel" episode in which the bastard son tries to get revenge on Homer. It lacked everything the parent episode had.
- denti alligator
- Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 1:36 am
- Location: "born in heaven, raised in hell"
I simply don't see this shift, nor do I see what difference it would really make for what the show does well, if this shift were indeed noticeable.Antoine Doinel wrote:No, there is a reason the Simpsons took a nosedive from (approximately) season 10 onward. And it's quite simple. Homer's "stupidity" went from being naive and ignorant to indulgent. As the stories became more Homer-centric, his low IQ became something his character embraced rather than something that emerged and caused laughs depending on the situation. The humor became over-the-top, obvious and forced, creating "what-stupid-thing-will-Homer-do-next" vibe instead of the more subtle and more suprising humor of the first nine years.
Homer's low IQ has from the very start been central to the show. I really don't think seasons 1-9 could be called "subtle," in any way, so any apparent shift away from being "subtle" wouldn't make much of a difference.
That said, I'm looking forward to revisiting the later seasons as they become available on DVD. The episode you point to is, importantly, one from season 9.
- Antoine Doinel
- Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 5:22 pm
- Location: Montreal, Quebec
- Contact:
I think season 10 was the last sort-of consistent season, but if you look at 11 which opened with a guest spot from The Who, it really took a bad turn.denti alligator wrote:I simply don't see this shift, nor do I see what difference it would really make for what the show does well, if this shift were indeed noticeable.Antoine Doinel wrote:No, there is a reason the Simpsons took a nosedive from (approximately) season 10 onward. And it's quite simple. Homer's "stupidity" went from being naive and ignorant to indulgent. As the stories became more Homer-centric, his low IQ became something his character embraced rather than something that emerged and caused laughs depending on the situation. The humor became over-the-top, obvious and forced, creating "what-stupid-thing-will-Homer-do-next" vibe instead of the more subtle and more suprising humor of the first nine years.
Homer's low IQ has from the very start been central to the show. I really don't think seasons 1-9 could be called "subtle," in any way, so any apparent shift away from being "subtle" wouldn't make much of a difference.
That said, I'm looking forward to revisiting the later seasons as they become available on DVD. The episode you point to is, importantly, one from season 9.
I guess I can't describe adequately describe the shift from 1-10, and from 11-onward but I'm a pretty big Simpsons fan and it's definitely there. The humor in the later episodes is caked on rather than letting it - and the stories - develop organically. I can't even watch the later episodes in syndication as they are just moronic - even for the Simpsons.