The Simpsons Movie (David Silverman, 2007)
- denti alligator
- Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 1:36 am
- Location: "born in heaven, raised in hell"
They dropped the ball on this, I think. Before ad-time cut the show down to just over 20 minutes, they consistently had a main plot and a Nebengeschichte, or side plot. Now, with a whole lot of extra time, they didn't even bother to build in any side stories. What a waste of time. It was too focused on the family. A side story or two would've improved the picture greatly.
It was still fun, though.
It was still fun, though.
- flyonthewall2983
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 7:31 pm
- Location: Indiana
- Contact:
I imagine in some ways it was a testing ground for the creators to get their film legs, so to speak. If a sequel will wind up in the works, I think a lot of the mistakes that were there the first time around (and I agree with some of the criticism spoken here and elsewhere) will be vastly improved. Otherwise, it's probably one of the funniest films I've seen in a long time.
- Mr Sausage
- Has Risen from the Grave
- Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 1:02 am
- Location: Canada
- denti alligator
- Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 1:36 am
- Location: "born in heaven, raised in hell"
I did not mean "what a waste of time" in the sense of a "waste of time" for me. I meant that the makers of this film wasted the extra time they had. I thought that was clear from my post.Mr_sausage wrote:The two aren't mutually exclusive categories.tavernier wrote:So which was it?denti alligator wrote:What a waste of time.
It was still fun, though.
-
rs98762001
- Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 10:04 pm
Yup, agreed. Although the first 20 minutes were extremely funny and promising, it was all downhill from the introduction of the EPA storyline. Overall, it felt much more like the recent seasons than the classics.Gregor Samsa wrote: As for the actual movie, I didn't think it was very good. To me it felt like an extended version of an episode from the past few years. Inconsistent jokes, crass humor, forced attempts at emotion etc: Then again, I wasn't expecting much more.
- The Elegant Dandy Fop
- Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 7:25 am
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
- davebert
- Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 8:00 pm
- Location: NY
- Contact:
Emotional connections, dear sir, are why The Simpsons rise above mere animated comedy. I couldn't care less if someone on Family Guy dies or gets in marital trouble; Peter on FG has always seemed boorish, sadistic and retarded without any particular redeeming qualities. The Simpsons, on the other hand, have in some of their best episodes really illustrated what any good sitcom should be able to do--get you to care about the characters and really plow into those "awwww" moments of hard-earned reunification and genuine sweetness.
So nope, I found the sappiness perfectly exceptable. However, I'm an apologist for the film, so I guess that could be one reason.
So nope, I found the sappiness perfectly exceptable. However, I'm an apologist for the film, so I guess that could be one reason.
- The Elegant Dandy Fop
- Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 7:25 am
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
Admittedly, it works in the show. I can think of so many episodes, mostly early ones, where it works (Lisa and the Substitute episode, the one where Homer tries quitting beer, and the one where Homer and Marge meet) , but here it didn't. It came off as tacked on.davebert wrote:Emotional connections, dear sir, are why The Simpsons rise above mere animated comedy. I couldn't care less if someone on Family Guy dies or gets in marital trouble; Peter on FG has always seemed boorish, sadistic and retarded without any particular redeeming qualities. The Simpsons, on the other hand, have in some of their best episodes really illustrated what any good sitcom should be able to do--get you to care about the characters and really plow into those "awwww" moments of hard-earned reunification and genuine sweetness.
So nope, I found the sappiness perfectly exceptable. However, I'm an apologist for the film, so I guess that could be one reason.
- domino harvey
- Dot Com Dom
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm
- Highway 61
- Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 8:40 pm
Yeah, I was stunned at the sheer number of people at the theatre seeing this. Huge lines formed well over an hour before showtimes, which never happens except for Star Ward or LOTR, with dozens of people turned away because it sold out so fast. That said, I thought it was disappointing. Granted, I laughed a lot, but the gags were simply that, gags. The humor was not nearly as rewarding and sly as the golden age seasons. And the pacing was horrible. Virtually every episode from the first 8 or 9 seasons feels longer and more natural than the movie because they're just better structured, better told stories, whereas the film was simply a series of rapid-fire sketches.
- flyonthewall2983
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 7:31 pm
- Location: Indiana
- Contact:
Interview with Groening and Brooks.
- domino harvey
- Dot Com Dom
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm
I am surprised at the negative-to-mildly-tolerant response to this film here, it seems to me that a lot of lapsed fans went in with a "Prove it" attitude more than anything. I honestly believe that this is about as good as a the Simpsons movie can be. It's like the negative reaction to the Seinfeld finale, where people said it wasn't as good as a regular episode and David responded "That's because it wasn't a regular episode, it was a finale!" This isn't the same as an 87-minute episode of the series, it's a movie, and as such there are consolations and conventions that have to be made to justify it being a movie. I for one thought the action sequences, particularly the extended finale, were ingenious and delightful in their creativity, and while the film certainly had its share of misfires (the indian woman, most of the pig subplot), it felt "big" and succeeded at being a big summer blockbuster-type film and a faithful extension of the show's dynamic. I fail to see how they could have appealed to as many audiences as was required and produce anything drastically different than what was given.
Also, based on the audience, if there's one thing twelve year old girls love more than anything, it's gay jokes.
Also, based on the audience, if there's one thing twelve year old girls love more than anything, it's gay jokes.
- flyonthewall2983
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 7:31 pm
- Location: Indiana
- Contact:
I thought it was great. Best comedy I've seen in a theater in years.domino harvey wrote:I am surprised at the negative-to-mildly-tolerant response to this film here, it seems to me that a lot of lapsed fans went in with a "Prove it" attitude more than anything. I honestly believe that this is about as good as a the Simpsons movie can be.
- jbeall
- Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 1:22 pm
- Location: Atlanta-ish
I enjoyed it, especially the parts that were slightly racier than television ordinarily allowed for (Homer flipping off the citizens of Springfield, for example).flyonthewall2983 wrote:I thought it was great. Best comedy I've seen in a theater in years.domino harvey wrote:I am surprised at the negative-to-mildly-tolerant response to this film here, it seems to me that a lot of lapsed fans went in with a "Prove it" attitude more than anything. I honestly believe that this is about as good as a the Simpsons movie can be.
I don't think it reaches the heights of, say, season four, but it's a fun movie nonetheless.
- Mr Sausage
- Has Risen from the Grave
- Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 1:02 am
- Location: Canada
- cdnchris
- Site Admin
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 6:45 pm
- Location: Washington
- Contact:
- flyonthewall2983
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 7:31 pm
- Location: Indiana
- Contact:
- domino harvey
- Dot Com Dom
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm
I am betting they did have at least some other instances of language and it just ended up being one of the many deleted scenes. I am hoping for as much extra Albert Brooks as possible once the DVD comes out!
Also, I was amazed that in the three weeks since this came out, no one had spoiled the surprise Big Celebrity Guest Appearance (which I will also not spoil here) for me, as I was watching I kept wondering if they'd have a bigger name than Green Day involved and lo and behold!
Also, I was amazed that in the three weeks since this came out, no one had spoiled the surprise Big Celebrity Guest Appearance (which I will also not spoil here) for me, as I was watching I kept wondering if they'd have a bigger name than Green Day involved and lo and behold!
- flyonthewall2983
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 7:31 pm
- Location: Indiana
- Contact:
- cdnchris
- Site Admin
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 6:45 pm
- Location: Washington
- Contact:
I liked the last bit where he tells the audience if they ever see him in person don't approach himdomino harvey wrote:Also, I was amazed that in the three weeks since this came out, no one had spoiled the surprise Big Celebrity Guest Appearance (which I will also not spoil here) for me, as I was watching I kept wondering if they'd have a bigger name than Green Day involved and lo and behold!
- davebert
- Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 8:00 pm
- Location: NY
- Contact:
Until I saw the credits sequence, I was under some impression that Joe Mantegna was dead. I seem to remember some side character voice actor dying recently and I guess I attributed that to Fat Tony, but maybe I just made that whole story up? Anyone hear anything like that?
And I guess I've remained generally silent on this topic thread, but the film blew me away and as a fan there on opening night, surrounded by other fans, I haven't had a similarly satisfying cinema experience in several years. The emotional segments did not ring hollow to me, and while I agree with the general consensus that this is "the new style" of Simpsons comic tradition, I think it excelled at using the new style's strengths.
Some people just can't be satisfied, as I guess is the case with any franchise with die hard legions of fans. But I, like A.O. Scott, left happy.
And I guess I've remained generally silent on this topic thread, but the film blew me away and as a fan there on opening night, surrounded by other fans, I haven't had a similarly satisfying cinema experience in several years. The emotional segments did not ring hollow to me, and while I agree with the general consensus that this is "the new style" of Simpsons comic tradition, I think it excelled at using the new style's strengths.
Some people just can't be satisfied, as I guess is the case with any franchise with die hard legions of fans. But I, like A.O. Scott, left happy.
- Antoine Doinel
- Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 5:22 pm
- Location: Montreal, Quebec
- Contact:
I was planning on seeing this next week (and I probably still will) but part of me wants me to hold off until the DVD. The recently announced extras are damned amazing and include:
Widescreen View: View the movie in its original theatrical 2.39:1 aspect ratio.
Fullscreen View: View the movie formatted to fit your screen.
Halfscreen View: View the movie formatted to fit half your screen.
Ullman View: Recreates the movie in the style of the original Tracey Ullman Show shorts.
Animatic View: View the movie through animatic.
Storyboard View: View the movie through storyboards.
Pop-Up Plagiarism: A "Pop-Up Video"-style factoid bubble pops up every time a scene rip-offs a previous episode. (Fullscreen only)
Audio: Among the standard languages there is an option for Pig Latin.
Subtitles: Among the standard languages there is an option for Futurama Alien Alphabet
A plethora of audio commentaries including one by Rupert Murdoch.
Two secret (and probably completely silent - ha ha) commentaries: One by former Showrunners Bill Oakley and Josh Weinstein and another by Participants: Writer John Swartzwelder; Authors J.D. Salinger and Thomas Pynchon; Cartoonist Bill Watterson; Comic Book Publisher Jack Chick; The Residents
Two illustrated commentaries: One by Matt Groening, director David Silverman, and a team of assistant directors and layout artists sketch directly over the movie. Another "dirty" one in which director David Silverman draws dicks on all the characters.
Widescreen View: View the movie in its original theatrical 2.39:1 aspect ratio.
Fullscreen View: View the movie formatted to fit your screen.
Halfscreen View: View the movie formatted to fit half your screen.
Ullman View: Recreates the movie in the style of the original Tracey Ullman Show shorts.
Animatic View: View the movie through animatic.
Storyboard View: View the movie through storyboards.
Pop-Up Plagiarism: A "Pop-Up Video"-style factoid bubble pops up every time a scene rip-offs a previous episode. (Fullscreen only)
Audio: Among the standard languages there is an option for Pig Latin.
Subtitles: Among the standard languages there is an option for Futurama Alien Alphabet
A plethora of audio commentaries including one by Rupert Murdoch.
Two secret (and probably completely silent - ha ha) commentaries: One by former Showrunners Bill Oakley and Josh Weinstein and another by Participants: Writer John Swartzwelder; Authors J.D. Salinger and Thomas Pynchon; Cartoonist Bill Watterson; Comic Book Publisher Jack Chick; The Residents
Two illustrated commentaries: One by Matt Groening, director David Silverman, and a team of assistant directors and layout artists sketch directly over the movie. Another "dirty" one in which director David Silverman draws dicks on all the characters.
- davebert
- Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 8:00 pm
- Location: NY
- Contact: