Criterion and Paramount

News on Criterion and Janus Films
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
jbeall
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 1:22 pm
Location: Atlanta-ish

#176 Post by jbeall »

a.khan wrote:Yes, I wish Child's Play makes it to Criterion at some point.
Why not? If Criterion can release the "Monsters and Madmen" box... :lol:
cana7cl
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 8:44 pm

#177 Post by cana7cl »

Is Child's Play owned by Paramount? I thought it was United Artists property.
User avatar
Cinephrenic
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 6:58 pm
Location: Paris, Texas

#178 Post by Cinephrenic »

I think he is talking about the Sidney Lumet film.
User avatar
Person
Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 7:00 pm

#179 Post by Person »

Of course I am refering to Lumet's, Child's Play! My post was all about Lumet - and I even put the year of release (1972) in parentheses. But it's Daniel I'd lile to see most. I'm surprised that Paramount hasn't released after all these years. Lumet considers it one of his best films.
cana7cl
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 8:44 pm

#180 Post by cana7cl »

Of course I am refering to Lumet's, Child's Play! My post was all about Lumet - and I even put the year of release (1972) in parentheses.
Well, that makes a lot more sense to me.
User avatar
Cinephrenic
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 6:58 pm
Location: Paris, Texas

#181 Post by Cinephrenic »

I'd like to see a Criterion Don't Look Now. Expecially with a Roeg/Sutherland commentary on the film.
User avatar
miless
Joined: Sun Apr 02, 2006 1:45 am

#182 Post by miless »

Cinephrenic wrote:I'd like to see a Criterion Don't Look Now. Expecially with a Roeg/Sutherland commentary on the film.
I second this. and... a new print of The Tenant is screening in NYC soon... I can only hope this means great things!
User avatar
Cronenfly
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 4:04 pm

#183 Post by Cronenfly »

Cinephrenic wrote:I second this. and... a new print of The Tenant is screening in NYC soon... I can only hope this means great things!
GODDAMNIT!!! I just bought the vanilla edition for seven dollars...just like Polanski and Criterion to fuck with me again like this...I hope they end up in a Kafka-esque hell of their own creation trying to come up with any worthy special features for this. Oh wait... #-o
User avatar
Morbii
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2004 7:38 am

#184 Post by Morbii »

a.khan's post must have been a joke... the poster above put the year by Child's Play. Course, he can speak for himself ;)
User avatar
kaujot
Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 10:28 pm
Location: Austin
Contact:

#185 Post by kaujot »

As far as Don't Look Now, according to an e-mail Tamara sent me, Criterion has no current plans for any more Nic Roeg.
We here at Criterion love Nic Roeg. However while we do hope to get to more of his films eventually, to the best of my knowledge we don't have any plans at this time. I hope this helps, and thanks for your email!
Not sure what that means about Insignificance, though I guess the obvious choice would be that they're taking their time with those acquisitions.
User avatar
Person
Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 7:00 pm

#186 Post by Person »

kaujot wrote:As far as Don't Look Now, according to an e-mail Tamara sent me, Criterion has no current plans for any more Nic Roeg.
They will be releasing one of his insignificant films at some point in the future.
User avatar
miless
Joined: Sun Apr 02, 2006 1:45 am

#187 Post by miless »

Person wrote:
kaujot wrote:Criterion has no current plans for any more Nic Roeg.
They will be releasing one of his insignificant films at some point in the future.
hahahaha... so funny... nice play on words
User avatar
Person
Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 7:00 pm

#188 Post by Person »

In retrospect, that was a terrible piece of word-play! :oops:
User avatar
kaujot
Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 10:28 pm
Location: Austin
Contact:

#189 Post by kaujot »

Person wrote:
kaujot wrote:As far as Don't Look Now, according to an e-mail Tamara sent me, Criterion has no current plans for any more Nic Roeg.
They will be releasing one of his insignificant films at some point in the future.
I know, but Tamara didn't mention it at all, so I assume the release is a ways off.
User avatar
Via_Chicago
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 4:03 pm

#190 Post by Via_Chicago »

White Dog confirmed. Another Paramount holding goes to Criterion.
User avatar
Forrest Taft
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 12:34 am
Location: Stavanger, Norway

#191 Post by Forrest Taft »

Any chance we might get Harold and Maude from Criterion soon? Another Paramount title in desperate need of an SE, and Hal Ashby is a director who belongs in the collection.
User avatar
Antoine Doinel
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 5:22 pm
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Contact:

#192 Post by Antoine Doinel »

RobertAltman wrote:Any chance we might get Harold and Maude from Criterion soon? Another Paramount title in desperate need of an SE, and Hal Ashby is a director who belongs in the collection.
I would second Harold And Maude - with a commentary track by Wes Anderson and Bud Cort.
User avatar
Steven H
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 7:30 pm
Location: NC

#193 Post by Steven H »

Antoine Doinel wrote:
RobertAltman wrote:Any chance we might get Harold and Maude from Criterion soon? Another Paramount title in desperate need of an SE, and Hal Ashby is a director who belongs in the collection.
I would second Harold And Maude - with a commentary track by Wes Anderson and Bud Cort.
Criterion seriously needs some Ruth Gordon. I would buy a disc of Harold and Maude from them in a heartbeat, especially if Bud Cort has anything to do with its production. Speaking of Ruth Gordon, how about Rosemary's Baby? So much dirt and gossip around its "making of", and yet all we get on the R1 is a pompous (does this go without saying?) Robert Evans interview and a standard transfer (which could most definitely look better in the right hands.) I've been trying to keep myself from worrying too much about the Paramount possibilities... oh well.
User avatar
Cinephrenic
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 6:58 pm
Location: Paris, Texas

#194 Post by Cinephrenic »

They need to do Frankenheimer's Seconds. Another barebones if I remember correctly.
peerpee
not perpee
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 7:41 pm

#195 Post by peerpee »

Seconds currently has a *gorgeous* transfer with director commentary.
User avatar
Via_Chicago
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 4:03 pm

#196 Post by Via_Chicago »

peerpee wrote:Seconds currently has a *gorgeous* transfer with director commentary.
Seconded (pardon the pun). Paramount does very, very well with its Black and White catalogue.
User avatar
oldsheperd
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 9:18 pm
Location: Rio Rancho/Albuquerque

#197 Post by oldsheperd »

I believe almost all of Frankenheimer's films have commentaries on them.
User avatar
Person
Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 7:00 pm

#198 Post by Person »

oldsheperd wrote:I believe almost all of Frankenheimer's films have commentaries on them.
Of the films of his that are available on DVD, yes that is true. But a few gems are missing:

The Young Savages (1961, owned by ???)
All Fall Down (1962, owned by Warner)
The Fixer (1968, owned by Warner)
99 and 44/100% Dead (1974, owned by Fox)

I'd love to see an anamorphic SD-DVD or Blu-Ray of The Train, which is a film I get a real kick out of.
moviefan
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 12:16 am

#199 Post by moviefan »

The Extraordinary Seaman (1969) Warner --not on dvd

The Young Savages might be owned by MGM, but not sure.
User avatar
Person
Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 7:00 pm

#200 Post by Person »

The Extraordinary Seaman has the rep as a cinematic abortion, but I'd like to see it.
Post Reply