Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)
- tugboat5555
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 6:36 pm
- Location: New York, San Diego
- domino harvey
- Dot Com Dom
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm
Not a good omen for Criterion's new year if this is what they choose to "tease" us with
Last edited by domino harvey on Wed Oct 15, 2008 5:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- HerrSchreck
- Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2005 3:46 pm
Hmmm.. a pot belly in profile with three wacky party hats on top of it.
Duh. That was the most blatant hint in their short history. Henri-Georges woulda scoffed.
EDIT:
Duh. That was the most blatant hint in their short history. Henri-Georges woulda scoffed.
EDIT:
Quite frigging true. After the year that's gone by, they tease us with a third edition of a film with an already outstanding deluxe special edition "retreatment"?domino harvey wrote:Not a good omen for Criterion's new year if this is what they choose to "tease" us with.
Last edited by HerrSchreck on Wed Oct 15, 2008 5:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- domino harvey
- Dot Com Dom
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm
- Zazou dans le Metro
- Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:01 pm
- Location: In the middle of an Elyssian Field
Well it beat me.
I was thinking of the Three Amigos...... Sombreros? Bandoleros??
Sort of Constructivist artwork.
OK it was just me then.
No I got it now.. Mounties...Mounties in Bondage. Isn't that Kuchar? or a Maddin short?
I was thinking of the Three Amigos...... Sombreros? Bandoleros??
Sort of Constructivist artwork.
OK it was just me then.
No I got it now.. Mounties...Mounties in Bondage. Isn't that Kuchar? or a Maddin short?
Last edited by Zazou dans le Metro on Wed Oct 15, 2008 5:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- HerrSchreck
- Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2005 3:46 pm
Anyone else catch this?“I’ve always thought that I had a lot in common with Jean-Pierre Melville. He is a silent tiger, a desperate romantic . . . He is a master.” —John Woo
Next weeks quote from Kevin Smith:
"I always thought I had a lot in common with Orson Welles. He is a film wizard, a visual poet. He is a genius-- just like me."
- souvenir
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 4:20 pm
There are a few other actors who played fictional presidents, as well. I can think of three off the top of my head.Tom Hagen wrote:Forget the clue, I am disappointed that the contest was so easy. When two films in the collection are already about U.S. presidents, finding a third is easy. (And, for the record, thanks Oliver Stone!)
- Antoine Doinel
- Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 5:22 pm
- Location: Montreal, Quebec
- Contact:
- Via_Chicago
- Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 4:03 pm
That's great. Woo has always thought of himself as the heir apparent to Melville. Melville would have approved - if only to have actually had himself a real disciple (see this interview). In reality though, Woo is merely a pale imitator - a mediocre stylist with little of Melville's restraint or command over his themes.HerrSchreck wrote:Anyone else catch this?“I’ve always thought that I had a lot in common with Jean-Pierre Melville. He is a silent tiger, a desperate romantic . . . He is a master.” —John Woo
Next weeks quote from Kevin Smith:
"I always thought I had a lot in common with Orson Welles. He is a film wizard, a visual poet. He is a genius-- just like me."
- HerrSchreck
- Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2005 3:46 pm
Yea I've caught the ongoing tributes by Woo to Melville, but I've seen little in terms of mise en scene to associate the two of them with each other-- aside from maybe this fixation on this idea of a non-cinematic, real world masculinity. I E bring the sensibility of (what they imagine to be) a real career criminal, a genuine contract killer living on the fringes, etc, into the generally sterile world of film with it's plastic screen criminals. In reality an advertisement to more or less degree for the amount of Street Cool residing in the filmmaker himself.
But whereas Melville registers as a real master and innovator of film grammar, who can say more with a moment of silence than most filmmakers can across a decade of filmmaking, Woo's most beloved films are the precise opposite... gymnastic events with a "more is more" sensibility, hoping to cram more action into a minute of film than most action directors do across a decade of filmmaking.
Outside of that, I just think it's hokey and risky to say "I remind myself of (Insert Brilliant Artist For the Ages), who is a master."
But whereas Melville registers as a real master and innovator of film grammar, who can say more with a moment of silence than most filmmakers can across a decade of filmmaking, Woo's most beloved films are the precise opposite... gymnastic events with a "more is more" sensibility, hoping to cram more action into a minute of film than most action directors do across a decade of filmmaking.
Outside of that, I just think it's hokey and risky to say "I remind myself of (Insert Brilliant Artist For the Ages), who is a master."
-
ianungstad
- Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 1:20 am
Here is an email response I got from director David Markley about 1991:The Year that Punk Broke being on Criterion. It seems to be in the early stages for DVD development. I would love to see this documentary on the label, so hope things run smoothly with Universal. :Antoine Doinel wrote:That would be pretty cool, but I would imagine clearing the music rights for that film would be a monumental task.zedz wrote:And I guess the newsletter lends further support to the 1991: The Year Punk Broke rumour.
thanks for the message and the interest in the film. yes, I agree about Criterion being a great match, but so far there is nothing official as far as a release goes, but there is an interest there. it's far too early to say anything more, and I don't like to count chickens before the eggs hatch. I would guess this would take a little time to become a reality if all goes well with everyone involved, so keep your fingers crossed. I am naturally excited about this possibility and will keep fans posted via the 1991 TYPB myspace
- kaujot
- Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 10:28 pm
- Location: Austin
- Contact:
- TheRanchHand
- Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 7:18 am
- Location: Los Angeles
- Jean-Luc Garbo
- Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 5:55 am
- Contact:
- Magic Hate Ball
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 10:15 pm
- Location: Seattle, WA
- MyNameCriterionForum
- Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 9:27 am
Clearly you're all wrong: Those towers are built over the great pyramids of Egypt as you can plainly see; said pyramids were built by slaves ("low wages") and the towers - long since destroyed by history - were used to communicate with our extraterrestrial overlords ("high definition").
The movie is Chariots of the Gods
The movie is Chariots of the Gods

