Star Wars: Original/Prequel Trilogies & General Thread

Discuss specific films and franchises
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
Minkin
Joined: Fri Aug 07, 2009 3:13 am

Re: Star Wars Films

#151 Post by Minkin »

Tom Hagen wrote:Considerate of Lucas et al to realize a lot of people have no desire to pay for or own the prequels.
Yeah but it sounds like they will shaft people on extras if they go for the smaller sets.

Also doesn't 30 hours seems a tad light for six films that I'm sure could have days about them? (Alien box had 60 hours). I smell a "Super limited director's approved Bluray" in the works. Probably to coincide with the 3D eventual "upgrade."

At least it isn't 3D.
Last edited by Minkin on Thu Jan 06, 2011 8:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
aox
Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2008 4:02 pm
Location: nYc

Re: Star Wars Films

#152 Post by aox »

Tom Hagen wrote:Considerate of Lucas et al to realize a lot of people have no desire to pay for or own the prequels.
That is the only thing that has shocked me about this announcement. I figured it would be all or nothing.
User avatar
aox
Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2008 4:02 pm
Location: nYc

Re: Star Wars Films

#153 Post by aox »

I know I have listened to the commentaries for the prequel films (mostly helmed by Rick McCullum) and they were kind of zzzzzzz

Are the commentaries for the original films (that I assume they will port over) worth a listen?
User avatar
mfunk9786
Under Chris' Protection
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 8:43 pm
Location: Miami, FL

Re: Star Wars Films

#154 Post by mfunk9786 »

I haven't seen the originals in years, I never really responded to them as a kid. And the prequels got worse as they went along (Episode I wasn't that bad, I suppose)... but shit if this isn't going to be the Blu-ray set to own this year. What the hell - preordered.
User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:25 pm
Location: SLC, UT

Re: Star Wars Films

#155 Post by swo17 »

Just a friendly reminder--if any of you actually pay money for this through channels that will eventually make their way into George Lucas' pockets, I'm going to heckle your life like mfunk at a James Mills concert.
User avatar
aox
Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2008 4:02 pm
Location: nYc

Re: Star Wars Films

#156 Post by aox »

I thought III was the only watchable prequel. I don't think I would ever watch I or II again. Plus, let's face it: I & II were just to build a trilogy. We waited 20 years to see the events that happened in III.
User avatar
Murdoch
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 3:59 am
Location: Upstate NY

Re: Star Wars Films

#157 Post by Murdoch »

Time to pop in my pan-and-scan VHS set in an ill-conceived attempt to spite Lucas's unending stubbornness.
User avatar
mfunk9786
Under Chris' Protection
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 8:43 pm
Location: Miami, FL

Re: Star Wars Films

#158 Post by mfunk9786 »

You didn't get the letterbox one? [-X
User avatar
oldsheperd
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 9:18 pm
Location: Rio Rancho/Albuquerque

Re: Star Wars Films

#159 Post by oldsheperd »

aox wrote:I know I have listened to the commentaries for the prequel films (mostly helmed by Rick McCullum) and they were kind of zzzzzzz

Are the commentaries for the original films (that I assume they will port over) worth a listen?
I've listened to the Episode IV commentary and part of Episode V. I can't remember anything about the commentaries. Take that info any way you want.

I preordered the complete shabang. Swo17 can heckle me all he wants but I'll think twice next time I want to buy soemthing from him on half.com. :wink:
User avatar
aox
Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2008 4:02 pm
Location: nYc

Re: Star Wars Films

#160 Post by aox »

mfunk9786 wrote:You didn't get the letterbox one? [-X
When I was 14 and that set came out, I naturally assumed that Gold was better than Silver. #-o
Last edited by aox on Thu Jan 06, 2011 9:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Murdoch
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 3:59 am
Location: Upstate NY

Re: Star Wars Films

#162 Post by Murdoch »

aox wrote:
mfunk9786 wrote:You didn't get the letterbox one? [-X
When I was 14 and that set came out, I naturally assumed that Gold was better than Silver. #-o
I remember thinking "What are these black bars, why am I seeing less of the movie?" Granted I was probably ten, but still no excuse.
User avatar
oldsheperd
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 9:18 pm
Location: Rio Rancho/Albuquerque

Re: Star Wars Films

#163 Post by oldsheperd »

I was hoping to finally see the scene with Dustin Hoffman. Maybe we'll also get the lyrics that Bill Murray orginally wrote for the Star Wars theme song.
User avatar
perkizitore
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2008 7:29 pm
Location: OOP is the only answer

Re: Star Wars Films

#164 Post by perkizitore »

mfunk9786 wrote:I haven't seen the originals in years, I never really responded to them as a kid. And the prequels got worse as they went along (Episode I wasn't that bad, I suppose)... but shit if this isn't going to be the Blu-ray set to own this year. What the hell - preordered.
Wait until next Christmas, the UK set will be $50 by then! :wink:
User avatar
Tom Hagen
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2008 4:35 pm
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah

Re: Star Wars Films

#165 Post by Tom Hagen »

For those who've never heard it, Patton Oswalt gave us the last and best word on the prequels.
User avatar
aox
Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2008 4:02 pm
Location: nYc

Re: Star Wars Films

#166 Post by aox »

Tom Hagen wrote:For those who've never heard it, Patton Oswalt gave us the last and best word on the prequels.
excellent.
User avatar
knives
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 10:49 pm

Re: Star Wars Films

#167 Post by knives »

While overlong and a tad too weird I really do love the plinkett reviews over Oswalt's short take down.
User avatar
zedz
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 11:24 pm

Re: Star Wars Films

#168 Post by zedz »

mfunk9786 wrote:I haven't seen the originals in years, I never really responded to them as a kid. And the prequels got worse as they went along (Episode I wasn't that bad, I suppose)... but shit if this isn't going to be the Blu-ray set to own this year. What the hell - preordered.
Now this puzzles me (but bear in mind I've never got the appeal of these films, not even the best of them, not even when I was eight years old) - why would you be excited to own a collection of films you don't even particularly like? I can sort of understand people being fueled by the fumes of nostalgia, but if you don't even have that, what do these films have to offer?
User avatar
knives
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 10:49 pm

Re: Star Wars Films

#169 Post by knives »

It does seem like an odd reason to pre-order them, especially since only the crappy versions are going to be included.
User avatar
mfunk9786
Under Chris' Protection
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 8:43 pm
Location: Miami, FL

Re: Star Wars Films

#170 Post by mfunk9786 »

Because I suppose I ought to revisit them, and it's the best format on which to do so. It's not like I will have any trouble reselling the set if it goes badly.
User avatar
knives
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 10:49 pm

Re: Star Wars Films

#171 Post by knives »

mfunk9786 wrote: it's the best format on which to do so.
Not true. I know you haven't seen them, but the edits that will be on the Blurays are really horrendous and out of place. The whole affair is treated clumsily and with a certain laziness. The best versions of the OT is the untouched, sadly non-anamorphic, designated as extra copies on the limited edition sets as seen here. Save you a load of cash too I presume.
User avatar
matrixschmatrix
Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 3:26 am

Re: Star Wars Films

#172 Post by matrixschmatrix »

I have that set, and it's really not bad- if nothing else, there's a series of Rifftrax specifically designed for the special edition cut on that set, so you get a trio of decent movies and a trio of Mystery Science Theater fodder all in one box.
User avatar
Finch
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 9:09 pm
Location: United States

Re: Star Wars Films

#173 Post by Finch »

knives wrote:The best versions of the OT is the untouched, sadly non-anamorphic, designated as extra copies on the limited edition sets as seen here.
. Except that not only are these releases non-anamorphic but appear to be ports of the Laserdiscs and are hence unwatchable on larger screens. This is by no means an endorsement of the Blu-Ray, just to point out that those releases of the untouched originals was a very cynical move on Lucas' behalf: "You wanted them unchanged, here you go".
atcolomb
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 7:49 pm
Location: Round Lake, Illinois USA

Re: Star Wars Films

#174 Post by atcolomb »

Thank God we have the original version of Hardware Wars...suprised Lucas didn't ask Fosselius to make a special edition... :)
User avatar
knives
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 10:49 pm

Re: Star Wars Films

#175 Post by knives »

Finch wrote:
knives wrote:The best versions of the OT is the untouched, sadly non-anamorphic, designated as extra copies on the limited edition sets as seen here.
. Except that not only are these releases non-anamorphic but appear to be ports of the Laserdiscs and are hence unwatchable on larger screens. This is by no means an endorsement of the Blu-Ray, just to point out that those releases of the untouched originals was a very cynical move on Lucas' behalf: "You wanted them unchanged, here you go".
Yeah, I was trying to bleed out my disappointment in as few words as possible. I'd rather have those laserdisc ports(or VHS in the case of Return of the Jedi) than even the cleanest special edition.
Post Reply