Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

News on Criterion and Janus Films
Locked
Message
Author
User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:25 pm
Location: SLC, UT

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#1676 Post by swo17 »

andyli wrote:Image
Clues are supposed to have animals in them. How hard would it have been to make those dog collars?
AALFW
Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2010 10:32 pm

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#1677 Post by AALFW »

Correct me if I'm wrong but I seem to recall the Breathless Blu was announced very shortly after its newsletter hint... so if the trilogy is announced tomorrow there's some precedent for the shorter than usual hint-announcement gap...
User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:25 pm
Location: SLC, UT

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#1678 Post by swo17 »

There have in some cases been only a couple weeks between newsletter hint and official announcement, but it's usually more like one or two months, i.e. Three Colors will most likely be announced in July or August.
User avatar
aox
Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2008 4:02 pm
Location: nYc

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#1679 Post by aox »

I feel like a tool, but I have never seen any of them. #-o I have seen a few of his other films, but these have just never managed to come around for me.

blind buy?
User avatar
Napier
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:48 pm
Location: The Shire

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#1680 Post by Napier »

aox wrote: blind buy?
You have no idea. You'll be wondering what took you so long to see them.
User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:25 pm
Location: SLC, UT

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#1681 Post by swo17 »

Buy it or we'll blind you.
User avatar
knives
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 10:49 pm

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#1682 Post by knives »

Get it for Red if nothing else. Stylistically Blue is a Double Life retread, but the story and performance more than make up for that. White on the other hand is just good.
User avatar
The Elegant Dandy Fop
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 7:25 am
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#1683 Post by The Elegant Dandy Fop »

What about we few who do not care for Kieslowski? Am I damned into blind buying this lest ye blind me?
User avatar
Murdoch
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 3:59 am
Location: Upstate NY

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#1684 Post by Murdoch »

I'll be getting it but Dekalog's the only Kieslowski I really like. Three Colors didn't do much for me last time I saw it, I'd been wanting to revisit it though.
User avatar
jbeall
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 1:22 pm
Location: Atlanta-ish

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#1685 Post by jbeall »

The Elegant Dandy Fop wrote:What about we few who do not care for Kieslowski? Am I damned into blind buying this lest ye blind me?
Yes. If only in the hope that the extra sales will give Criterion the dough they need to acquire titles that didn't already have perfectly acceptable editions.
User avatar
Tom Hagen
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2008 4:35 pm
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#1686 Post by Tom Hagen »

Hell, just blind buy the DVDs now.
jbeall wrote:
The Elegant Dandy Fop wrote:What about we few who do not care for Kieslowski? Am I damned into blind buying this lest ye blind me?
Yes. If only in the hope that the extra sales will give Criterion the dough they need to acquire titles that didn't already have perfectly acceptable editions.
Like The Decalogue.
User avatar
Gary Gnu
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 9:50 pm

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#1687 Post by Gary Gnu »

I would guess a double-clue for Danton had it not already been released. Now, I'm in for The Headless Woman as well... So Reservoir Dogs and Headless Woman- Final Answer!
User avatar
thatobscurecharm
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 5:19 pm
Location: Northern California

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#1688 Post by thatobscurecharm »

Yesterday, I was looking at a copy of Blue at my local store and was itching to buy it. However, a little voice told me that Criterion might be releasing it and that I should be patient. Huzzah!
User avatar
HistoryProf
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 7:48 am
Location: KCK

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#1689 Post by HistoryProf »

i've only seen blue - but it was over 15 years ago....any significance to the collars in the first place?
User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:25 pm
Location: SLC, UT

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#1690 Post by swo17 »

Probably a reference to how they collared us into believing that we would get an actual hint this month.
User avatar
headacheboy
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 12:57 am

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#1691 Post by headacheboy »

Collars, Colours. Just a play on words.
User avatar
Feego
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 11:30 pm
Location: Texas

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#1692 Post by Feego »

Haha, when I first saw this, I thought it meant the entire Antoine Doinel series was coming to Blu. :oops:

Image
User avatar
Cinephrenic
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 6:58 pm
Location: Paris, Texas

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#1693 Post by Cinephrenic »

Oh, the Banana Republic catalog.
User avatar
benm
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2005 3:42 am

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#1694 Post by benm »

I found the whole trilogy to be pretty trying. Euro arthouse type fare that looks good but doesn't have that much substance. So I'd say not blind buy.
User avatar
aox
Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2008 4:02 pm
Location: nYc

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#1695 Post by aox »

I initially avoided it for the past decade, because the people that raved about it when I was getting into film were people who were 22 years old, really into Fight Club (a film I ended up being OK with), and thought Amelie (a film I ended up thinking was OK) was the best foreign film they had seen. I sort of lumped these in with them. They talked just as glowingly about this trilogy but had never even heard of Fellini. But his other films are compelling, so I have no reason to believe these won't be.
oh yeah
Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 11:45 pm

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#1696 Post by oh yeah »

If you like, say, The Double Life of Veronique, I'd think you'd like the trilogy as well. They're very similar aesthetically, though the trilogy is a good deal more accessible.
Zot!
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 4:09 am

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#1697 Post by Zot! »

benm wrote:I found the whole trilogy to be pretty trying. Euro arthouse type fare that looks good but doesn't have that much substance. So I'd say not blind buy.
What? I usually enjoy brusk dismisals of stuff, but if I can't complain about Julie and Julia, I don't think you should be able to get away with that. These are extremely well crafted films that are both entertaining and enlightening on a multitude of levels, and they are certainly not lacking in substance. I prefer the Decalogue, but these are hardly mere trifles. Please revisit and I can't imagine you wouldn't agree.
User avatar
NilbogSavant
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:15 am

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#1698 Post by NilbogSavant »

I'm still pulling for a double clue that includes Hong Sang-soo's Night and Day. Those headless women look like they could be from that one girl's sketchbook.

EDIT: Messed the title up.
Last edited by NilbogSavant on Wed Jun 15, 2011 5:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Jun-Dai
監督
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 8:34 am
Location: London, UK
Contact:

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#1699 Post by Jun-Dai »

I'm also in the camp that believes the trilogy to be overrated, and would not recommend it as a blind buy except for people that already know they like Kieslowski or seem like the sort of people that would fall in love with his films.

That's not to say that they're bad films. Beautifully shot parables with nice-looking actors, I would have no trouble watching them again, but Kieslowski's work generally feels a bit pretentious to me.

Blue I found to be the most beautiful of the three, but I only wish that Kieslowski had spared us actually having to hear the composition the film centres around, and had left it implied. It's about as boring a piece of music as could have been written for the film (IMO), but regardless, it would have been hard for anyone to write something that was up to the task the narrative gives it.
User avatar
oldsheperd
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 9:18 pm
Location: Rio Rancho/Albuquerque

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#1700 Post by oldsheperd »

They're okay but they don't live up to the hype. There is a different tone for each film. I liked White the most, it was a bit more light hearted.
Locked