Carnage (Roman Polanski, 2011)

Discuss specific films and franchises
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
Tom Hagen
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2008 4:35 pm
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah

Re: Carnage (Roman Polanski, 2011)

#2 Post by Tom Hagen »

Image

John C. Reilly looks so out of place. The last six or so years of that guy's career have made me forget that he's a good actor in roles that don't require him to be an idiot manchild.
User avatar
Brian C
I hate to be That Pedantic Guy but...
Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 3:58 pm
Location: Northwest US

Re: Carnage (Roman Polanski, 2011)

#3 Post by Brian C »

Even sometimes when he is an idiot manchild. I thought his idiot manchild schtick had run its course with the annoying Cyrus, but then I was surprised by how much I liked him in Cedar Rapids. So yeah, I'm with you - I forget how good he can be myself.
User avatar
knives
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 10:49 pm

Re: Carnage (Roman Polanski, 2011)

#4 Post by knives »

Isn't he also in We Need to Talk About Kevin? I guess this is the year where he returns to the sort of roles that made him famous in the first place.
User avatar
Gary Gnu
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 9:50 pm

Re: Carnage (Roman Polanski, 2011)

#5 Post by Gary Gnu »

Tom Hagen wrote:John C. Reilly looks so out of place. The last six or so years of that guy's career have made me forget that he's a good actor in roles that don't require him to be an idiot manchild.
Upon seeing those idiot manchild performances, it was hard for me to believe that he was actually in some P.T. Anderson films! I think he's having something of a return to form. I'm definitely anticipating this film.
User avatar
mfunk9786
Under Chris' Protection
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 8:43 pm
Location: Miami, FL

Re: Carnage (Roman Polanski, 2011)

#6 Post by mfunk9786 »

He was an idiot manchild in Cyrus? Really? I didn't get that (or the whole annoying thing) at all.
User avatar
flyonthewall2983
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 7:31 pm
Location: Indiana
Contact:

Re: Carnage (Roman Polanski, 2011)

#7 Post by flyonthewall2983 »

I liked his more comedic perfomances as of late*, but it will be nice seeing him getting into more complicated roles.

*Best humorous thing he ever did was break into "The Night Chicago Died" with Conan during an interview on Late Night from Chicago.
Last edited by flyonthewall2983 on Sat Jul 30, 2011 1:26 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Professor Wagstaff
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 3:27 am

Re: Carnage (Roman Polanski, 2011)

#8 Post by Professor Wagstaff »

Anyone else see God of Carnage on the stage? I caught the New York production and thought James Gandolfini was doing the best work I've seen from him, so John C. Reilly's casting in that role has definitely been the hardest sell for me. I keep trying to imagine Reilly playing angry that isn't in the key of a child's temper tantrum.
User avatar
Tom Hagen
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2008 4:35 pm
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah

Re: Carnage (Roman Polanski, 2011)

#9 Post by Tom Hagen »

I don't mean to sound too hard on Reilly as a comic performer. His role in Boogie Nights was almost entirely comic relief, and it is infinitely rewatachable.

As for the film, I'm very excited. I've enjoyed the late career Polanski renaissance almost as much as anything from his youth.
User avatar
tavernier
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 11:18 pm

Re: Carnage (Roman Polanski, 2011)

#10 Post by tavernier »

Professor Wagstaff wrote:Anyone else see God of Carnage on the stage? I caught the New York production and thought James Gandolfini was doing the best work I've seen from him, so John C. Reilly's casting in that role has definitely been the hardest sell for me. I keep trying to imagine Reilly playing angry that isn't in the key of a child's temper tantrum.
Either the Broadway (top) or London (bottom) casts would be fine with me

Image

Image
User avatar
Jeff
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:49 am
Location: Denver, CO

Re: Carnage (Roman Polanski, 2011)

#11 Post by Jeff »

User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: Carnage (Roman Polanski, 2011)

#12 Post by domino harvey »

I was looking forward to this but boy that looks awful
User avatar
knives
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 10:49 pm

Re: Carnage (Roman Polanski, 2011)

#13 Post by knives »

The trailer is cut really badly, but I'm getting the sense that the film isn't like that.
User avatar
The Elegant Dandy Fop
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 7:25 am
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Re: Carnage (Roman Polanski, 2011)

#14 Post by The Elegant Dandy Fop »

It's just a poorly cut trailer. I'm hope the actual film isn't as cheesy or stilted. Polanski has been long enough to know what constitutes as good editing and acting, so I'm sure it's fine. They just make it look like a quirky comedy because I'm sure it might be tricky to market.

Anyways, has anyone mentioned this is another Polanski film in an apartment?
User avatar
colinr0380
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 8:30 pm
Location: Chapel-en-le-Frith, Derbyshire, UK

Re: Carnage (Roman Polanski, 2011)

#15 Post by colinr0380 »

domino harvey wrote:I was looking forward to this but boy that looks awful
You just don't understand it! *stands in middle of thread shouting, pulling funny faces and dancing around until domino puts my mobile phone in a jug of water at which point I leave in a huff, throwing a bunch of daffodils at knives on the way out*

(I'm still looking forward to it though! For some reason it makes me think of Abigail's Party - or, more appropriately for Polanski, Death and the Maiden!)
User avatar
hearthesilence
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 8:22 am
Location: NYC

Re: Carnage (Roman Polanski, 2011)

#16 Post by hearthesilence »

Saw Carnage at a preview - I've only skimmed a few brief reviews, and from what I can tell, there's some debate over whether or not this film is too stagebound. A concern for any adaptation of a single-location play, but Roman Polanski has made a few damn good films that were more-or-less confined to one location.

I thought it was a mixed bag - the visual elements were good, in terms of blocking, editing, framing, Polanski does not disappoint. But nearly everything about the movie (every thought, every little action, every dramatic development) is driven by the screenplay's wall-to-wall dialogue. In retrospect, I think they should've sliced out half the dialogue and just let the facial expressions or the blocking already in place do the work. Even the rhythm of the words felt stagebound, and everything felt like it was being projected out at the audience.

Anyway, the cast was solid, but Reilly could've been better. (I could see James Gandolfini being far more interesting and appropriately more intimidating.) I liked Winslet the best, who wasn't a favorite in years past, but she's really gotten better with age, not to mention more radiant (least IMO).
User avatar
R0lf
Joined: Tue May 19, 2009 11:25 am

Re: Carnage (Roman Polanski, 2011)

#17 Post by R0lf »

The trailer I saw in front of my movie tonight removed all mention of Roman Polanski.

When the trailer ended - ACADEMY AWARD WINNING Jodie Foster, ACADEMY AWARD WINNING Kate Winslet, ACADEMY AWARD WINNING Christoph Waltz, ACADEMY AWARD NOMINATED John C. Reilly it really made him seem like the elephant in the room with his five Oscar nods.
User avatar
aox
Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2008 4:02 pm
Location: nYc

Re: Carnage (Roman Polanski, 2011)

#18 Post by aox »

I saw a late run of the play a few years ago in NYC with Jeff Daniels and Lucy Liu and it was fantastic. Had no idea Polanski was making this. I am excited despite the so-so trailer.
Jack Phillips
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2007 6:33 am

Re: Carnage (Roman Polanski, 2011)

#19 Post by Jack Phillips »

hearthesilence wrote: I thought it was a mixed bag - the visual elements were good, in terms of blocking, editing, framing, Polanski does not disappoint. But nearly everything about the movie (every thought, every little action, every dramatic development) is driven by the screenplay's wall-to-wall dialogue. In retrospect, I think they should've sliced out half the dialogue and just let the facial expressions or the blocking already in place do the work. Even the rhythm of the words felt stagebound, and everything felt like it was being projected out at the audience.
I agree, although the film is only 80 minutes long; start cutting lines and you'll end up with a short.

Something that might work on stage but didn't work at all in the film were the attempts by the one couple to leave and the ridiculous reasons they found to stay. At such points I would think, Where's a Spanish surrealist when you need him?
User avatar
mfunk9786
Under Chris' Protection
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 8:43 pm
Location: Miami, FL

Re: Carnage (Roman Polanski, 2011)

#20 Post by mfunk9786 »

Luis Buñuel would be proud of this breakdown of human decency into a manic, drunken mess. Outside of Jodie Foster's rather embarrassing overacting at certain points, the performances are solid, and the film really does feel like it was shot in 80 minutes: The momentum of the picture is its strongest asset - we're driven through it without any of the winking or showing off that lesser directors might engage in. This is one of the reasons the cinema exists: Would you rather see this play performed by your aunt at the local firehouse, or by this cast under the direction of Roman Polanski? One of the best films of the year by default for sheer mercy and convenience.
User avatar
knives
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 10:49 pm

Re: Carnage (Roman Polanski, 2011)

#21 Post by knives »

Oh yes, I don't think Polanski has the care to do a major work again, but as long as he's at least doing these very fun and fascinating throwaways it's hard to complain.
Post Reply