Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol. 4

News on Criterion and Janus Films
Locked
Message
Author
User avatar
SamLowry
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2011 7:14 pm
Location: California

Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.

#151 Post by SamLowry »

As I'm sure you know, Fellini's La dolce vita has already been released (and re-released) by Koch Lorber with a small nation-state's worth of special features.
The Koch Lorber release, while not bad, is rather unexceptional..It's a 3 hour widescreen movie on a single dvd (which has either aspect ratio or letterboxing issues)..and that nation-state must be so small it's not yet identifiable to Google Earth. The new restoration adds 10 minutes to the Koch Lorber print (not to mention it's a restoration from the original Italian negative) and the whole porno cum rights ownership lawsuit/s thing prevented a 50th anniversary theatrical/blu ray release. So now that Paramount may have ownership (it's listing it on its website) & now that Paramount may have made a deal with Criterion for Harold & Maude and Rosemary's Baby (as well as other titles), it stands to reason that one of the most requested films for Criterion to release (as well as the companion piece to 8 1/2) might be included in a new Paramount deal...
Lewis' La dolce vita is a no-go too: no one wants to hear commentary on their porno.
As far as Criterion releasing classic porno, porno based on classic World cinema titles, or possible cult hybrids thereof, you should have no worries, Criterion only releases pornos by Pasolini, Oshima or directors pretending to be Andy Warhol.
Volta
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2011 11:31 pm

Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.

#152 Post by Volta »

RobertAltman wrote:Wasn't Gangs of New York butchered by the Weinsteins? Perhaps Scorsese and Criterion are bringing out the director's cut?
I'm trying to think of an iteration of that movie that would be interesting.... I'm blanking.... :-k
User avatar
aox
Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2008 4:02 pm
Location: nYc

Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.

#153 Post by aox »

RobertAltman wrote:
foofighters7 wrote:5 Lines= The Five Points = Gangs of New York

Mostly joking.
Wasn't Gangs of New York butchered by the Weinsteins? Perhaps Scorsese and Criterion are bringing out the director's cut?
I think Scorsese has too much pride to let this happen. He has claimed the theatrical cut is 'his' final cut.
User avatar
bringmesomechemicals
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2010 8:21 pm

Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.

#154 Post by bringmesomechemicals »

If the feature at the center of the picture is representing the rock in Pina, it would be the first 3D film for the collection. Perhaps the five lines in the drawing are meant to show depth, representing the third dimension.
User avatar
knives
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 10:49 pm

Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.

#155 Post by knives »

It would actually be the second 3D film to enter the collection.
User avatar
jedgeco
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 3:28 pm

Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.

#156 Post by jedgeco »

aox wrote:
RobertAltman wrote:
foofighters7 wrote:5 Lines= The Five Points = Gangs of New York
Wasn't Gangs of New York butchered by the Weinsteins? Perhaps Scorsese and Criterion are bringing out the director's cut?
I think Scorsese has too much pride to let this happen. He has claimed the theatrical cut is 'his' final cut.
Scorsese did circulate a VHS to some friends of his longer, "preferred" cut, but I think that Scorsese's too professional (for lack of a better term) to get into a public spat with his producers/financiers.

See this for a discussion of the longer cut.
User avatar
matrixschmatrix
Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 3:26 am

Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.

#157 Post by matrixschmatrix »

Keep in mind that's from Jeffrey Wells, whose authority is questionable to say the least.
User avatar
jedgeco
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 3:28 pm

Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.

#158 Post by jedgeco »

matrixschmatrix wrote:Keep in mind that's from Jeffrey Wells, whose authority is questionable to say the least.
Yeah, but Wells wrote it back when he used to do some actual reporting, and before blogging turned him crazy, so I have no reason to doubt that the VHS of the workprint existed (plus, there's screencaps). Whether it's better than the theatrical version, I have no opinion.
User avatar
bringmesomechemicals
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2010 8:21 pm

Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.

#159 Post by bringmesomechemicals »

I was thinking that maybe they were actually going to release a 3-D disc, rather than just releasing a film that had been shown in 3-D, like Flesh for Frankenstein.
User avatar
starmanof51
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2004 7:28 am
Location: Seattleish
Contact:

Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.

#160 Post by starmanof51 »

duck duck wrote:The five lines make lanes making "Five Corners". Image has Handmade Films and put out crap editions.
Well, it was one of their laser releases, and I do tend to think they have an itch to recreate their laser catalog to the greatest extent possible. It's a worthwhile thought.
duck duck
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 3:45 am

Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.

#161 Post by duck duck »

Ok, now it's time to bitch about no Chaplin clues in the New Years picture.
User avatar
jwd5275
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 4:26 pm
Location: SF, CA

Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.

#162 Post by jwd5275 »

What? You wanted another clue for the already hinted Gold Rush taking up space...?
duck duck
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 3:45 am

Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.

#163 Post by duck duck »

No, a light bulb, a blind lady, or a fat drunk guy would have been fine. Or just a basket of flowers.
User avatar
Cinephrenic
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 6:58 pm
Location: Paris, Texas

Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.

#164 Post by Cinephrenic »

We probably just get another two Chaplin this year... Gold Rush and City Lights.
Volta
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2011 11:31 pm

Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.

#165 Post by Volta »

I'm pretty sure we're due to see Limelight before City Lights. (That is if Criterion is releasing them in order of their appearance in the previous MK2 set.... It may be a coincidence so far.)
User avatar
SamLowry
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2011 7:14 pm
Location: California

Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.

#166 Post by SamLowry »

Perhaps the five lines in the drawing are meant to show depth, representing the third dimension.
Or perhaps the lines are demarcating the breaking of commandments in 2's.....on second thought, the lines seem very connected to the cars...maybe the violation of the commandments are happening in the cars, as there are 10 cars....but why would Criterion put 6 episodes on 1 disc, 2 on another, 1 each on discs 3 & 4 and none on 5.....Probably because Criterion will not only release the complete Decalogue, but also the corresponding movies in the box set and the 5th disc will be all extras.
Jgh8xxx
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2011 4:41 am

Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.

#167 Post by Jgh8xxx »

Has anyone suggested the Dardennes' "La promesse" as the car transport clue from the New Years Newsletter? A car transport plays a significant role in the plot, and on the 2012 drawing Criterion posted to Facebook looking at the schedule people seemed to see it as one of the listed titles. Also, we know Mulvaney has said that there are some definite possibilities for the Dardennes in the collection. Also, I'm not sure who holds the rights, but I seem to remember something about it being a company Criterion is known to have a partnership with. This seems to me definitive evidence that the car transport in the drawing suggests La promesse by the Dardennes.
User avatar
zedz
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 11:24 pm

Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.

#168 Post by zedz »

By "definitive" do you mean "circumstantial"? Otherwise, interesting suggestion.
User avatar
Jeff
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:49 am
Location: Denver, CO

Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.

#169 Post by Jeff »

I'm fairly certain that Criterion has the rights to La Promesse, so I suppose that probably is what the clue is pointing to. So much for my Wenders theory.
User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:25 pm
Location: SLC, UT

Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.

#170 Post by swo17 »

Kid with a Bike is probably also a possibility.
User avatar
foofighters7
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 3:27 am
Location: Local

Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.

#171 Post by foofighters7 »

I asked about 'La Promesse' about a year ago I think, but never heard anything back from JM.

Rosetta and 'La Promesse' need released, especially 'Rosetta' since it's MIA on R1. 'La Promesse' has been OOP for quite awhile as well.

I was mostly joking with the GONY possibility since I also doubt Scorsese would want to release a longer cut/directors cut since he seems to have said what is there is there as far as the film, but it would be interesting.

I wasn't joking as much about 'An Inconvenient Truth'. The Iceberg thing seems to be melting which made me think of AIT. I don't know how they could expand on the current release but seemed plausible.
User avatar
zedz
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 11:24 pm

Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.

#172 Post by zedz »

Re: the 'iceberg' - I have to go with the 'wet rock' = Pina theory, since if they wanted to indicate an iceberg, they'd put it in the ocean. Icebergs don't end up beached like whales.
User avatar
foofighters7
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 3:27 am
Location: Local

Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.

#173 Post by foofighters7 »

yeah you're prob right.
chrisandy
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2008 4:37 am

Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.

#174 Post by chrisandy »

foofighters7 wrote:I wasn't joking as much about 'An Inconvenient Truth'. The Iceberg thing seems to be melting which made me think of AIT. I don't know how they could expand on the current release but seemed plausible.
Almost positive the iceberg theory has been proven as A Night to Remember (which already has a release date)....
Calvin
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2011 3:12 pm

Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.

#175 Post by Calvin »

Just had a brainwave that the seagulls could signify Victor Erice's El Sur. The house is nicknamed the seagull, probably due to the wind vane...

Image
Locked