Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol. 4

News on Criterion and Janus Films
Locked
Message
Author
Chaney_TUX
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 2:11 am
Location: Tehran

Re: Who Chooses Criterion Titles?

#1976 Post by Chaney_TUX » Tue Nov 27, 2012 2:10 pm

Ah! Wilderness...
funny thing about Haxan is that there's a random not-relevant shot about Persian witches in the film!

btw, I thought this forum/board would be more sophisticated than IMDb.

User avatar
MichaelB
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:20 pm
Location: Worthing
Contact:

Re: Who Chooses Criterion Titles?

#1977 Post by MichaelB » Tue Nov 27, 2012 2:14 pm

Chaney_TUX wrote:btw, I thought this forum/board would be more sophisticated than IMDb.
Well, you thought wrong. Clearly.

Chaney_TUX
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 2:11 am
Location: Tehran

Re: Who Chooses Criterion Titles?

#1978 Post by Chaney_TUX » Tue Nov 27, 2012 2:15 pm

Obviosuly.

User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 10:25 am
Location: SLC, UT

Re: Who Chooses Criterion Titles?

#1979 Post by swo17 » Tue Nov 27, 2012 2:34 pm

I always hate it when I post a serious question on IMDb and the only responses I can get are quippy references to 100-year old films. When will those guys grow up?

User avatar
MichaelB
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:20 pm
Location: Worthing
Contact:

Re: Who Chooses Criterion Titles?

#1980 Post by MichaelB » Tue Nov 27, 2012 2:39 pm

swo17 wrote:I always hate it when I post a serious question on IMDb and the only responses I can get are quippy references to 100-year old films.
90-year-old films, please. We have standards round here.

User avatar
Professor Wagstaff
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 11:27 pm

Re: Who Chooses Criterion Titles?

#1981 Post by Professor Wagstaff » Tue Nov 27, 2012 5:12 pm

I imagined the process to be something like this, with Peter Becker in charge of the chicken while Mulvaney plays kazoo.

User avatar
zedz
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 7:24 pm

Re: Who Chooses Criterion Titles?

#1982 Post by zedz » Tue Nov 27, 2012 5:17 pm

I believe it's been well established that Criterion closely monitors this forum, waits until some forum member announces that they've finally tracked down a shitty edition of a long out-of-print title and paid through the nose for it, then they announce a newly restored BluRay of the film the following month.

Otherwise, they select directors' names from a Scrabble set missing the letters R, I, V, E and T.

Truer answer: there's a bunch of producers, a bunch of well-established industry contacts (primarily Janus, but also IFC), a long, slow pipeline of ongoing restorations that they'll be keeping their eye on, the vagaries of personal taste, the realities of the market, the nightmare of scheduling, and very occasional bolts of inspiration in the form of consumer suggestions or stray finds. Within those constraints there isn't a lot of wiggle room. Criterion can't just magic up good elements for any desired title, and some rights are unnegotiable or too legally tangled to be economically feasible.

User avatar
barryconvex
billy..biff..scooter....tommy
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2012 10:08 pm
Location: NYC

Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.

#1983 Post by barryconvex » Wed Nov 28, 2012 11:57 pm

...some rights are unnegotiable or too legally tangled to be economically feasible.
can you give any examples of these? would one of them be Out:1?

ianungstad
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 9:20 pm

Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.

#1984 Post by ianungstad » Thu Nov 29, 2012 12:06 am

Has anyone heard if Palisades-Tartan has lost the rights to their Park Chan Wook films? The dvds and blurays for Oldboy/Lady Vengeance/Sympathy for Mr.Vengeance all seem to be out of print on Amazon. (Some of the dvds are available from 3rd party retailers). Oldboy is still available for streaming but I figure that won't be for much longer. Tartan filed for bankruptcy back in 2008 and the library was sold on the cheap to Palisades Media. The new company may not have the resources or desire to renew the rights if Criterion, Shout, Kino, etc. went after these films. The director is certainly much more known now than when these were new releases.

Also, it looks like Anchor Bay took Dawn of the Dead off their site sometime in the last week, so they've definitely lost the rights to all their Romero films. It's likely that Scream picked this up since they are reissuing Day of the Dead (but it's worth noting that the films come from different licensors.) Cliff says they don't have it but he could just be playing coy since they might not want to announce it this early. One of the major studios might have also nabbed it since Zombies are so popular at the moment. A Criterion would be nice but existing releases of this film have been pretty stacked. It will be interesting to see which studio/label landed the rights.

User avatar
tenia
Ask Me About My Bassoon
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 11:13 am

Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.

#1985 Post by tenia » Thu Nov 29, 2012 2:38 am

barryconvex wrote:
...some rights are unnegotiable or too legally tangled to be economically feasible.
can you give any examples of these? would one of them be Out:1?
I understood it is the case.
In France, Fanny and Alexander have always been a nightmare to licence, that's why we still don't have even a DVD edition of it, with Gaumont only planning to release the theater cut and the TV cut next year (finally !).

Adam
Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2007 8:29 pm
Location: Los Angeles CA
Contact:

Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.

#1986 Post by Adam » Thu Nov 29, 2012 3:15 am

I received a newsletter from the Flaherty Seminar, named for Robert Flaherty. In it is this:

"Criterion Collection Partnership - We recently negotiated our distribution agreement with Criterion to re-release Nanook of the North and Louisiana Story on DVD. Look for these films along with many exciting special features in 2013!"

That is the full information provided.

Seems pretty official, if limited in info.

User avatar
jwd5275
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 12:26 pm
Location: SF, CA

Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.

#1987 Post by jwd5275 » Thu Nov 29, 2012 11:12 am

Let's hope we get Man of Aran and Tabu too...

User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 10:25 am
Location: SLC, UT

Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.

#1988 Post by swo17 » Thu Nov 29, 2012 12:11 pm

Hopefully they are just being informal when they say DVD and not Blu-ray. If ever a film cried out for hi-def treatment, it's Louisiana Story.

User avatar
htshell
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2011 4:15 pm

Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.

#1989 Post by htshell » Thu Nov 29, 2012 12:29 pm

Nanook was presented in an HD transfer at the Flaherty Seminar, so that's a safe bet.

User avatar
zedz
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 7:24 pm

Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.

#1990 Post by zedz » Thu Nov 29, 2012 3:39 pm

swo17 wrote:Hopefully they are just being informal when they say DVD and not Blu-ray. If ever a film cried out for hi-def treatment, it's Louisiana Story.
The prospect of Louisiana Story on BluRay (and I can't imagine Criterion would pass up that opportunity), along with a sampling of the hours of available outtakes, is enough to send my head spinning.

User avatar
HistoryProf
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 3:48 am
Location: KCK

Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.

#1991 Post by HistoryProf » Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:20 pm

zedz wrote:
swo17 wrote:Hopefully they are just being informal when they say DVD and not Blu-ray. If ever a film cried out for hi-def treatment, it's Louisiana Story.
The prospect of Louisiana Story on BluRay (and I can't imagine Criterion would pass up that opportunity), along with a sampling of the hours of available outtakes, is enough to send my head spinning.
I just gasped reading that post. holy cow. I mean...wow. and within the year? This with the Medium Cool hint is the best 24 hours not around the 15th of the month in a long long time.

Throw in a Rouch box set of his ethnographic work and I will officially know what heaven looks like.

stroszeck
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2005 10:42 pm

Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.

#1992 Post by stroszeck » Sat Dec 08, 2012 11:25 pm

Anyone know what the chances are that we will ever see Patrick Dewaere in some capacity in the collection? I just finished watching his manic, pitch-perfect performance in Serie Noire and have to say, in spite of his untimely death at 35, his short but amazing body of work should be more recognized, both in Europe and, especially, in America.

Arthur House
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 3:20 pm

Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.

#1993 Post by Arthur House » Sun Dec 09, 2012 1:36 am

I'd like to second that. I recently celebrated my birthday by taking some friends to a rep screening of Get Out Your Handkerchiefs. The problem is, I just checked up on some of Dewaere's biggest titles on IMDB, and it appears Studio Canal owns or at least distributes many of them--Serie Noire, Get Out Your Handkerchiefs & Beau Pere to name three.

Claude Miller's The Best Way To Walk is with MK2, and saw a now OOP dvd release via Fox Lorber. So it could be in play perhaps?

User avatar
zedz
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 7:24 pm

Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.

#1994 Post by zedz » Sun Dec 09, 2012 3:06 pm

Arthur House wrote:Get Out Your Handkerchiefs
Well, there aren't too many other pro-pedophilia films in the collection, so it'd fill a niche - I guess. :?

bamwc2
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 11:54 am

Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.

#1995 Post by bamwc2 » Sun Dec 09, 2012 4:34 pm

zedz wrote:
Arthur House wrote:Get Out Your Handkerchiefs
Well, there aren't too many other pro-pedophilia films in the collection, so it'd fill a niche - I guess. :?
No, that niche belongs squarely to Janus's David Hamilton acquisitions. Off the top of my head though, there doesn't seem to be much of a shortages with Arabian Nights, Harold & Maude (Depending on how old Harold is), and Murmur of the Heart. Other films like Salo, My Life as a Dog, and The Ice Storm all feature underage sexuality, but it would be a stretch to call any of those an endorsement.

For what it's worth though, Get Out Your Handkerchiefs is a fine film and I'm glad to have the Criterion LD. If ever given the chance they'd probably re-release it.

User avatar
Gregory
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 4:07 pm

Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.

#1996 Post by Gregory » Sun Dec 09, 2012 6:06 pm

bamwc2 wrote:
zedz wrote:
Arthur House wrote:Get Out Your Handkerchiefs
Well, there aren't too many other pro-pedophilia films in the collection, so it'd fill a niche - I guess. :?
No, that niche belongs squarely to Janus's David Hamilton acquisitions. Off the top of my head though, there doesn't seem to be much of a shortages with Arabian Nights, Harold & Maude (Depending on how old Harold is), and Murmur of the Heart. Other films like Salo, My Life as a Dog, and The Ice Storm all feature underage sexuality, but it would be a stretch to call any of those an endorsement.
For what it's worth though, Get Out Your Handkerchiefs is a fine film and I'm glad to have the Criterion LD. If ever given the chance they'd probably re-release it.
Harold is definitely not underaged. Aside from that, no surprise that many films will continue to reflect the reality that teenagers tend to have some form of sexuality.

User avatar
Lowry_Sam
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2010 3:35 pm
Location: San Francisco, CA

Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.

#1997 Post by Lowry_Sam » Mon Dec 10, 2012 2:58 am

bamwc2 wrote:
zedz wrote:
Arthur House wrote:Get Out Your Handkerchiefs
Well, there aren't too many other pro-pedophilia films in the collection, so it'd fill a niche - I guess. :?
No, that niche belongs squarely to Janus's David Hamilton acquisitions. Off the top of my head though, there doesn't seem to be much of a shortages with Arabian Nights, Harold & Maude (Depending on how old Harold is), and Murmur of the Heart
..and don't forget Die Blechtrommel, If..., My Own Private Idaho, & Fat Girl. Now if only Kids, Careful He Might Hear You, Europa, Europa, Happiness, American Beauty, and Lolita would be added to the collection...

User avatar
Brian C
I hate to be That Pedantic Guy but...
Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 11:58 am
Location: Chicago, IL

Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.

#1998 Post by Brian C » Mon Dec 10, 2012 3:39 am

If.... is pro-pedophilia? What did I miss during that one? Maybe this discussion has just gotten really stupid?

And if we do decide to keep being stupid ... I haven't seen most of the others on that list, but can we please distinguish between the lust for a high school senior in American Beauty and actual pedophilia? The word has a meaning, look it up.

User avatar
knives
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 6:49 pm

Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.

#1999 Post by knives » Mon Dec 10, 2012 4:35 am

If... is probably the closest to accurate mentioned yet as a subplot concerns a relationship between an older boy and a decidedly prepubescent boy though I still wouldn't call it pro-pedophilia.

User avatar
Brian C
I hate to be That Pedantic Guy but...
Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 11:58 am
Location: Chicago, IL

Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.

#2000 Post by Brian C » Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:12 am

Yes, perhaps I'm really dense, but I read If.... as a rather scathing attack on boarding school culture, not as a celebration of it. People here are conflating the presence of certain content with an endorsement of said content.

Locked