Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

News on Criterion and Janus Films
Locked
Message
Author
User avatar
justeleblanc
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 10:05 pm
Location: Connecticut

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#2451 Post by justeleblanc »

mfunk9786 wrote:
justeleblanc wrote:Repo Man? It looks more like Conner's "A Movie" to me.
It's funny that after that screenshot was posted, people are still guessing.
Shut it, you.
User avatar
Cold Bishop
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 1:45 am
Location: Portland, OR

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#2452 Post by Cold Bishop »

ryannichols7 wrote:so is it too much to ask for a month of Repo Man with an upgrade of Walker, which would also feature Pontecorvo/Brando's Burn! (which, if you don't know, is about Walker)? that would be absolutely fantastic but I know I can dream.
There's absolutely no way that Burn! ends up as an "extra", if for no reason that an eventual release would have to include both cuts (unless the English track magically appears, although by last estimation it was never looped, as the decision to shorten the film for the U.S. preceded dubbing).
User avatar
zedz
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 11:24 pm

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#2453 Post by zedz »

I was just about to post the same thing. In any scenario, Burn! outguns Walker commercially.
User avatar
ryannichols7
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2012 6:26 pm

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#2454 Post by ryannichols7 »

no no, i mean be its own spine obviously. no way that movie could be an extra, it deserves its own set of extras.

kinda like how they upgraded If and released the Vigo set in the same month, as a theme kind of thing.
User avatar
whaleallright
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 4:56 am

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#2455 Post by whaleallright »

"Bruce Conner films are never, ever coming to commercial DVD or Blu-ray."

--I know that Conner's estate has been prickly about distribution of his films, but why would you say this? Simply because of clearance issues?
Thomas Dukenfield
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2010 10:42 pm

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#2456 Post by Thomas Dukenfield »

jonah.77 wrote:"Bruce Conner films are never, ever coming to commercial DVD or Blu-ray."

--I know that Conner's estate has been prickly about distribution of his films, but why would you say this? Simply because of clearance issues?
There is a DVD that was sold to schools and that you can buy at art galleries.

It's probably just a situation where his catalog is only sold or lended to art galleries and schools, possibly just because it is more financially viable, although maybe Conner specifically forbid his estate to ever release a conventional commercial DVD of any of his movies.
duck duck
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 3:45 am

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#2457 Post by duck duck »

The current Sid and Nancy Blu is fairly sad extras wise...
Who owns Repo Man?
User avatar
flyonthewall2983
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 7:31 pm
Location: Indiana
Contact:

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#2458 Post by flyonthewall2983 »

Universal, right?
User avatar
willoneill
Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 2:10 pm
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#2459 Post by willoneill »

The DVD was definitely Universal, and the MoC bluray says Universal.
User avatar
cdnchris
Site Admin
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 6:45 pm
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#2460 Post by cdnchris »

And I'm pretty sure the Anchor Bay DVD I had mentioned Universal.
ianungstad
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 1:20 am

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#2461 Post by ianungstad »

It says Focus Features right on the front cover.
User avatar
whaleallright
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 4:56 am

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#2462 Post by whaleallright »

Actually there was a DVD of numerous Conner films that was released in a limited (and very expensive) edition, and which you can track down on various torrent sites. So Conner or his estate don't seem to object to distributing his films on DVD. A poster earlier in this thread made a strong statement about his films never being distributed on "commercial" DVD (presuming he means wide release) and I was wondering if s/he has some specific knowledge of his estate's intentions to back this up.

Because I cannot imagine a worthier video project than collecting all of Conner's films on one Blu-Ray.
User avatar
htshell
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2011 8:15 pm

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#2463 Post by htshell »

I'm aware of that DVD. It's prohibitively expensive and I feel that the torrenting of the contents of it only furthers the paranoia that some filmmakers (or representatives of filmmakers) have about releasing their films on video.

The comment I made was made because a representative of his films audibly scoffed at an earnest question from an audience-member about the possibility of the films being released in a high-quality home video release. She did say the phrase it would "never happen."

Avant-garde film-works on DVD/Blu-ray/digital are a difficult issue. It's amazing to be able to study the Brakhage films at home but I imagine that university rentals of 16mm/35mm Brakhage prints are probably way down because of it. University libraries pay the institutional license for the discs and then professors will likely screen the discs in-class, with increasingly less understanding and relation to students of the actual form that made these works possible. And in works like those by Brakhage, the form is integral to understanding how and why we're seeing what we're seeing.

Also, sorry for the hyperbolic statement before, but again I was relating a quote from someone representing the Conner Trust at a screening. I hope that I'm wrong and a Blu-ray release does come out in the future!
User avatar
Jeff
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:49 am
Location: Denver, CO

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#2464 Post by Jeff »

Universal shifted distribution of Repo Man over to Focus five or six years ago. It still gets a lot of theatrical distribution thanks to midnight movie programs, and it was probably felt that the Focus division was better positioned to handle it. Of course Focus didn't exist when the movie was made, and earlier U.S. DVDs were released via Universal and under license from Universal by Anchor Bay.
yoshimori
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 6:03 am
Location: LA CA

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#2465 Post by yoshimori »

htshell wrote:I'm aware of that DVD. It's prohibitively expensive
Was only $30 from the Cohen Gallery, which is luckily just down the street from me, when it was available.

Bruce Conner called me (long story) a few months after the DVDs were on sale and seemed a bit peeved that they'd been made available - complaining about the DVD cutting into his 16mm rentals with Canyon. Hard to imagine he didn't approve in advance, but ...
User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:25 pm
Location: SLC, UT

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#2466 Post by swo17 »

Silly question: Does that Bruce Conner DVD happen to come with this book available from several sellers on ebay?
yoshimori
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 6:03 am
Location: LA CA

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#2467 Post by yoshimori »

The DVD and the book, along with the exhibition of his works that showed in Minneapolis, LA, and elsewhere at the time, have the same title, but the book doesn't contain the DVD. Sadly.
User avatar
acroyear
Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2012 2:22 am

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#2468 Post by acroyear »

I am convinced by bamwc2's screen grab that it is indeed Repo Man hinted in the Dec 2012 newsletter drawing. My first thought was a box of sugar, which made me think it might be a blu-ray upgrade of Sweet Movie.
Adam
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 12:29 am
Location: Los Angeles CA
Contact:

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#2469 Post by Adam »

yoshimori wrote:
htshell wrote:I'm aware of that DVD. It's prohibitively expensive
Was only $30 from the Cohen Gallery, which is luckily just down the street from me, when it was available.

Bruce Conner called me (long story) a few months after the DVDs were on sale and seemed a bit peeved that they'd been made available - complaining about the DVD cutting into his 16mm rentals with Canyon. Hard to imagine he didn't approve in advance, but ...
I bought it there too, along with a second DVD that came out later, to less fanfare. Nice for reference.
User avatar
aox
Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2008 4:02 pm
Location: nYc

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#2470 Post by aox »

Image
User avatar
jwd5275
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 4:26 pm
Location: SF, CA

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#2471 Post by jwd5275 »

Lord of the Flies on blu
User avatar
Harmonov
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2008 3:26 pm
Location: Bloomington, IN

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#2472 Post by Harmonov »

Makes sense that it's Lord of the Flies, but what about Straw Dogs...that's what I thought when I saw the broken glasses.
User avatar
Ashirg
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:10 pm
Location: Atlanta

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#2473 Post by Ashirg »

For some reason, I thought of Straw Dogs as well, but Lord of the Flies makes more sense as Piggy's glasses get broken...
User avatar
captveg
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 11:28 pm

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#2474 Post by captveg »

Definitely Lord of the Flies. One of the more blatant clues they've ever had.
User avatar
Forrest Taft
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 12:34 am
Location: Stavanger, Norway

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#2475 Post by Forrest Taft »

Is it just me, or does the pig look like Woody Allen? Not that I think Allen+Pig+Broken Glasses+Blu is really a hint, but Allen was the first thing I thought of.
Locked