Inherent Vice (Paul Thomas Anderson, 2014)

Discuss specific films and franchises
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
warren oates
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2012 4:16 pm

Re: Inherent Vice (Paul Thomas Anderson, 2014)

#26 Post by warren oates »

I know lots of people who work in post production and Norton is high up on their "never working with ever (again)" short list. He's notorious for meddling in the cut of every film where he has more power than the director and can get away with it, official producer credit or not. To be clear, American History X is a special case of crazy all around, but Norton has a rep for more routine and systematic power grabs that stands out, even in a town full of big ego stars who like to play games.
User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:25 pm
Location: SLC, UT

Re: Inherent Vice (Paul Thomas Anderson, 2014)

#27 Post by swo17 »

Well, Wes Anderson's working with him again anyway.
User avatar
mfunk9786
Under Chris' Protection
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 8:43 pm
Location: Miami, FL

Re: Inherent Vice (Paul Thomas Anderson, 2014)

#28 Post by mfunk9786 »

Not sure how he accomplishes it because he's such a meek, mellow guy, but Anderson manages to work several times with very [allegedly] complicated/difficult actors (Anjelica Huston, Bill Murray, Edward Norton, and of course the notoriously monstrous Bud Cort*)

*lest I receive any more PMs asking for sources, that one was a joke ;)
Last edited by mfunk9786 on Tue May 07, 2013 8:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
warren oates
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2012 4:16 pm

Re: Inherent Vice (Paul Thomas Anderson, 2014)

#29 Post by warren oates »

I wasn't talking about on-set drama or Norton's relationship with all above-the-line talent. I'm sure that directors like Wes Anderson, Spike Lee and David Fincher have enough power to forestall the shenanigans Norton might otherwise pull on set or off. In any case, it's pretty rare for a star to have such a negative reputation among those who spend their lives finishing up films. The only other people I've heard such bad things about are directors like Michael Mann and Michael Bay. I could burst mfunk's bubble a bit about the supposed outward meekness of Anderson too, but I think I'll stop there.
User avatar
matrixschmatrix
Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 3:26 am

Re: Inherent Vice (Paul Thomas Anderson, 2014)

#30 Post by matrixschmatrix »

Why on earth would it be a bad thing for a director to 'interfere' in post
User avatar
warren oates
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2012 4:16 pm

Re: Inherent Vice (Paul Thomas Anderson, 2014)

#31 Post by warren oates »

It's obviously not. Just that those two directors in particular have a terrible reputation for demeaning and demoralizing their crew, often to the detriment of their films, as well as for generalized douchiness in the service of their outsized egos. I haven't known anyone who's worked on Bay or Mann films who was eager to repeat the experience of being stuck in a small dark room with that kind of negative energy for months. What's exceptional about Norton is that he's garnered a similar reputation in spite of having officially directed only one film.
User avatar
Black Hat
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 9:34 pm
Location: NYC

Re: Inherent Vice (Paul Thomas Anderson, 2014)

#32 Post by Black Hat »

warren oates wrote:I could burst mfunk's bubble a bit about the supposed outward meekness of Anderson too, but I think I'll stop there.
HAHA!
User avatar
mfunk9786
Under Chris' Protection
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 8:43 pm
Location: Miami, FL

Re: Inherent Vice (Paul Thomas Anderson, 2014)

#33 Post by mfunk9786 »

I don't doubt it, but still. The guy has a gift for working with elusive/difficult actors.
User avatar
mfunk9786
Under Chris' Protection
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 8:43 pm
Location: Miami, FL

Re: Inherent Vice (Paul Thomas Anderson, 2014)

#34 Post by mfunk9786 »

User avatar
FerdinandGriffon
Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2008 3:16 pm

Re: Inherent Vice (Paul Thomas Anderson, 2014)

#35 Post by FerdinandGriffon »

I really hope that works out. Him plus Pynchon might make me love a PTA film other than Punch Drunk Love.
User avatar
mfunk9786
Under Chris' Protection
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 8:43 pm
Location: Miami, FL

Re: Inherent Vice (Paul Thomas Anderson, 2014)

#36 Post by mfunk9786 »

I'm trying my best to avoid the book wholesale, just for wanting to be surprised by the plot, dialogue, etc and not be nitpicking the film to death, but I'm excited about the fact that this will be Anderson's first pure book adaptation too
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: Inherent Vice (Paul Thomas Anderson, 2014)

#37 Post by domino harvey »

User avatar
Jeff
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:49 am
Location: Denver, CO

Re: Inherent Vice (Paul Thomas Anderson, 2014)

#38 Post by Jeff »

stroszeck
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 2:42 am

Re: Inherent Vice (Paul Thomas Anderson, 2014)

#39 Post by stroszeck »

Jeff wrote:
domino harvey wrote:Reese Witherspoon's in
So are Martin Short(!).
I think this may be one of those roles for Martin Short that's akin to what Refn did for Albert Brook's in Drive.
User avatar
flyonthewall2983
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 7:31 pm
Location: Indiana
Contact:

Re: Inherent Vice (Paul Thomas Anderson, 2014)

#40 Post by flyonthewall2983 »

He had a role not unlike that when he was on Damages.
User avatar
med
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 9:58 pm

Re: Inherent Vice (Paul Thomas Anderson, 2014)

#41 Post by med »

Short's role is being kept "under wraps," but it's worth noting that the novel is largely a comedy. So, I wouldn't assume this will be a Brooks/Drive situation.
User avatar
Jeff
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:49 am
Location: Denver, CO

Re: Inherent Vice (Paul Thomas Anderson, 2014)

#42 Post by Jeff »

rohming
Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2013 9:40 pm

Re: Inherent Vice (Paul Thomas Anderson, 2014)

#45 Post by rohming »

reading the book right now. it's definitely getting me jazzed for the movie, and in many ways PTA is a perfect fit for the source material, but at the same time the book is so heavy on dialogue--much of it pertinent dialogue that moves the story forward--that i'm having trouble imagining it as a truly visual film and not just 3 hours of shot-reverse shot talking.

i'm sure PTA will do a better job at re-imagining it than i...
User avatar
Graham
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2011 6:50 pm

Re: Inherent Vice (Paul Thomas Anderson, 2014)

#47 Post by Graham »

Hope she acts as well as she makes music.
Zot!
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 4:09 am

Re: Inherent Vice (Paul Thomas Anderson, 2014)

#48 Post by Zot! »

Why not just cast Geddy Lee too.
User avatar
mfunk9786
Under Chris' Protection
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 8:43 pm
Location: Miami, FL

Re: Inherent Vice (Paul Thomas Anderson, 2014)

#49 Post by mfunk9786 »

This is my favorite news of 2013.
User avatar
dustybooks
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 2:52 pm
Location: Wilmington, NC

Re: Inherent Vice (Paul Thomas Anderson, 2014)

#50 Post by dustybooks »

After seeing that PTA-directed video for Fiona Apple's "Hot Knife" last week, my fiancee and I were speculating on whether Anderson and Newsom, both being part of the swirling SNL circle, might one day collaborate. Validation!
Post Reply