Twilight Time / Redwind

Vinegar Syndrome, Deaf Crocodile, Imprint, Kino, and more
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
EddieLarkin
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2012 2:25 pm

Re: Twilight Time

#1601 Post by EddieLarkin »

fdm wrote:I also almost typed last night that The Wild Child clue was much more likely for Macbeth.
Are films hinted at in the New Years drawing ever re-hinted at in the newsletter clues?
User avatar
Feego
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 11:30 pm
Location: Texas

Re: Twilight Time

#1602 Post by Feego »

EddieLarkin wrote:
fdm wrote:I also almost typed last night that The Wild Child clue was much more likely for Macbeth.
Are films hinted at in the New Years drawing ever re-hinted at in the newsletter clues?
Not frequently, but sometimes they are. The tannis root necklace from Rosemary's Baby showed up in a New Years drawing, and they later hinted at it again in a newsletter with a baby Rosemary sprig. Whether or not the figure with long hair in this year's New Years drawing was for Macbeth or The Wild Child (although consensus around here is that it was one of the witches), the figure was still wiping a "damned spot," which was also the subject of a later newsletter clue. So Macbeth was hinted twice.
User avatar
EddieLarkin
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2012 2:25 pm

Re: Twilight Time

#1603 Post by EddieLarkin »

Oh yes, I forgot about the spot in the New Years drawing.
User avatar
pointless
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 1:55 pm

Re: Twilight Time

#1604 Post by pointless »

January releases booklet artwork:

Image Image

Image Image

Image
User avatar
flyonthewall2983
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 7:31 pm
Location: Indiana
Contact:

Re: Twilight Time

#1605 Post by flyonthewall2983 »

That Breaking Away cover is underwhelming.
User avatar
EddieLarkin
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2012 2:25 pm

Re: Twilight Time

#1606 Post by EddieLarkin »

Ron Shelton signed copies of Under Fire going free with qualifying orders tomorrow, Tue 23rd 4pm EST.
User avatar
solaris72
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 7:03 pm
Location: Baltimore, MD

Re: Twilight Time

#1607 Post by solaris72 »

The blu-ray.com review for Heaven & Earth is up- the reviewer gives it 4.5/5 PQ but if you look at the actual screencaps (at full res) there's severe jagged pixelation like I've never seen on a BD. At this price, it's completely appalling. And according to one poster on their forums, it's not just the caps- their copy of the disc shows the same thing.
User avatar
tenia
Ask Me About My Bassoon
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 3:13 pm

Re: Twilight Time

#1608 Post by tenia »

solaris72 wrote:there's severe jagged pixelation like I've never seen on a BD.
Actually, it reminds me, like others, of the Enter the Dragon first BD.
User avatar
EddieLarkin
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2012 2:25 pm

Re: Twilight Time

#1609 Post by EddieLarkin »

Presumably it's an old transfer. Stone is ecstatic about the release and the PQ on his Facebook, so this is probably it for Heaven & Earth on home video.
User avatar
Cinephrenic
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 6:58 pm
Location: Paris, Texas

Re: Twilight Time

#1610 Post by Cinephrenic »

So when the limited editions run out, are the rights lost? When can we see other studios release the titles that are out-of-print? Does anyone know how long Twilight Time licenced these out?
Calvin
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2011 3:12 pm

Re: Twilight Time

#1611 Post by Calvin »

Cinephrenic wrote:So when the limited editions run out, are the rights lost? When can we see other studios release the titles that are out-of-print? Does anyone know how long Twilight Time licenced these out?
3 years, I believe
User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:25 pm
Location: SLC, UT

Re: Twilight Time

#1612 Post by swo17 »

Each license is for three years. If the 3,000 copies sell out in one year, no new copies can be printed, and no one else can release the title until the three years are over.
User avatar
EddieLarkin
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2012 2:25 pm

Re: Twilight Time

#1613 Post by EddieLarkin »

Though as we've already seen with Fright Night (and for future release, a number of other OOP titles), "other studios" just ends up being Twilight Time again. So for some titles they'll have them for 6 years.
User avatar
cdnchris
Site Admin
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 6:45 pm
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: Twilight Time

#1614 Post by cdnchris »

solaris72 wrote:The blu-ray.com review for Heaven & Earth is up- the reviewer gives it 4.5/5 PQ but if you look at the actual screencaps (at full res) there's severe jagged pixelation like I've never seen on a BD. At this price, it's completely appalling. And according to one poster on their forums, it's not just the caps- their copy of the disc shows the same thing.
I watched it yesterday and I noticed this as well. It's obviously an older transfer, wouldn't be surprised if it was the one for the DVD. Disappointing to say the least.
Noiradelic
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 4:45 am

Re: Twilight Time

#1615 Post by Noiradelic »

EddieLarkin wrote:Though as we've already seen with Fright Night (and for future release, a number of other OOP titles), "other studios" just ends up being Twilight Time again. So for some titles they'll have them for 6 years.
If they can renew once, they may well be able to renew again and again.
User avatar
Valin Kenobi
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2014 7:25 pm
Location: Flyover Country

Re: Twilight Time

#1616 Post by Valin Kenobi »

The impression I get is that if a title sells out, TT will likely get another 3 years repeated indefinitely (why mess with something that works), and if the 3,000 don't sell, which let's face it is not a lot of copies, no one else will want to release it. Not taking into account, of course, you might have sold more releasing it cheaper and through wider channels, but whatevs. And in particular, it seems logical to use a sellout as indicating enough demand for a "real" release, but then the owners that license to TT are the ones that didn't want to be hassled with their catalog in the first place.
User avatar
pointless
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 1:55 pm

Re: Twilight Time

#1617 Post by pointless »

On their FB page, TT has confirmed that Zelig is on their long-term schedule.
User avatar
pointless
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 1:55 pm

Re: Twilight Time

#1618 Post by pointless »

Lenny (Bob Fosse, 1974)

Release Date: February 10th, 2015.
Pre-order date: Wednesday, January 21st at 4 pm EST.

Special Features:
  • Isolated Score Track
    Audio Commentary with Film Historians Julie Kirgo and Nick Redman
    Original Theatrical Trailer
Image
Last edited by pointless on Wed Jan 28, 2015 6:44 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
pointless
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 1:55 pm

Re: Twilight Time

#1619 Post by pointless »

Love and Death (Woody Allen, 1975)

Release Date: February 10th, 2015.
Pre-order date: Wednesday, January 21st at 4 pm EST.

Special Features:
  • Isolated Music & Effects Track
    Original Theatrical Trailer
Image
Last edited by pointless on Wed Jan 28, 2015 6:43 am, edited 1 time in total.
Orlac
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 8:29 am

Re: Twilight Time

#1620 Post by Orlac »

You'd think TT could get a better shill than Bruce Kimmel.
User avatar
EddieLarkin
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2012 2:25 pm

Re: Twilight Time

#1621 Post by EddieLarkin »

Twilight Time wrote:Heads-up from SAE - fewer than 500 copies remaining of the FRIGHT NIGHT: 30th Anniversary Edition - these are moving very quickly - you have been warned! Happy New Year, everyone!
Going unusually fast, despite the 5000 copies and 1 copy per person limit that has been in place for some time now. The Blob took a lot longer than this despite it being its first and only pressing.
User avatar
EddieLarkin
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2012 2:25 pm

Re: Twilight Time

#1622 Post by EddieLarkin »

And it's gone. Again.
Zot!
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 4:09 am

Re: Twilight Time

#1623 Post by Zot! »

Good lord, queue the whining for the next three years.
User avatar
fdm
Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 5:25 pm

Re: Twilight Time

#1624 Post by fdm »

Good since now I've managed to avoid it twice.
criterion10

Re: Twilight Time

#1625 Post by criterion10 »

My god, that cover for Love and Death is disgusting. And to think that the old MGM cover was perfectly fine...
Post Reply