
Lanthimos directs and photographs Emma Stone's photo shoot for W
HinkyDinkyTruesmith wrote: Mon Dec 17, 2018 1:37 amSpoiler
Did anyone think the film overstated Abigail's villainy? Not that she isn't nasty, narcissistic, conniving, and whatever else––but who in this film isn't?
The biggest offense she commits, almost killing Sarah, was mostly an accident (she neither knew how strong the poison was, nor that Sarah would promptly go riding), and other than that, all she really wants is to be reinstated to her former rank. Her villainy consists of personal backstabbing and emotional manipulation, but rarely does she actually care about maliciously hurting other people (even her final acts to assure Sarah's expulsion are motivated by self-defense rather than any contempt for Sarah).
HinkyDinkyTruesmith wrote: Mon Dec 17, 2018 1:37 amSpoiler
Likewise, it's a key ambiguity of the film about whether Sarah explicitly loves Anne, or if she loves the power that Anne provides. The burning of the letters suggests the former, but not strongly enough to eliminate the latter from consideration.
HinkyDinkyTruesmith wrote: Mon Dec 17, 2018 1:37 amSpoiler
Anne is oblivious for the most part, a truly pathetic (in its original use) individual who is haunted by dead children and plagued by gout. Her scene with Abigail where it is revealed she keeps the rabbits for each dead child is the strongest moment in the film by far, perfectly understated.
Interesting read, which made me realize Weisz's character is also lead into a very similar situation in a way.domino harvey wrote: Mon Feb 18, 2019 5:34 pmSpoiler
I don’t think she’s a villain either. I’ve been deeply disappointed by all the responses I’ve read to this movie (here and elsewhere) that ignore (or are ignorant of) what it says about the importance of class and social mobility in the society of the film. Stone is really the protagonist here and the film tracks how she uses all methods at her disposal to first reachieve her former status and then surpass it, only for the film to damn her to a not dissimilar fate as that which awaited her whoring on the street regardless. It’s a variation of the film’s basic All About Eve riff but in many ways crueler since there’s no Addison DeWitt or a fan club booster to single out as the vehicle of vengeance but the non-corporeal class system itself.
"If everyone was like you, society would disintegrate" is a line good enough to launch a Sarah-focused sequel.MichaelB wrote: Tue Feb 19, 2019 7:18 pm Here’s one of Queen Anne’s biographers (and, crucially, someone very familiar with the source letters that inspired the script) on the subject.
Plane tickets from Boston to Greece that weekend ~$800 8-[
Which anachronisms do you mean?The Curious Sofa wrote:I think Sophia Coppola did this type of thing best with Marie Antoinette, which despite the anachronisms, connects with history and the psychology of the characters in a more meaningful way, while being both funny and tragic.
Rather than focusing on the political context, Coppola is interested in drawing parallels to contemporary celebrity culture, a central theme in most of her films. She frames Antoinette as the Paris Hilton of her day. This was a main criticism of the movie at the time, but of course is what makes it a great Sophia Coppola film. There are contemporary props in the movie, like the famous pair of Converse sneakers among her shopping bounty, Marie Antoinette is listening to New Order and The Strokes. She will never fit in, because she is a hip, young woman trapped in a rigid, outdated system and Coppola underlines this by placing her ahead of her times.Mr Sausage wrote: Tue Jan 02, 2024 5:40 amWhich anachronisms do you mean?The Curious Sofa wrote:I think Sophia Coppola did this type of thing best with Marie Antoinette, which despite the anachronisms, connects with history and the psychology of the characters in a more meaningful way, while being both funny and tragic.