I wouldn't think they would do that either, but if physical media continues to be less of a concern for them, I can see how they'd be open to letting it go to Criterion under the right deal. I'm not sure if it's analogous, but I remember when Sony Music licensed off the Miles Davis and Bob Dylan catalog to an audiophile label, for both vinyl and the format they recently pioneered SACD - it was already difficult to license anything from them for reissue, and it even made more logical sense for them not to even though sales in physical media had already begun to decline.yoloswegmaster wrote: ↑Wed Jun 16, 2021 10:11 amWas it ever confirmed that Criterion has the rights to this? I know that the 2 companies have a close relationship but I can't imagine Warner Bros would be ok with letting the rights go to one of their biggest titles ever.
1104 Citizen Kane
- hearthesilence
- Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 4:22 am
- Location: NYC
Re: Citizen Kane (Orson Welles, 1941)
- swo17
- Bloodthirsty Butcher
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 10:25 am
- Location: SLC, UT
Re: Citizen Kane (Orson Welles, 1941)
Watch Criterion release a deluxe Blu-ray and Warner put out a UHD
- FrauBlucher
- Joined: Mon Jul 15, 2013 8:28 pm
- Location: Greenwich Village
Re: Citizen Kane (Orson Welles, 1941)
As I posted several years back, a reliable source told me that Criterion did acquire Citizen Kane. It was around the time that CC gave us Magnificent Ambersons clue from the Newsletter. The source also said Journey Into Fear as well.yoloswegmaster wrote: ↑Wed Jun 16, 2021 10:11 amWas it ever confirmed that Criterion has the rights to this? I know that the 2 companies have a close relationship but I can't imagine Warner Bros would be ok with letting the rights go to one of their biggest titles ever.
- ianthemovie
- Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 10:51 am
- Location: Boston, MA
- Contact:
Re: Citizen Kane (Orson Welles, 1941)
I believe there was a member of the forum, I can't remember which, who claimed to have inside knowledge that it was coming from Criterion, but that was some years ago, and I can't recall any other confirmation in the meantime. And there's still a chance that it won't happen. But I also have a hard time believing that WB would commission a scholarly commentary track by the likes of Naremore and Rosenbaum, especially when Roger Ebert's highly accessible commentary track (arguably one of the best ever recorded, to be fair) already exists.yoloswegmaster wrote: ↑Wed Jun 16, 2021 10:11 amWas it ever confirmed that Criterion has the rights to this? I know that the 2 companies have a close relationship but I can't imagine Warner Bros would be ok with letting the rights go to one of their biggest titles ever.
EDIT: Thanks, Frau Blucher, for confirming that!
- dwk
- Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2010 6:10 pm
-
- Joined: Fri May 18, 2018 3:07 pm
Re: Citizen Kane (Orson Welles, 1941)
hearthesilence wrote: ↑Tue Jun 15, 2021 11:29 pmWould be a perfect inaugural UHD release. I'm not being entirely facetious, the stock BD already looks great, so having a UHD option would be a very helpful selling point. Regardless, if it's a Criterion release I'm sure the extras will be better this time around - the crappy HBO movie and even crappier American Experience documentary piled on to the other one actually took the entire package down a few notches.
Oh, god, don't even remind me about RKO 281 or Tim Robbins' The Cradle Will Rock
Call me crazy, but I'd actually be interested in hearing a commentary that has Welles' daughters on it. I'd be interested to hear their first-hand knowledge of what their father said about the film.
- Drucker
- Your Future our Drucker
- Joined: Wed May 18, 2011 9:37 am
Re: Citizen Kane (Orson Welles, 1941)
At a Q&A a few years ago, I asked one of his daughters about her father's reaction to Kane being named the greatest film of all time. She said her father's response was, "I've made way better films since then."beamish14 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 16, 2021 11:55 amhearthesilence wrote: ↑Tue Jun 15, 2021 11:29 pmWould be a perfect inaugural UHD release. I'm not being entirely facetious, the stock BD already looks great, so having a UHD option would be a very helpful selling point. Regardless, if it's a Criterion release I'm sure the extras will be better this time around - the crappy HBO movie and even crappier American Experience documentary piled on to the other one actually took the entire package down a few notches.
Oh, god, don't even remind me about RKO 281 or Tim Robbins' The Cradle Will Rock
Call me crazy, but I'd actually be interested in hearing a commentary that has Welles' daughters on it. I'd be interested to hear their first-hand knowledge of what their father said about the film.
- yoloswegmaster
- Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2016 3:57 pm
Re: Citizen Kane (Orson Welles, 1941)
Thank you for confirming that! It seems that Criterion now has the rights to Citizen Kane, Journey Into Fear, The Other Side of the Wind (presumably they also have the rights to Morgan Neville's documentary), and It's All True, alongside The Eyes of Orson Welles.FrauBlucher wrote: ↑Wed Jun 16, 2021 11:22 amAs I posted several years back, a reliable source told me that Criterion did acquire Citizen Kane. It was around the time that CC gave us Magnificent Ambersons clue from the Newsletter. The source also said Journey Into Fear as well.yoloswegmaster wrote: ↑Wed Jun 16, 2021 10:11 amWas it ever confirmed that Criterion has the rights to this? I know that the 2 companies have a close relationship but I can't imagine Warner Bros would be ok with letting the rights go to one of their biggest titles ever.
-
- Joined: Fri May 18, 2018 3:07 pm
Re: Citizen Kane (Orson Welles, 1941)
yoloswegmaster wrote: ↑Wed Jun 16, 2021 1:12 pmThank you for confirming that! It seems that Criterion now has the rights to Citizen Kane, Journey Into Fear, The Other Side of the Wind (presumably they also have the rights to Morgan Neville's documentary), and It's All True, alongside The Eyes of Orson Welles.FrauBlucher wrote: ↑Wed Jun 16, 2021 11:22 amAs I posted several years back, a reliable source told me that Criterion did acquire Citizen Kane. It was around the time that CC gave us Magnificent Ambersons clue from the Newsletter. The source also said Journey Into Fear as well.yoloswegmaster wrote: ↑Wed Jun 16, 2021 10:11 amWas it ever confirmed that Criterion has the rights to this? I know that the 2 companies have a close relationship but I can't imagine Warner Bros would be ok with letting the rights go to one of their biggest titles ever.
It's All True is in a tricky place, as there is so much unused material still sitting in UCLA's archives. I'm sure the makers of the documentary would want another pass at it, but restoring and properly ensuring the longterm viability of that footage is a very expensive proposition. Catherine Benamou's book on it has some interesting information I haven't encountered before.
- PfR73
- Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2005 6:07 pm
Re: Citizen Kane (Orson Welles, 1941)
I watched Cradle Will Rock [no "The", BTW] for the first time about a month or so ago and it's maybe my favorite movie seen so far this year. It's way more Altman-influenced than Welles, though, and with Altman being my favorite director that's a very positive thing IMO.
I also watched RKO 281 and I will agree that one wasn't very interesting.
- domino harvey
- Dot Com Dom
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm
Re: Citizen Kane (Orson Welles, 1941)
Cradle Will Rock is terrific, I don’t get the swipe either. Uber energetic and fun show offy directing by Robbins. Kinda dreamily left wing, but it works
-
- Joined: Fri May 18, 2018 3:07 pm
Re: Citizen Kane (Orson Welles, 1941)
domino harvey wrote: ↑Wed Jun 16, 2021 1:52 pmCradle Will Rock is terrific, I don’t get the swipe either. Uber energetic and fun show offy directing by Robbins. Kinda dreamily left wing, but it works
The swipe wasn't really so much at the film as its characterization of Welles (which I liked more in Linklater's underrated Me and Orson Welles). But then, I haven't seen it in decades, and perhaps my recollection of it is quite off.
- Ribs
- Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2014 1:14 pm
Re: Citizen Kane (Orson Welles, 1941)
This is not true - they have not included UHD rights on their extant deals, which MGM has (that, for example, Kino could theoretically upgrade a bunch of their MGM titles without cutting a new deal). But Kino and Arrow don’t have WB deals - Shout and Criterion do, and thus far neither has shown any interest in releasing anything in 4K (in Shout’s case, that doesn’t already have an extant international release reducing their overhead). So we don’t really have anything to say they don’t license UHD rights because in all likelihood the only partners they would discuss them with have been slow to enter the fold.
- dwk
- Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2010 6:10 pm
Re: Citizen Kane (Orson Welles, 1941)
When asked about their Friday the 13th box being Blu-ray only, Scream said that neither would license UHD rights.
- hearthesilence
- Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 4:22 am
- Location: NYC
Re: Citizen Kane (Orson Welles, 1941)
Joseph McBride made the excellent point that whenever Welles has been portrayed in film, it's typically a terrible portrayal in a not-so-good film. I actually like Ed Wood but even its otherwise entertaining tribute is marred by the fact that it gets everything wrong about Welles. (Heston playing a Mexican wasn't forced on him - Welles himself changed the locale to the Mexican border and made Heston's character a Mexican - and as Drucker already pointed out, he believed he did better films after Citizen Kane). Richard Linklater and Christian McKay are probably the only ones who came up with an excellent portrayal of him in Me and Orson Welles.
- knives
- Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 6:49 pm
Re: Citizen Kane (Orson Welles, 1941)
To be fair to Ed Wood the scene, and film at large, are clearly intended to be imagined to relay to us the experience of being Ed Wood. What matters for that scene is how Wood feels about Welles and nothing historic.
- hearthesilence
- Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 4:22 am
- Location: NYC
Re: Citizen Kane (Orson Welles, 1941)
Yeah, the whole thing's like a sweet little fantasy, even with the darker and tragic elements (like Bela Lugosi and Wood's bad break-up with Dolores Fuller), but I wish they were a little less sloppy or lazy about the details in that scene - doing so wouldn't compromise the tone.
- knives
- Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 6:49 pm
Re: Citizen Kane (Orson Welles, 1941)
I’m saying they’re not being lazy nor sloppy. To adhere to historical facts in that scene, which never happened in real life to begin with, if anything would be sloppy as the thematic pull and joke is this idea,iced version of Welles that Wood sees as himself
.
.
- hearthesilence
- Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 4:22 am
- Location: NYC
Re: Citizen Kane (Orson Welles, 1941)
Imaginary or speculative works based on real life characters still have some basis in reality and it's always something you have to navigate - obviously the dramatization is all fiction, that's inherent in the whole concept, but unless it's needed to contribute to an overall point, it can still be lazy to disregard any and all real life details simply because "hey this story's imaginary, so everything can be made up however we want." It's one scene and not exactly a fatal flaw, but it was no surprise when the same writers wrote a far less successful film in Man on the Moon because they seemed to have no idea where to go with the real life details except re-enact them - the excuse one of them gave even sounded like outright laziness (i.e. it's impossible to figure out Andy Kaufman, so we decided why bother? His life was entertaining, isn't that enough?)
- knives
- Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 6:49 pm
Re: Citizen Kane (Orson Welles, 1941)
Why would they need any basis?
- hearthesilence
- Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 4:22 am
- Location: NYC
Re: Citizen Kane (Orson Welles, 1941)
Because it's inherent in the whole idea.
- knives
- Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 6:49 pm
Re: Citizen Kane (Orson Welles, 1941)
How? Some of the best pieces of art based on historical people has nothing to do with reality let alone those historical people. Would The Social Network be any better if it stayed closer to reality?
- PfR73
- Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2005 6:07 pm
Re: Citizen Kane (Orson Welles, 1941)
Or for that matter, would Citizen Kane?
- Michael Kerpan
- Spelling Bee Champeen
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:20 pm
- Location: New England
- Contact:
Re: Citizen Kane (Orson Welles, 1941)
Citizen Kane is based on a composite of real people, not purporting to be "historical" or "biographical"... (Unlike Amadeus, for instance)
-
- Joined: Fri May 18, 2018 3:07 pm
Re: Citizen Kane (Orson Welles, 1941)
Amadeus is not, strictly speaking, a biographical work, either. Peter Shaffer limned the surface of real figures' lives to devise a work of his own. It's so brilliant and popular, though, that some confuse facets of the characters from the play/film with research-corroborated fact.Michael Kerpan wrote: ↑Wed Jun 16, 2021 6:45 pmCitizen Kane is based on a composite of real people, not purporting to be "historical" or "biographical"... (Unlike Amadeus, for instance)