Jokers (Todd Phillips, 2019-2024)

Discuss specific films and franchises
Message
Author
User avatar
therewillbeblus
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2015 7:40 pm

Re: Jokers (Todd Phillips, 2019-?)

#326 Post by therewillbeblus »

Only Scorsese moviez allowed
User avatar
aox
Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2008 4:02 pm
Location: nYc

Re: Jokers (Todd Phillips, 2019-?)

#327 Post by aox »

A modern The Age of Innocence Joker, please.
Harvest
Joined: Mon May 30, 2022 1:18 am

Re: Jokers (Todd Phillips, 2019-?)

#328 Post by Harvest »

Maybe it's just me but it feels like most of Phoenix's directors recently just don't know how to use him properly. I'm not sure even Lynne Ramsay used him as effectively as she could've. It's like they all want him to do The Master, but just don't really grok what made that performance so good.

It feels like time for he and James Gray to collaborate again. They both could really use it.
User avatar
Never Cursed
Such is life on board the Redoutable
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2016 4:22 am

Re: Jokers (Todd Phillips, 2019-?)

#329 Post by Never Cursed »

Eh, I don't really agree with that - Mills and Van Sant got great stuff out of him, as did Audiard (even if that last movie doesn't amount to much on the whole), and I wouldn't describe his character in any of those films as similar to Freddie Quell other than the basic conceit of them being varying levels of disaffected
User avatar
therewillbeblus
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2015 7:40 pm

Re: Jokers (Todd Phillips, 2019-?)

#330 Post by therewillbeblus »

I’ll beat the lone drum for his excellent, subtly-layered, sincerely-directed comic perf that wryly eviscerates the overthinker in Irrational Man, at least until knives opens this thread
Harvest
Joined: Mon May 30, 2022 1:18 am

Re: Jokers (Todd Phillips, 2019-?)

#331 Post by Harvest »

Never Cursed wrote: Fri Jun 17, 2022 1:15 am Eh, I don't really agree with that - Mills and Van Sant got great stuff out of him, as did Audiard (even if that last movie doesn't amount to much on the whole), and I wouldn't describe his character in any of those films as similar to Freddie Quell other than the basic conceit of them being varying levels of disaffected
therewillbeblus wrote: Fri Jun 17, 2022 2:06 am I’ll beat the lone drum for his excellent, subtly-layered, sincerely-directed comic perf that wryly eviscerates the overthinker in Irrational Man, at least until knives opens this thread
Hmm I found him pretty forgettable/miscast in all those, especially in the Audiard and Allen films. He's fine in the Mills film, but his character is ultimately just a framing device and it mostly felt like a calculated decision to play "nice" after Joker. The last few years have seemed mostly a cycle of depressed loners, alcholics, and depressed alcoholic loners.

Even in You Were Never Really Here and Joker, he plays a mentally ill loner who lives in/around Brooklyn (Gothan in Joker but you get the idea) whose only friend is his mother and he already did that in Two Lovers.

I know the popular opinion is that he's greatly improved post-I'm Still Here but I don't know about that anymore. I think it may have boxed him in as an actor and that he was actually doing a wider range of roles before even if the films were mostly forgettable.

I'm actually looking forward to him as Napoleon much more than the Ari Aster film, which again, looks like another "crazy" performance which feels stale now.
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: Jokers (Todd Phillips, 2019-?)

#332 Post by domino harvey »

Orlac
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 8:29 am

Re: Jokers (Todd Phillips, 2019-?)

#333 Post by Orlac »

Could be worse. Could have been Chris Pratt.
User avatar
therewillbeblus
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2015 7:40 pm

Re: Jokers (Todd Phillips, 2019-?)

#334 Post by therewillbeblus »

Makes sense, Harley Quinn goes gaga over the Joker
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: Jokers (Todd Phillips, 2019-?)

#335 Post by domino harvey »

More like Lady Haha amirite
User avatar
hearthesilence
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 8:22 am
Location: NYC

Re: Jokers (Todd Phillips, 2019-?)

#336 Post by hearthesilence »

Feels like a good match when I think of the aesthetic overkill of her albums and the previous film...which is to say, not my thing.
User avatar
therewillbeblus
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2015 7:40 pm

Re: Jokers (Todd Phillips, 2019-?)

#337 Post by therewillbeblus »

You don't like Scorsese?
User avatar
hearthesilence
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 8:22 am
Location: NYC

Re: Jokers (Todd Phillips, 2019-?)

#338 Post by hearthesilence »

I like Scorsese, but Joker feels like a shallow, misguided imitation, like her awful Grammy tribute to Bowie.
User avatar
therewillbeblus
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2015 7:40 pm

Re: Jokers (Todd Phillips, 2019-?)

#339 Post by therewillbeblus »

Hmmm I guess I see problems with the aesthetic levels as different from the shallowness of the film as you describe them. It's one thing to say that what bothers one about Joker is it being an empty emulation of only the surface level of Scorsese's work, but instead I read a dislike of the "aesthetic overkill" -that simultaneously is being recognized as resembling the surface of Scorsese's work- as a dislike of his aesthetic strategy as well. I can appreciate why people would be miffed at a Scorsese-ripoff without perceived substance, as well as at a film without substance separated from its influences, but to say one dislikes the aesthetic divorced from the comparative reasons causes distaste towards the imitation to be conflated with distaste towards the preferred version. I realize this is very pedantic, but it's difficult for me to see a consistent rationale behind your last two posts pertaining to what about the film didn't work for you aesthetically, and I'm genuinely very interested because I'm still on the fence about this one too -though for (potentially?) different reasons
User avatar
hearthesilence
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 8:22 am
Location: NYC

Re: Jokers (Todd Phillips, 2019-?)

#340 Post by hearthesilence »

I don't think Scorsese's best work is overkill. I think a lot of his imitators can be because there isn't much there to prop up their choices and provide the motivation that gives those choices a strong reason to be.

Switching to music, I always found Lady Gaga bombastic, more so when she's derivative - like she's taking something familiar and doing it louder or more bluntly. Even when she goes for something "smaller" in scale like the music in A Star Is Born, she lays it on thick, burying any convincing feeling. But I can think of plenty of densely-produced albums that never seem like overkill to me, because they have a lot to say and it feels like they have a lot going on underneath the surface that supports the density of the records they're making.
User avatar
therewillbeblus
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2015 7:40 pm

Re: Jokers (Todd Phillips, 2019-?)

#341 Post by therewillbeblus »

Trailer for the second film

Looks like the best case imaginable at first glance, which shouldn't be mistaken for confidence. Still, cautiously optimistic for the musical components working
User avatar
The Curious Sofa
Joined: Fri Sep 13, 2019 10:18 am

Re: Jokers (Todd Phillips, 2019-?)

#342 Post by The Curious Sofa »

I'm no fan of the first Joker but was intrigued by claims that the sequel will be inspired by One From the Heart, which I recently wrote about in the Francis Ford Coppola thread after watching the new Blu-ray. The trailer appears to confirm this. The mash-up of two classics, Taxi Driver and The King of Comedy, didn't do much for me, taking on an underappreciated film as visually rich and eccentric as One From the Heart strikes me as more promising.
User avatar
Walter Kurtz
Joined: Sat Jul 25, 2020 7:03 pm

Re: Jokers (Todd Phillips, 2019-?)

#343 Post by Walter Kurtz »

I love the trailer and I don't even like Gaga. Nice hat-tip to Cherbourg also. I also liked Pennies from Heaven even though it had some problems. But then I'm the kind of guy who breaks out into a stanza from a song whenever I feel like it. A shrink one time said I was a hundred percent Id. Then I said fuck you, you're a moron. He said not an idiot. Id. Freudian Id. I still thought he was a moron but I didn't repeat it.
User avatar
colinr0380
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 8:30 pm
Location: Chapel-en-le-Frith, Derbyshire, UK

Re: Jokers (Todd Phillips, 2019-?)

#344 Post by colinr0380 »

The Curious Sofa wrote: Wed Apr 10, 2024 2:42 pm I'm no fan of the first Joker but was intrigued by claims that the sequel will be inspired by One From the Heart, which I recently wrote about in the Francis Ford Coppola thread after watching the new Blu-ray. The trailer appears to confirm this. The mash-up of two classics, Taxi Driver and The King of Comedy, didn't do much for me, taking on an underappreciated film as visually rich and eccentric as One From the Heart strikes me as more promising.
Or maybe the other grand musical folly of a New Hollywood director from the same period, Scorsese's New York, New York.
User avatar
The Curious Sofa
Joined: Fri Sep 13, 2019 10:18 am

Re: Jokers (Todd Phillips, 2019-?)

#345 Post by The Curious Sofa »

colinr0380 wrote: Thu Apr 11, 2024 8:31 pm
The Curious Sofa wrote: Wed Apr 10, 2024 2:42 pm I'm no fan of the first Joker but was intrigued by claims that the sequel will be inspired by One From the Heart, which I recently wrote about in the Francis Ford Coppola thread after watching the new Blu-ray. The trailer appears to confirm this. The mash-up of two classics, Taxi Driver and The King of Comedy, didn't do much for me, taking on an underappreciated film as visually rich and eccentric as One From the Heart strikes me as more promising.
Or maybe the other grand musical folly of a New Hollywood director from the same period, Scorsese's New York, New York.
Good call, I love a musical folly when it turns out like either of these. The two films are closely linked for me, the directors' cut of New York, New York got a theatrical release around the time One From the Heat came out and that's when I first saw it. It's one of my favourite Scorsese movies, I love the weird mash up of classic MGM musical and raw, John Cassavetes style marital drama.
User avatar
flyonthewall2983
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 7:31 pm
Location: Indiana
Contact:

Re: Jokers (Todd Phillips, 2019-?)

#346 Post by flyonthewall2983 »

Thinking about seeing this, i wonder if it would matter at all if I just go in and see it first then entertain the idea of watching the first after.
User avatar
therewillbeblus
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2015 7:40 pm

Re: Jokers (Todd Phillips, 2019-?)

#347 Post by therewillbeblus »

Unless the script's been leaked online, I doubt anyone here knows the answer to that yet
User avatar
Matt
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 4:58 pm

Re: Jokers (Todd Phillips, 2019-?)

#348 Post by Matt »

My guess is you’ll be fine. The first movie is not that deep or complicated. The Joker is a bad guy and is now in Arkham Asylum. End credits.
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: Jokers (Todd Phillips, 2019-?)

#349 Post by domino harvey »

The sequel will open with
Spoiler
A Looney Tunes-style cartoon starring the Joker, animated by the director of Les Triplettes de Belleville
User avatar
Kracker
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2013 6:06 pm

Re: Jokers (Todd Phillips, 2019-?)

#350 Post by Kracker »

Guess that's where all the budget is really going
Post Reply