Spoiler
Sparked by a disruption to the working order of a relationship, one party cannot bring himself to accept inconsistencies in behavior, while the other firmly accepts all inconsistencies in their partner's behavior. They both cope in the most respectably absurd ways possible, but there's an undercurrent of relatability: One person is pushing the other away, convincing himself of no affinity, as a form of self-protection against the possibility of change unwitnessed by him, her partner. The other is desperate for security, and elastically finds a portion of this in the mere presence of a familiar being, not understanding the change in him but disbelieving it's existence by reframing his role as sturdy. "He's always been there for me" in the past becomes conflated with predictable behavior in the present, and without another resource for stability, she follows that broken lighthouse because she knows it is - functional or not - a lighthouse.
I guess it's a study in black-and-white thinking as a defense mechanism in relationships, particularly when pieces of the foundation are removed, yielding an unsettling reminder of how fragile that can be. And then of course, the absurdity of what we'll do. Stone's actions are loud, but Plemons slowly turning into a hungry cannibal for anyone other than his "alien" wife's flesh is a fun metaphor.
I guess it's a study in black-and-white thinking as a defense mechanism in relationships, particularly when pieces of the foundation are removed, yielding an unsettling reminder of how fragile that can be. And then of course, the absurdity of what we'll do. Stone's actions are loud, but Plemons slowly turning into a hungry cannibal for anyone other than his "alien" wife's flesh is a fun metaphor.