1254 Godzilla vs. Biollante

Discuss releases by Criterion and the films on them. Threads may contain spoilers!
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

1254 Godzilla vs. Biollante

#1 Post by domino harvey »

TK
User avatar
soundchaser
Leave Her to Beaver
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2016 4:32 am

Re: 1254 Godzilla vs. Biollante

#2 Post by soundchaser »

I haven’t seen any of the Heisei era Godzillas, but my understanding is they’re all sort of linked? Why would you do a box set for Showa but not these?
User avatar
midnitedave
Has an interesting face
Joined: Tue May 17, 2016 3:35 pm
Contact:

Re: 1254 Godzilla vs. Biollante

#3 Post by midnitedave »

soundchaser wrote: Fri Dec 13, 2024 4:45 pm I haven’t seen any of the Heisei era Godzillas, but my understanding is they’re all sort of linked? Why would you do a box set for Showa but not these?
You're correct, all the Heisei era Godzillas follow a story arc with reoccurring characters. I suspect since the rights for Biollante were tied up with Miramax, there may have been a limitation preventing it from being included with a boxset (please correct me if I'm mistaken, anyone). Additionally, since this was the sole Heisei era title to be OOP, it makes it a no-brainer to release ASAP.

Update: Correction, Biollante isn't the only Heisei era title to be OOP but it was fetching the highest prices on eBay. So, demand was up there.
Last edited by midnitedave on Fri Dec 13, 2024 5:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
yoloswegmaster
Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2016 7:57 pm

Re: 1254 Godzilla vs. Biollante

#4 Post by yoloswegmaster »

Criterion/Janus only have the rights to the first 4 titles in the Heisei-era series, but only 1 other film from those 4 besides Biollante has received a 4K restoration (Return of Godzilla). Sony's rights for the rest of the Heisei-era films were supposed to expire last year but I suspect they have a longer hold on it then expected.
User avatar
dwk
Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2010 10:10 pm

Re: 1254 Godzilla vs. Biollante

#5 Post by dwk »

This one briefly had a Blu-ray from Echo Bridge and then Lionsgate before Miramax's rights expired. A lot of people never got one, so it makes sense that it is getting a solo release.
User avatar
knives
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 10:49 pm

Re: 1254 Godzilla vs. Biollante

#6 Post by knives »

This isn’t a great Godzilla film, but it’s still very good with a lot to offer from a viewing.
User avatar
CSM126
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 12:22 pm
Location: The Room
Contact:

Re: 1254 Godzilla vs. Biollante

#7 Post by CSM126 »

I have the Echo Bridge disc (and had no idea it was rare). I like this movie. It’s bonkers for sure but that’s in a good, entertaining way. The creature itself is lovely and imaginative. The extras sound good (a new commentary is a nice surprise), so I might scoop this up some day.
User avatar
yoloswegmaster
Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2016 7:57 pm

Re: 1254 Godzilla vs. Biollante

#8 Post by yoloswegmaster »

Per Jim Cirronella, the English dub will not be added to this release due to Toho

Image
User avatar
EddieLarkin
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2012 2:25 pm

Re: 1254 Godzilla vs. Biollante

#9 Post by EddieLarkin »

What is the logic here? There is only one Biollante English dub and it was commissioned by Toho themselves. It is not like many of the Showa era films, which had both "official" Toho English dubs and separate USA dubs, the latter of which Toho would like to see buried forever.

And of course, Toho allowed the previous Blu-ray to carry it.
Orlac
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 8:29 am

Re: 1254 Godzilla vs. Biollante

#10 Post by Orlac »

Maybe the problem is that it was on the previous blu-ray? Toho wouldn't let Criterion have the dubs for the three titles Kraken had previously released either - lord knows why.
sabbath
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2014 10:29 am

Re: 1254 Godzilla vs. Biollante

#11 Post by sabbath »

From the other forum:
The thing is, Toho commissioned that dub and gave it to Miramax. They should technically own it. Either Miramax never sent back the dub elements or this is some weird case like the dubs for Ebirah/Hedorah/Gigan being allowed on the Kraken Blu-rays but not Criterion's. (original post)
Once again, Miramax's rights expired and GvB is individual because it's the only Heisei film Toho has a 4K transfer for ATM. Had Paramount still control GvB, Criterion probably would have included the dub and more extras since Toho's only involvement was supplying the transfer like they did for the Echo Bridge release.

As for Toho's exclusion of dubs, the vast majority they originally commissioned in Hong Kong, its down to them not having available elements and in some cases the ownership rights being held by different companies (despite long loosing their rights to the films themselves).

The real reason why Godzilla 1985 can't be included on modern releases is because Toho owns the Godzilla property including any reedits and adaptations, but does not own things used that are still under copyright. Meanwhile, Lakeshore Entertainment (who controls the post-1984 catalog of distributor New World Pictures) owns the score that was lifted from another New World title called Def-Con-4 but not the rights to the adaptation itself. (original post)
Orlac
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 8:29 am

Re: 1254 Godzilla vs. Biollante

#12 Post by Orlac »

sabbath wrote: Sun Dec 15, 2024 3:13 am From the other forum:
The thing is, Toho commissioned that dub and gave it to Miramax. They should technically own it. Either Miramax never sent back the dub elements or this is some weird case like the dubs for Ebirah/Hedorah/Gigan being allowed on the Kraken Blu-rays but not Criterion's. (original post)
Once again, Miramax's rights expired and GvB is individual because it's the only Heisei film Toho has a 4K transfer for ATM. Had Paramount still control GvB, Criterion probably would have included the dub and more extras since Toho's only involvement was supplying the transfer like they did for the Echo Bridge release.

As for Toho's exclusion of dubs, the vast majority they originally commissioned in Hong Kong, its down to them not having available elements and in some cases the ownership rights being held by different companies (despite long loosing their rights to the films themselves).

The real reason why Godzilla 1985 can't be included on modern releases is because Toho owns the Godzilla property including any reedits and adaptations, but does not own things used that are still under copyright. Meanwhile, Lakeshore Entertainment (who controls the post-1984 catalog of distributor New World Pictures) owns the score that was lifted from another New World title called Def-Con-4 but not the rights to the adaptation itself. (original post)
Unless there is something weird in the contract with Miramax, Toho probably should have rights to the dub as they created it.

Mind you, Toho's handling of the dubs they give companies is a bit weird at times. On the 2016 Kraken release of RETURN OF GODZILLA, the film before BIOLLANTE, the dub is Toho's English dub from the time of the film's creation, but it's a new mix welding the dub to the music-and-effects track from the Japanese stereo release, rather than the mono track (preserved on the 1998 UK VHS) as originally created. Some sound effects and music cues are different including Godzi
Spoiler
lla's "dying scream."
Orlac
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 8:29 am

Re: 1254 Godzilla vs. Biollante

#13 Post by Orlac »

sabbath wrote: Sun Dec 15, 2024 3:13 am From the other forum:
The thing is, Toho commissioned that dub and gave it to Miramax. They should technically own it. Either Miramax never sent back the dub elements or this is some weird case like the dubs for Ebirah/Hedorah/Gigan being allowed on the Kraken Blu-rays but not Criterion's. (original post)
Once again, Miramax's rights expired and GvB is individual because it's the only Heisei film Toho has a 4K transfer for ATM. Had Paramount still control GvB, Criterion probably would have included the dub and more extras since Toho's only involvement was supplying the transfer like they did for the Echo Bridge release.

As for Toho's exclusion of dubs, the vast majority they originally commissioned in Hong Kong, its down to them not having available elements and in some cases the ownership rights being held by different companies (despite long loosing their rights to the films themselves).

The real reason why Godzilla 1985 can't be included on modern releases is because Toho owns the Godzilla property including any reedits and adaptations, but does not own things used that are still under copyright. Meanwhile, Lakeshore Entertainment (who controls the post-1984 catalog of distributor New World Pictures) owns the score that was lifted from another New World title called Def-Con-4 but not the rights to the adaptation itself. (original post)
Unless there is something weird in the contract with Miramax, Toho probably should have rights to the dub as they created it.

Mind you, Toho's handling of the dubs they give companies is a bit weird at times. On the 2016 Kraken release of RETURN OF GODZILLA, the film before BIOLLANTE, the dub is Toho's English dub from the time of the film's creation, but it's a new mix welding the dub to the music-and-effects track from the Japanese stereo release, rather than the mono track (preserved on the 1998 UK VHS) as originally created. Some sound effects and music cues are different including Godzi
Spoiler
lla's "dying scream."
Orlac
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 8:29 am

Re: 1254 Godzilla vs. Biollante

#14 Post by Orlac »

midnitedave wrote: Fri Dec 13, 2024 5:00 pm
soundchaser wrote: Fri Dec 13, 2024 4:45 pm I haven’t seen any of the Heisei era Godzillas, but my understanding is they’re all sort of linked? Why would you do a box set for Showa but not these?
You're correct, all the Heisei era Godzillas follow a story arc with reoccurring characters. I suspect since the rights for Biollante were tied up with Miramax, there may have been a limitation preventing it from being included with a boxset (please correct me if I'm mistaken, anyone). Additionally, since this was the sole Heisei era title to be OOP, it makes it a no-brainer to release ASAP.

Update: Correction, Biollante isn't the only Heisei era title to be OOP but it was fetching the highest prices on eBay. So, demand was up there.
In the UK, the only Heiseis on VHS was the 1984 RETURN OF GODZILLA, then VS KING GHIDORAH and VS MOTHRA. Therefore, it was very odd to me when about an hour into the second (i.e. third) movie, they suddenly started talking about a prominent character having a psychic link with Godzilla, which was established in BIOLLANTE.

Also, Manga Video, who released the two VS films in the UK, clearly didn't watch the films, as their trailers and video sleeve blurbs have Godzilla as the hero!
Will the earth be ripped apart by Mothra, or will Godzilla once more save the day?
ComradeMisato
Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2019 5:31 pm

Re: 1254 Godzilla vs. Biollante

#15 Post by ComradeMisato »

Reviving kind of an old thread, but have there been any other cases of "New English subtitle translations" not really being new? The subs on this release are a moderately cleaned-up version of the earlier Criterion Channel/Janus theatrical subs, which were themselves some kind of variation on the same basic text as the Echo Bridge subs, which are largely based on, or somehow related to, the English dub.
User avatar
omegadirective
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2021 11:34 pm

Re: 1254 Godzilla vs. Biollante

#16 Post by omegadirective »

Holy crap this movies looks good on 4K.
I've never seen it before, and it did look a little over-white balanced, but guess that's how they want it to look.
But holy crap its a sharp image.
Post Reply