22 Summertime

Discuss releases by Criterion and the films on them. Threads may contain spoilers!
Message
Author
Jonathan S
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2008 7:31 am
Location: Somerset, England

Re: 22 Summertime

#51 Post by Jonathan S »

Matt wrote: Tue Jan 16, 2024 2:21 am ... the Criterion “about the transfer” note on the Blu-ray mentions “the 35 mm original camera negative”—singular—and not “negatives” or “three-strip negatives.” And yet there is this other, difficult to parse statement: “duplicate shots had been inserted into the negative, and for those segments the 35 mm yellow, cyan, and magenta separation masters were used.” Separation masters (aka YCMs) would generally only have been made from a monopack negative as preservation elements.
Just for comparison and the historical record (I assume this info was deleted from the first post when the Bluray was announced), Criterion's original 1998 DVD sleeve said
This new digital transfer was created from a new 35mm internegative. The internegative was created from the separate yellow, cyan and magenta 35mm Technicolor positives.
The 1998 sleeve also refers to "Jack Hildyard's glorious Technicolor photography" which is arguably misleading. I think that sort of phrase often being applied to the film is one reason I always assumed it was shot in three-strip Technicolor. But, besides the fact that would have been quite unusual in 1955 (only about a dozen such films released that year), I suspect the cumbersome size of the three-strip cameras was a factor in Lean's choice of Eastmancolor. If they still weighed 400-500 pounds, it would have made it much more difficult to shoot a film entirely on location in Venice, including shots from small boats.
User avatar
otis
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 3:43 pm

Re: 22 Summertime

#52 Post by otis »

Here are a couple of behind-the-scenes photos. Can anyone identify the cameras being used?
Spoiler
Image
Image
User avatar
Matt
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 4:58 pm

Re: 22 Summertime

#53 Post by Matt »

I’m pretty useless at identifying cameras, but I’m somewhat certain the smaller camera in the second picture is an Arriflex 35mm with a small (400 ft?) magazine:

Image

No idea on the first picture, but my guess is it’s some model of Mitchell:
Summer Madness (1955), made entirely on location in Venice, benefited greatly from the new single-strip Eastman Color negative which could be used with a regular Mitchell camera.
Stefan Andersson
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2007 5:02 am

Re: 22 Summertime

#54 Post by Stefan Andersson »

Summertime is showing at this year´s Ritrovato.

Restoration info:
"Courtesy Tigon Film Distributors and Hollywood Classics International. Summertime (1955) was restored in 2003 by the Academy Film Archive and the British Film Institute with the support of the David Lean Foundation."

https://festival.ilcinemaritrovato.it/e ... ummertime/
User avatar
JamesF
Label Representative
Joined: Thu Mar 04, 2010 5:36 pm

Re: 22 Summertime

#55 Post by JamesF »

Stefan Andersson wrote: Wed Jun 25, 2025 4:28 pm Summertime is showing at this year´s Ritrovato.

Restoration info:
"Courtesy Tigon Film Distributors and Hollywood Classics International. Summertime (1955) was restored in 2003 by the Academy Film Archive and the British Film Institute with the support of the David Lean Foundation."

https://festival.ilcinemaritrovato.it/e ... ummertime/
Just to confirm, Summertime was screened from a 35mm print (presumably from 2003 as stated above), not a new digital restoration.
User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:25 pm
Location: SLC, UT

Re: 22 Summertime

#56 Post by swo17 »

For anyone wondering, the Summertime disc in Imprint's David Lean Vol. 2 set looks about the same as the Criterion (it even begins with a Janus logo). There is also an option to watch the film in its "original widescreen ratio" which looks like it's just cropping off the top and bottom of the image
Post Reply