Backrooms (Kane Parsons, 2026)

Discuss specific films and franchises
Message
Author
User avatar
colinr0380
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 8:30 pm
Location: Chapel-en-le-Frith, Derbyshire, UK

Re: Backrooms (Kane Parsons, 2026)

#26 Post by colinr0380 »

cantinflas wrote: Thu May 07, 2026 4:34 am Enjoyed this convo between Parsons and Wan
I do really like the brief shout out to the Nexpo and Night Mind channels that Parsons does in their discussion (I guess he could probably not really say the name "Wendigoon" with a straight face on an A24 podcast at James Wan!), because it does show how important the response of the internet was to how a lot of these series work over time and how the commentary community are another vitally important layer in keeping the mystery of a lot of these web series alive. The Backrooms series was not too convoluted aside from having some unlisted video links in their descriptions and being uploaded in random order of when the events occurred in the timeline of the story, but when you get to ARG series like Marble Hornets or Everyman Hybrid (both of which grew out of the Slender Man mythos), which were heavily relying on audiences to work out clues that would guide the ongoing narrative based on that participation; or series that took place on inherently ephemeral platforms for added immediacy and verisimilitude such as the TikTok-based 10 Tapes or the Twitter-set The Sun Vanished, that is where a channel like Night Mind becomes essential in preserving the in the moment experience in a more permanent manner for future audiences.

(And that reminded me of what may be the most fascinating example of one of these series that went from internet to film and back again, Ted's Caving Journal, which started out as an early 2000s Angelfire blog, was turned into a long forgotten 2015 film (which may be the exact kind of thing that Parsons was worried about happening to any film adaptation of the Backrooms), and then a couple of years back got adapted into a much more faithful to the original blog web-based series!)

It is also important to note that whilst the Backrooms came out of that one image above, Parsons throughout the series was including references to many of the other notable liminal images throughout the found footage videos especially, creating connections between the various otherwise disparate images during the exploration of the environments, so that works as its own kind of kind of small ARG Easter Egg game dotted throughout his videos for viewers looking for those particular aspects.

That probably plays into the most heartening aspect of the discussion for the upcoming film, which is the way that Parsons talks about how important capturing what would normally in filmmaking would be considered irrelevant details were in this production, probably because he knows from the shorts (as in the talk about wanting to create something that can be pored over) that all the tiny details are what inspires the most speculation and discussion, and keeps the world of a film alive beyond just its theatrical release period, and that it is important to 'play fair' as much as possible. Because that is what will keep the audience engaged and in the world of the film, even if just on a subliminal level (that probably plays into the talk of his preferring a more 'grounded' and 'sci-fi' planned out approach to horror, as compared to a religious and supernatural 'anything goes' one). And due to being relatively more comfortable with that world building aspect that he was using the film as an opportunity to do things he could not with the shorts, and work with actors on creating characters that are existing beyond the more first person perspective of just putting the audience directly into the experience. That feels like the aspect that he was already pushing towards in earnest with "Found Footage 3", and may be the most important aspect that this film could bring to this series on top of creating actual physical sets to get lost inside.

Incidentally, the 7th was its premiere in L.A., so we should be getting some first impressions of the film appearing soon...
Last edited by colinr0380 on Thu May 14, 2026 3:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
colinr0380
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 8:30 pm
Location: Chapel-en-le-Frith, Derbyshire, UK

Re: Backrooms (Kane Parsons, 2026)

#27 Post by colinr0380 »

Another teaser with more footage and including the "Still Life" track from Found Footage 3, and a DJ set from Instupendo.

Katherine Isabelle (Ginger Snaps, American Mary, Margot Verger from the Hannibal TV series) is in the cast too. And I wonder if the reason why Mark Duplass and a few of the other actor's roles remain blank on the film's imdb page is that they are trying to keep the Async material more low key in the marketing, emphasising the horror angle more. Plus, if any familiar character names from the web series appear there (such as Peter Tench or Marvin), then that could spoil the reveal!
User avatar
cantinflas
Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2007 5:48 am
Location: sydney

Re: Backrooms (Kane Parsons, 2026)

#29 Post by cantinflas »

Damn you've dug deep, colin! Love it all and looking forward to reading your thoughts on the film.

Only a week to go, hoping for a wonderfully trippy big screen experience.
User avatar
colinr0380
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 8:30 pm
Location: Chapel-en-le-Frith, Derbyshire, UK

Re: Backrooms (Kane Parsons, 2026)

#30 Post by colinr0380 »

Thanks cantinflas! Incidentally my favourite example to explain 'noclipping' and showing off the exposed level geometry of a game to the player (which is eerily similar to a moment of showing the 'City' that briefly occurs in Found Footage 3) to anyone who is not familiar with the term has to be the moment that occurs during the much missed Super Best Friends channel's playthrough of Stairs.
User avatar
colinr0380
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 8:30 pm
Location: Chapel-en-le-Frith, Derbyshire, UK

Re: Backrooms (Kane Parsons, 2026)

#31 Post by colinr0380 »

Christy Lemire (previously one of the hosts on the Roger Ebert show) has surprisingly popped up in my feed with a brief early reaction to the film. Her co-host Alonso Duralde commenting that it is "Like a cross between Skinamarink and Synechdoche, New York but with the wit and whimsy replaced with horror" is quite a sentence, as is "the apotheosis of A24 horror"!

Also don't look up the BBFC's Content Advice for the film because it is going to spoil on some of the events that occur, but I did have to share this amusing bit where they rated the film at 3 out of 5 on their "Sex" scale because:
BBFC wrote:A person makes a joke using the term 'kinky'.
Which is somewhat appropriate given one of Ejiofor's better known film roles was in Kinky Boots!
User avatar
dda1996a
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2015 10:14 am

Re: Backrooms (Kane Parsons, 2026)

#32 Post by dda1996a »

Watched it yesterday, and I must say I am deeply dissapointed.
I have yet to finish the YouTube series (I am at 15/22), but everything that made the videos great (undefined horror, focus on the impossible cognitive mapping of the limial spaces) gets chucked aside in the film for an "elevated" psychological idiocy, as de rigour for an A24 film.

I will say so, there is a brilliant part of the film, where the VHS found-footage aesthethics is maintained, that was just as good if not better than the first video.

I won't spoil what happens exactly, and again I'm not sure if answers are given in the remaining videos I have to watch, but this need to create psychological characters with motives and backstories is the last thing I needed from a Backrooms film.
User avatar
Mr.DarjeelingLimited
Joined: Wed Dec 13, 2023 6:58 pm

Re: Backrooms (Kane Parsons, 2026)

#33 Post by Mr.DarjeelingLimited »

Two thumbs up from me. See it for Renate Reinsve and Chiwetel Ejiofor’s great performances stay for the absolute dreadful feelings it invokes
User avatar
colinr0380
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 8:30 pm
Location: Chapel-en-le-Frith, Derbyshire, UK

Re: Backrooms (Kane Parsons, 2026)

#34 Post by colinr0380 »

Well, if there had to be one film to get me into the cinema for the first time in just under 26 years it would be this one! I liked the film a lot, but at the same time I can entirely understand some of the split reactions to the film. I went into the film expecting a bit more sci-fi with my horror, with an edge of psychology, and instead got a film that went full bore into a critique of psychologically damaged people presuming to be in a position to themselves be able to psychoanalyse others. Spoilers from this point on, but the basic point I will be making is that it’s a really good film, but don’t go in expecting it to be in quite the same vein as the web series. Its canon but a weird very civilian-focused branch of it. If the Backrooms in the web series was engineering-centric, in the sense of ‘managing’ the problem of the Backrooms; this is applied philosophy, where its about what the Backrooms mean to those who enter it.
Spoiler
Its really a film about how the ‘talking cure’ cannot be the be all and end all, especially in a situation where you are literally inside someone else’s psychic manifestations! And in the end its all about getting to the point where the Therapist has to break from her calm demeanour and bluntly say to her patient (in the funniest line of the film) that: “It’s all in your brain, dipshit!” (I do wonder what that Euro Brady guy would make of it!)

One of the criticisms I have heard about the film is that it keeps breaking the tension of the Backrooms by continually going back not just to the ‘real world’ but inside the memories of the Renate Reinsve character, Mary. But that turns out to be fundamental to the theme of the film because the psychology of both Clark and Mary (nobody else really matters in this film, especially anything to do with Async, despite their presence topping and tailing this otherwise self-contained story) is getting ‘liberated’ in a strange way by the Backrooms.

Clark is the main character for the majority of the film, but ends up going from powerless victim of his collapsing marriage and failing furniture store (and lost dream of being an architect) to suddenly being liberated with his discovery of the Backrooms, to the extent that he becomes the villain of the piece (one of the best call backs to the web series is to that final shot of Static Dead End, with the wooden chair sitting on a small hillock in the middle of a room, which gets turned into an opulent Royal purple coloured throne here). It is an open question of whether he actively lures his two companions on the expedition into being a sacrifice to the environment - it plays initially like a terrible monster is preying on them, and Clark is distraught in the moment (but tellingly runs away from Kat in terror rather than trying to follow her) and we only find out later that it is a monstrous manifestation of Clark’s own psyche doing the preying.

(Incidentally I was very impressed at the moment that ends that mid-film expedition sequence because if you remember the main trailer, it ends with a brief moment of someone filmed in long shot against another wall. I had been wondering if that was showing someone else finding another entry point, but it turns out that the most creepy thing about that moment was something that was there in plain sight all along: the question of who exactly is holding the camera during that long shot. Because it ain’t any of our three characters in the Backrooms at that point in time!)

And that is countered by Mary’s own character arc, going from calm and collected Therapist to her flashbacks revealing more and more childhood trauma (we see her as a child with her mother putting handprints in concrete in front of her house, which we then jump to immediately seeing being demolished; then we get an even more revealing situation of the mother keeping Mary trapped inside the house because of the mother’s fear of the outside, taping newspapers to the windows and - Backrooms-style - putting furniture in bizarrely but purposefully arranged piles against the doors to keep out whatever intruders she is scared of getting inside), which is showing that she has just as many traumatic issues to deal with as Clark does with his failed marriage.

In a strange but fascinating way the film ends up being a battle between two psyches of our main characters within that liminal space, like a cross between The Cell (the therapist entering the mind of a madman) and One Missed Call (the way that you have a kind of Top Trumps battle of a heroine who has the past history of abuse that is able to rise to the challenge presented by a ghostly antagonist’s own anger). Whilst Clark ends up seduced by the power the environment affords him and is then killed by his own manifestation of his Captain Clark mascot that is twisted and combined with together with the rival “Big Wayne” furniture dealer as a representation of curdled ambitions; Mary instead is only able to escape through using the totem of the piece of concrete with the handprint on to bash in the Captain Clark mascot’s head!

So many films came to mind when watching, and a lot of them I did not expect to be thinking about! The ‘dinner table’ sequence is kind of astonishingly unexpected, as Mary is knocked out and tied to a chair by Clark (the losing and regaining consciousness moment is where we get the similar imagery from that first teaser trailer of the downwards movement between Mary's mother's home as it morphs and disintegrates into the Backrooms) and then he describes what he has made of the world, before they role play from their early therapy session the argument that ended his marriage one more time. Its very like the dinner scene from Texas Chain Saw Massacre with the helpless heroine, but it is also very Lynchian (which makes it amusing that Reinsve apparently told Parsons that she thought they were going into Lynch territory and Parsons had not seen Blue Velvet!), because it all takes place in a bizarrely strange ‘normality’, with onlooking figures (including a woman in a red dress!) that Clark takes a strange pleasure in cutting apart, because they are only recreations of human beings, not actual flesh and blood. But unfortunately Clark has as much trouble in controlling these figures as he did other human beings!

And then it all climaxes in a chase through the Backrooms between Mary and the Captain Clark monster which both feels as if it obviously references Kane’s Oldest View series (in the moment of having to climb stairs to an ‘exit door’ over a bottomless chasm) and in the moment of Mary struggling across a room of sofas, injuring herself in the process, reminded me both of the wire room struggle moment in Suspiria and the final pell-mell rush through the psyche in Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind simultaneously! I do also wonder what Michel Gondry makes of this film!

Following that, I loved that Mary gets out into the furniture store again, but its obviously not the actual furniture store but still inside the Backrooms, and that becomes the setting for the big showdown battle!
___

We do get what we came for in terms of the ‘found footage’ aspects. The film actually begins with the Async logo straight into what could work as its own standalone entry into the web series of an unfortunate hazmat suitor getting lost in the Backrooms and eventually grabbed and seemingly killed (a first, I think!) by a monster. Then we get Clark’s solo exploration; Clark’s exploration with Kat and Bobby (which ends badly for all); then Mary’s entry, exploration, capture and final chase. So the audience is definitely getting the material they would expect from this! And some of the negative reactions to the ‘head scratching third act’ I think are probably surrounding the introduction of the giant Captain Clark mascot as the primary antagonist, which could seem rather goofy, but with its long grasping limbs and relentless thump of its wooden leg as it chases after Mary is rather terrifying (though it does feature a comic callback to Clark’s ‘shoddy wooden leg in his advert’ during the final battle, as Mary shatters it!). And it shows that this film is surprisingly close to Kane’s Oldest View series, which had its own chasing mascot figure through that mall!

And whilst they are really (really!) lightly touched upon in this film, I did really like the way that Async was used here. The message in different languages ‘welcoming aliens to Earth’ is being played through speakers attached to the caveman standee as initially seen in Found Footage 3 and now developed into a major element here, because whilst it is not explicitly stated, it appears that Async is using the standee with the speakers attached as a device to attract whatever monsters are roaming around the general area, so that they can capture them on film. Although in this case, Async only captures Clark instead!

Mark Duplass turns up extremely briefly in the film, wordlessly looking on at the image of Clark in the Backrooms CCTV footage; then his wordless reaction of recognition when at home with his family and seeing the Captain Clark advert; and then he finally has a scene with Mary at the end when she is saved from the monster and brought back through Async’s official threshold, and is being interrogated by him. That scene is really nicely written to have the Duplass character himself talk of being enamoured by the Backrooms, and then Mary herself recognises that she is in much the same situation that Clark was, of now being the object of study herself.

The film ends with the perfect shot which suggests that anyone who has entered the Backrooms has kind of added their psyche and image into that liminal space. As with Clark having recreations of people from his mind, but the Backrooms has misremembered them into having multiple sets of eyes, or a lamp growing from their back; we end on the real Mary being out and in Async’s custody (asking what will happen to her, and as we know from what happened to Peter Tench in the web series, probably nothing good!) but also, after a succession of beautifully twisted images of all of the 'real world' locations manifesting themselves inside the Complex, it ends on the image of another Mary spawned by the Backrooms, sitting quietly in an empty room somewhere but ‘misremembered’ in almost the ultimate statement on A.I. with her covering hands having far too many fingers to properly pass!
So its definitely not what I was expecting, and I could see people being frustrated by the emphasis on psychology rather than monster mayhem. But in a way, at least to me, it does not contradict the web series at all but is rather a different angle on it. This is showing what happens when people with severe mental traumas fall into a space that simply reflects everything back at them in a skewed manner. Its not about characters behaving rationally and logically as Async representatives. And in a way it makes the Backrooms feel as if it is a film that is about how human beings cannot help but ruin simple (yet inhuman) perfection by their all too human foibles, smearing their messy psyches all across the pristine walls.
Last edited by colinr0380 on Sat May 30, 2026 5:17 pm, edited 5 times in total.
User avatar
Finch
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 9:09 pm
Location: United States

Re: Backrooms (Kane Parsons, 2026)

#35 Post by Finch »

Adam Nayman's take:
Parsons’ actual filmmaking is somehow both more accomplished and less effective than one might expect. Backrooms is extremely well-made within its limitations even as it exposes them; it exists in its own liminal space between ambitious experiment and fascinating failure.

It’s telling, perhaps, that Will Soodik’s screenplay foregrounds frustration as a theme. The protagonist is a stymied architect, Clark (Chiwetel Ejifor), who’s reduced to managing a discount furniture store in the Santa Clara Valley circa 1990. At the beginning of the film, he’s living in the showroom of what has confusingly been dubbed Captain Clark’s Ottoman Empire. A generous critic might propose that the clash between pirate and Persianate aesthetics in Clark’s homemade promotional videos—in which he dons a peg leg while comparing himself to a sultan— hint at the temporal incoherence to come. Clark is separated from his wife and drinking heavily; his only outlet for catharsis are weekly sessions with a therapist, Mary (Renate Reinsve) who encourages role play and asks him to take accountability for his actions. Where Clark is defined by his store’s forlorn simulacrum of domesticity, Mary’s curiosity and perceptiveness—and her own desire for escape— are suggested by the title of her book: The Window Within.

Clark finds a window, alright—or rather a doorway—embedded in a blank, porous section of the drywall in the store’s basement. (He discovers it by accident while fiddling around with the electrical panel; the glimmers of light bleeding through the gypsum and illuminating the passageway make for a memorably eerie early image.) After a few solo forays into the Backrooms, where he starts mapping the area’s dimensions and hears but does not see evidence of other occupants. Clark recruits a pair of minimum-wage employees (Finn Bennett and Lukitia Maxwell) to help out with a filmed expedition. Suffice it to say that it does not go well, and also that Mary—whom Clark had told briefly about the Backrooms, and who otherwise seems to spend her time mournfully flashing back to an unhappy childhood spent shut-in with her mentally ill mother—resolves to go looking for her disappeared patient.

Up until this point, about a third of the way into the film, Parsons is on relatively familiar territory. He may be young, but he’s already a veteran at strategic withholding, and when Clark and his team start exploring, we might as well be in one of the original lo-fi shorts—except that there’s occasionally an Academy Award nominee visible within the bobbing, handheld frames. Where Parsons has to take a leap—and where he swiftly loses his footing—is in showing us what is actually happening in the Backrooms, which has little chance of living up to several years’ worth of carefully cultivated ambiguities; the revelations are somehow too much (stilted, clichéd dialogue) and not enough (a lack of real scares).

That Parsons is trying to place his opus above cheap jolts is fair enough. This is a less assaultive viewing experience than Obsession, which really does a number on the audience (exemplified by a certain notorious set piece testifying, with a smirk, to Barker’s blunt-force approach). But his restraint also points up a certain lack of ruthlessness, or killer instinct. Horror cannot live on vibes alone, or else said vibes have to be immaculately bad: rancid, unsettling, unfathomable. Take, for instance, Kyle Edward Ball’s Skinamarink, which threads a similar strand analog nostalgia through a murky, nocturnal child’s-eye perspective; its plotting is even vaguer than Backrooms, but the fears it accesses are simultaneously more universal and precise. Parsons never works up the compulsive terror needed to justify all the surrounding obliqueness—not even with Ejiofor on good form and Reinsve doing her best to look freaked out while being pursued by what looks like a reject from the Amazing Digital Circus.

On a purely technical level, the Backrooms are an architectural marvel: 30,000 square feet of soundstage space in Vancouver, re-created to the last pixel using digital previz and tricked out with ingenious practical FX. Still, as an excursion into purgatory, Backrooms isn’t as rigorously structured as Genki Kawamura’s recent video-game adaptation Exit 8, and after a while, the piles of disused furniture lose their threatening aura. There’s nothing here as indelible as the graffiti-streaked apartment complex in Bernard Rose’s Candyman, or the Kiyoshi Kurosawa’s dilapidated warehouses, or the Overlook Hotel; the visceral and emotional stakes here lie not with the characters and their fates (as they do in those movies) but with something beyond the frame—i.e. whether the gifted kid behind the camera is able to stick the landing.

He doesn’t, and that’s OK: Like the Backrooms themselves, Backrooms will surely be interesting as a subject for further research. It’s definitely open to interpretation, depending on which pathway you want to follow: Captain Clark’s Ottoman Empire as an emblem of American decline; the Backrooms’ strangely deformed inhabitants as a symbol of A.I.’s inherently degraded forms of representation. Parsons’s reluctance to wander too far in any one direction—literally or figuratively—into his own painstakingly rendered milieu seems like a practical decision made on behalf of potential sequels rather than a sign of the narrative being steered towards its logical (or satisfying) endpoint. For all of Backrooms’ very real formal control, it’s ultimately and strangely indecisive. Instead of punctuating the action with a question mark, it leaves off with a shrug. (Say what you will about Obsession, but it’s not a movie you shake off; it leaves residue, even if it’s sleazy.) The final image of Parsons’s film is meant to suggest the grimly self-divided nature of one of his main characters; it’s striking, even if it doesn’t have much force. What it illuminates, like the light bleeding through Clark’s walls, is something else: the thin but real fracture between intention and achievement; between a movie that means to contain multitudes and one that’s somehow less than the sum of its myriad and intricate parts.
User avatar
colinr0380
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 8:30 pm
Location: Chapel-en-le-Frith, Derbyshire, UK

Re: Backrooms (Kane Parsons, 2026)

#36 Post by colinr0380 »

Also, we never really see it, but we get an allusion when Clark says that "there's even a pool!... of a kind"

I also like that the first thing Clark does when he goes through the portal is to immediately go back out of it, like any sensible person would! And Kane Parsons has talked about being influenced by the Portal video games, and that shows in the moment of post-his companions disappearing Clark desperately running through the 'behind the scenes' area of the Backrooms, which are more messy, industrial and cramped.

And also on the day before the film was released, Parsons released a new track, A Clear Blue Sky, which with its associated image of the painting of Saturn Eating His Son by Goya feels intended as another wry videogame reference, because a lot of horror games in the late 2000s/early 2010s were constantly throwing that painting into their virtually created worlds as bit of creepy set dressing (Layers of Fear was a particularly big one for doing that) to the point that it started to become a cliche, but is also just as much a very clear reference to one of the things that occurs near to the end of the film!

(Come to think of it there is an interesting parent-child, father figure-son; smothering mother-daughter thing going on throughout the film)
Last edited by colinr0380 on Mon Jun 01, 2026 5:20 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
colinr0380
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 8:30 pm
Location: Chapel-en-le-Frith, Derbyshire, UK

Re: Backrooms (Kane Parsons, 2026)

#37 Post by colinr0380 »

Continuing on music-wise, a track from Everywhere At The End of Time actually gets used at one point, and the end credits track is the latest from Boards of Canada, The Word Becomes Flesh.
User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:25 pm
Location: SLC, UT

Re: Backrooms (Kane Parsons, 2026)

#38 Post by swo17 »

...from an album that came out the same day as the movie. How long ago would the song have been incorporated into the end credits? Six weeks ago, it wasn't even common knowledge that they had new music coming!
User avatar
CSM126
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 12:22 pm
Location: The Room
Contact:

Re: Backrooms (Kane Parsons, 2026)

#39 Post by CSM126 »

This was unpleasant to watch in the best possible way - suffused with dread, and effectively triggering my own claustrophobia with all those damn hallways and no exit door in sight. Also, the general wrongness of it all (“like describing a dog to someone who’s never seen one and then asking them to draw it”, as Clark says) really made me squirm. Uncanny valley effect in at design: what a concept.

I know nothing of the creepypasta beyond the original photo and the general idea of “a place outside of reality”, but this still worked like gangbusters on me. I was both repulsed and also leaning in closer to try and glean more information throughout its runtime, fascinated and horrified at the same time. That’s fun to me. I appreciate them letting the backrooms just be a horrible place with no explanation rather than trying to give it an origin; that would just be dull.

The acting is very good and the creatures are fun too.
Spoiler
Am i correct to presume that Captain Clark was a practical puppet and not a CGI effect? It had a wonderful tactile, rubbery look and feel to it that made it so much creepier than a smooth, clean animation ever could. Loved it!
Also, was it just me or was
Spoiler
the bathroom and pools area reminiscent of the Pools liminal space video game. I’ve only watched play throughs of that but found it very frightening all the same and it was neat to see something like that brought to life, if briefly.
User avatar
dda1996a
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2015 10:14 am

Re: Backrooms (Kane Parsons, 2026)

#40 Post by dda1996a »

colinr0380 wrote: Fri May 29, 2026 10:56 pm . I went into the film expecting a bit more sci-fi with my horror, with an edge of psychology, and instead got a film that went full bore into a critique of psychologically damaged people presuming to be in a position to themselves be able to psychoanalyse others. Spoilers from this point on, but the basic point I will be making is that it’s a really good film, but don’t go in expecting it to be in quite the same vein as the web series. Its canon but a weird very civilian-focused branch of it. If the Backrooms in the web series was engineering-centric, in the sense of ‘managing’ the problem of the Backrooms; this is applied philosophy, where its about what the Backrooms mean to those who enter it.

So its definitely not what I was expecting, and I could see people being frustrated by the emphasis on psychology rather than monster mayhem. But in a way, at least to me, it does not contradict the web series at all but is rather a different angle on it. This is showing what happens when people with severe mental traumas fall into a space that simply reflects everything back at them in a skewed manner. Its not about characters behaving rationally and logically as Async representatives. And in a way it makes the Backrooms feel as if it is a film that is about how human beings cannot help but ruin simple (yet inhuman) perfection by their all too human foibles, smearing their messy psyches all across the pristine walls.
I didn't mind it moving from the very abstract web-series (even though all the async videos are far from being non-psychological). But A) human-centered pop pscyhology was the last thing I wanted out of the backrooms B) I think this is a very bad example of psychological horror.
Granted I admire the series very much and belive Parsons has a lot of talent, but both the script and his direction of anything that is character-centered (as opposed to world building) is very lacking, giving a very student film vibe (those scenes between Ejiofor & Reinsve are just very pedestrian). Especially all those flashbacks which are so on the nose!

I'll throw in some more theoretical thoughts I have on the Backrooms themselves and why I loved it so much - which is also why I disliked everything the film tried to do in its last 1/3 or so. spoilers:
Spoiler
A lot of my thoughts are related to things I've been reading lately, but I couldn't help but see the Backrooms through a very sociopolitical lens - as a mix of hauntology and post-capitalism made concrete.
I couldn't not see the backrooms as capitalism reaching its breakdown (as some accelerationists might argue) - where human greed and capitalist ventures reach a strage where everything left is simply empty. This is further connected through the part in the series that shows Async advertising the backrooms as the new, endless storage place for everything.

just like the old office designs in severence, the empty, liminal empty-corporate office spaces of the backrooms give us both the feeling of timelessness, while the date of the series (early 90s) with the VHS aesthetic connects with Mark Fisher's hauntology definition - lost futures continue to haunt the present, the era before capitalism became the reality of the entire world. the time where we still believed it won't be too late to change it, when contemporary society feels unable to imagine fundamentally different futures

As such, the ghosts haunting our presents are also the ghosts haunting the backrooms. Is there something more freightening than hearing things you can't see in places that don't make logical sense anymore? the backrooms could easily be related to Fisher's conception of Eerie places, and also Frederic Jameson's conception of post-modernist architecture. just look at those endless office buildings seen through the windows in Found Footage 3. we are lost in the backrooms, unable to cognitively map ourselves in that space because this is the feeling of trying to exist in our current, neo-liberal digital reality.

I think this is what has fascinated me so much with all these liminal spaces projects, and especially the backrooms. and as such, the last thing I wanted for it was to degenerate into personal, character-based "psychopathology" in which the backrooms just echo the characters unstable minds. And even at that, I think they could have made something much more unsettling. I'm currently reading JG Ballard's Atrocity Exhibition and his sense of psychopathology and connecting landscapes into characters' mental breakdowns are much more visceral and upsetting.
Anyway, this was my take, very cerebral and academic but also worked well to set the stage for what made the backrooms also so scray, for me.
User avatar
colinr0380
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 8:30 pm
Location: Chapel-en-le-Frith, Derbyshire, UK

Re: Backrooms (Kane Parsons, 2026)

#41 Post by colinr0380 »

I would definitely recommend the Jonathan Weiss adaptation of Ballard's The Atrocity] Exhibition to you dda1996a! (If there is a way of picking up the 2005 Reel 23 DVD edition of it, that also comes with a commentary track between Weiss and Ballard over the first hour or so of the film) That feels like it would be much more up your alley, as it stays really faithful to the spirit of the Ballard book, and interestingly compares to the 'role play' aspect in Backrooms because it splits its action up into various thematic sections that re-casts all of the characters into new roles in our main characters explorations to find some sort of underlying meaning in the madness of the 20th century.

Your comment on the Backrooms film did make me wonder if it also works in highlighting a really current trend (and one I am feeling myself quite keenly at the moment) where the contours of world as we understood it - of relationships, employment, fulfilment - is in the process of being so brutally overturned by new developments that suddenly upend every notion of how things were 'supposed' to be, and leave people unmoored from any stability in the wake of such ructions (organisationally as well, with Async starting out as an MRI company before moving into... whatever new field for exploitation that the Backrooms represent. They have gone from simply mapping the pre-existing in more and more detail and clarity to forging ahead into the unknown on their own, and potentially just losing themselves in their own self-created delusions). In that sense I do feel a lot for Clark in the film, as someone who lost a purpose in life (and becomes bitter at helping others to achieve their dreams whilst his own curdle, even if their dream may just be to buy some furniture!), and then from out of nowhere finds a space to dream again. It is a strangely cathartic (if traumatic) film for both characters in some ways, but that strange kind of disturbing catharsis (as say occurs at the end of Todd Haynes' [Safe]) where it is a willing retreat from facing the world entirely, but one that cannot really end well because of that self-same isolation not allowing for the potential of at some point actually coming to terms with the real issues underneath the surface.
User avatar
dda1996a
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2015 10:14 am

Re: Backrooms (Kane Parsons, 2026)

#42 Post by dda1996a »

I think so very much. I think you can also see it in the large amount of YouTube creators breaking into cinema so much recently, almost all with horror films.
I also think horror in general (while always mostly successful) as a genre has been making itself the new current genre.
With slow cinema ending as the current stylistic aesthethic, I think we've been mainly getting interesting works in either horror, or to a lesser degree the "cinema of hyper-nervousness" of people like Sean Baker, Safdies and those in their orbits. And it makes sense in lieu of what we both wrote.
User avatar
colinr0380
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 8:30 pm
Location: Chapel-en-le-Frith, Derbyshire, UK

Re: Backrooms (Kane Parsons, 2026)

#43 Post by colinr0380 »

I have been watching a lot of reaction videos over the last day or so (whilst finishing my giant popcorn bucket at my computer, since I only got about halfway through it during the film itself!), and there were a couple of comments below the penguinz0 video that I found really helpful and wanted to highlight, since I am worried that I will lose them otherwise. I will spoiler tag them because they are getting into the ending with Clark and the "Still Life" figures:
Spoiler
@-citrus-1547 wrote:(Spoilers) I had this convo with my bf after the movie. I believe the Pirate Clark reveal was perfect because of what he represents. I pointed out that in the first session Clark makes a short comment that he “doesn’t bother getting too close to people because he hurts them” and Mary points out that deep inside Clark feels alone. Pirate Clark looks desperate and afraid when Mary is out of his reach because Pirate Clark doesn't want to be alone but we know, like Clark, when he gets close enough he’ll hurt her. When Clark sent his voice message to Mary he talked about “opening the window and not coming back” which we know is him talking about the backrooms, but also referencing Mary’s audiobook. Opening up the window is the about finding your freedom. Clark thinks he found his freedom in the backrooms but that isn’t true. Clark needs to change to be free but his refusal to do so is what keeps him static in his suffering or what keeps him in the backrooms. He would rather stay alone with his “husks” than confront the reality that he needs to put in the effort to change. Despite what Clark says he WANTS to change and we can see that when he parks outside Barbara’s house, but he’s afraid to put in the effort. He accepts the backrooms as his comfort, he accepts that he’s alone with his husks and his own reflection (Pirate Clark), and in an odd way he “kills himself” when he believes the idea that “it’s just how he was wired”. Clark was his own worst enemy just like how he was his own monster. Clark knew he hurt people when he got too close to them but instead of changing that he took the route of “it’s just who I am”.
@joebordeleau8892 wrote: (All Theory) There's a huge element to this film that people aren't getting. At the end, we see Mary beat the Captain with the rock, we also see her destroy his peg leg. He hollers as he falls to the ground, as well as reacts every time he is hit with the stone, and eventually gets knocked away. I think its a fair to say that he indeed feels a version of "pain" with that, and "fear" when he is falling down from the broken leg. We also see the Female Still Life with the red hair run and hide from the Captain when he shows up. It was demonstrated that Clark was an abusive drunk, and his wife had enough. I'm thinking the still life woman is a recreation of his wife, and her "normal reaction" that she remembers from real life, is fearing "Clark" i.e the Captain here. All of this to say, Clark says that the Still Lives don't feel pain, but that isn't true necessarily; they just may not demonstrate the fact that they are feeling pain. Clark couldn't tell for years that his wife was in pain over his selfish bullshit, and only thinks about that one night; How breaking a glass woke her up, and that he had too many beers; she couldn't possibly actually have been feeling things for years, but if it isn't obvious to Clark, then it "isn't happening". I think the entities as a whole do experience pain, death, unconsciousness, at least in a similar way to humans. How would the Captain have been sedated/killed if this weren't the case? How could he bleed?
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: Backrooms (Kane Parsons, 2026)

#44 Post by domino harvey »

$81 million dollar domestic opening is insane
User avatar
Never Cursed
Such is life on board the Redoutable
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2016 4:22 am

Re: Backrooms (Kane Parsons, 2026)

#45 Post by Never Cursed »

I assume this is gonna be A24's highest grossing movie of all time, wow. Between this and Obsession, the smaller-scale horror movies have completely obliterated the latest Star Wars movie
User avatar
colinr0380
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 8:30 pm
Location: Chapel-en-le-Frith, Derbyshire, UK

Re: Backrooms (Kane Parsons, 2026)

#46 Post by colinr0380 »

Yes, apparently the previous biggest opening for A24 was Alex Garland's Civil War film and that had an opening weekend of just over $25 million according to imdb, and was made at a budget of $50 million, so five times the budget of Backrooms.

I don't really know enough about how cinemas do things to know if this is the norm (and this is UK related, so not affecting the US situation anyway) but when I booked my ticket just under a fortnight ago there were just three screenings on Friday 29th, and then it was only going to show on a single screen after that for the rest of the week. When I went to the cinema's website to do a last check on my seat being booked on Friday afternoon, I saw that it is getting multiple showings every day of next week now.
User avatar
colinr0380
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 8:30 pm
Location: Chapel-en-le-Frith, Derbyshire, UK

Re: Backrooms (Kane Parsons, 2026)

#47 Post by colinr0380 »

User avatar
Murdoch
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 3:59 am
Location: Upstate NY

Re: Backrooms (Kane Parsons, 2026)

#48 Post by Murdoch »

This was quite impressive. I saw it opening day and had a few qualms, but the more it wanders around in my head the more positive I am about it. It feels like an amalgamation of the many backrooms media circulating online and those montages of 90s nostalgia, with a bored dissatisfaction hanging over the two leads that feels right at home in the film's decade of choice.

Parsons is a very gifted tilmmaker, and not just when delving into the horror of the film (although there are several very effective moments which work not because of what's shown, but how it's shown)
Spoiler
For example, the Clark monster is a fairly cartoonish exaggeration in form, but the moment where Mary discovers the interior of the backrooms replica of the Ottoman Empire furniture store, finds the exit leads to nowhere, and turns to see the Clark monster entering from the stairwell was very chilling. Not because the Clark monster was particularly frightening, but the way the camera captures Mary's perspective as the monster enters at the far end of the store and doesn't immediately zoom or cut, but just keeps the viewer in her perspective made that scene.
While the psychology of the film is fairly rudimentary (at least in Clark's case, who checks all the boxes for any male horror video game protagonist seen since Silent Hill 2), Parsons demonstrates a sorrow for Clark and Mary that makes them more fleshed out than the tropes that form their outline. In a promotional interview for the film he spoke of the political subtext present, and you can see it in the various set design outside the backrooms - the repeated isolated images of vacated retail, the bland, interior spaces that feel as if they're draining the life of their occupants. Parsons crafts a world where the backrooms feel inviting, while the world outside feels like it's evaporating.

Also, as someone who had been fascinated by the various backrooms media that populates the web, I loved how the film explored the impossible spaces but didn't fall into the trap of making them illogical and random. There's an order to this underworld, which makes sense given the production dedicated itself to constricting about 30,000 square feet of sets for the film.
User avatar
cantinflas
Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2007 5:48 am
Location: sydney

Re: Backrooms (Kane Parsons, 2026)

#49 Post by cantinflas »

colinr0380 wrote: Fri May 29, 2026 10:56 pm Well, if there had to be one film to get me into the cinema for the first time in just under 26 years it would be this one!
That's incredible colin, must've felt like a backrooms trip in itself!

Man I loved everything about the film, especially the sets and production design and how it all felt so handmade. I went along for the ride and even though I'd seen the series I had no idea where it was going to go and could not have expected this turn of events even if I tried. I gather it's Jungian in how it taps into concepts of archetype and the shadow and the backrooms materialises them. Despite everything it's such an alluring space in there I can't wait to go back in be it revisiting the series and this film many times or seeing where he takes it. Apparently he already knows how it all ends.
colinr0380 wrote: Sun May 31, 2026 5:39 pm I don't really know enough about how cinemas do things to know if this is the norm (and this is UK related, so not affecting the US situation anyway) but when I booked my ticket just under a fortnight ago there were just three screenings on Friday 29th, and then it was only going to show on a single screen after that for the rest of the week. When I went to the cinema's website to do a last check on my seat being booked on Friday afternoon, I saw that it is getting multiple showings every day of next week now.
If it's anything like here, that's normal because they make tickets available a few weeks in advance with a couple of daily screenings for the week after opening day. Then on the Monday of the week it opens they make all the screenings available so suddenly you see heaps for the next week.

Btw have you seen Iron Lung yet? It's finally on YouTube Movies after Markiplier struggled to come to terms with the archaic process to get it on there!
User avatar
colinr0380
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 8:30 pm
Location: Chapel-en-le-Frith, Derbyshire, UK

Re: Backrooms (Kane Parsons, 2026)

#50 Post by colinr0380 »

cantinflas wrote: Tue Jun 02, 2026 10:30 am
colinr0380 wrote: Fri May 29, 2026 10:56 pm Well, if there had to be one film to get me into the cinema for the first time in just under 26 years it would be this one!
That's incredible colin, must've felt like a backrooms trip in itself!
It was a bit! The last time I saw a film in the cinema was in the Summer of 2000 (i.e. when Kane Parsons was -5 years old) in the last Summer before my final year of University - I saw Chicken Run with a friend from College (which was an amusing experience to hear all the mums with their kids tutting in surprise when the farmer uttered "You little buggers!" at one point!) and later that Summer went with my parents to Cornwall where they wanted to watch Chicken Run, but I demurred and whilst they went to see that I went and watched the first X-Men film instead! (That was pretty much all I needed to see of superhero movies after that point).

The years running up to the dry spell were really full of cinema trips (Event Horizon, eXistenZ (sadly I never saw The Matrix at the cinema, but the trailer for this new "whatisthematrix.com" film about to get released was playing before eXistenZ!), Out of Sight (which had the teaser for the Gus Van Sant Psycho remake playing before it!), Galaxy Quest, Saving Private Ryan, Titanic, American Psycho, the South Park movie(!), and I'll always treasure the moment of the audience groaning in unison at the wonderfully awful "I thought Christmas only came once a year!" pun at the end of The World Is Not Enough!), but for whatever reason I just have not had the occasion to make the trip out to the cinema since starting my working life. I almost got dragged into a cinema in June 2019 (forum member Grand Wazoo knows what I'm talking about there! ;) ), but this is the first time of actually sitting through a film outside of my own home for a while. So long in fact that the cinema in Stockport where I saw Chicken Run back in 2000 has long been demolished to make way for a Holiday Inn, and a brand new cinema built just down the road, which is where I went for the screening of Backrooms on Friday! Nice wide and comfy sofa-style seats there as well, which was very different from the kind I remember having to squeeze into back in the day!

It also coincided with my final day at a place I worked at for 17 years too, and part of going to the cinema was a 'now or never' sense of doing something to take my mind off of things! Plus when I left with that Boards of Canada track ringing in my ears (I love that it plays over credits that themselves are growing bizarre extra limbs on their fonts to match the final image of the film! And that itself is something else that the advertising appears to have been alluding to, with final trailer's review quotations starting to do the same thing there! Who could have guessed that the fonts for the review quotes for the film would have been a plot element!), I was hyper-aware that I was walking past a closed furniture store just next door to the cinema complex enough to take a photo of it for posterity! (It was probably only closed because it was 9 p.m. by that point, but still...!)

Image

Anyway to get this off of my personal stuff, I was thinking that there is a lot of scope for a sequel here. Mostly dealing with Async more fully rather than it being pushed to the sidelines. I know that Parsons has talked about not abandoning the YouTube side of the series as well, so it could appear there, but there are a few interesting dangling threads that could work into another feature for sure:
Spoiler
Mary's fate of course, although I love where the film leaves her. And maybe this is the equivalent of explaining the lore of the various monsters haunting the corridors of the Complex now. Who knows what other people's encounters with Mary will be like from this point on. Similarly Kat and Bobby: we sort of know Bobby's fate from the film, but even in the brief time he was there, he was already being 'remembered' in the moment of finding his "End Apartheid" white shirt on the ominous pile of all the other clothing in that basement room. But Kat ran off and entirely disappeared from the film, so what was her fate? Did she encounter Captain Clark too? Did she get out or was captured by Async? Is she like the other characters in the "Found Footage" videos and just forever trapped wandering the halls and eventually succumbing to the atmosphere? I could see Kat potentially becoming a big part of future developments, when she can just reappear again out of nowhere as a still living human, or something else. And what were her specific issues that the Backrooms will take on?

I am looking forward to getting to see this again at home because in addition to not catching the date of the opening Async video to see where that fits into the timeline, I want to also take a closer still frame look at the bag that Clark finds with all of the Async IDs and computer discs in it, to see what that may be referencing. That just breezes by in the film but might be planting the seeds for future developments.
So, I guess this means that I will be going to the cinema for the next Backrooms film at least!

(I still have not seen Iron Lung as yet, and am holding out for the deluxe Arrow Video release of that one! ;) )
Post Reply