Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

News on Criterion and Janus Films
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
Lowry_Sam
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2010 7:35 pm
Location: San Francisco, CA

Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#7151 Post by Lowry_Sam »

therewillbeblus wrote: Tue Aug 05, 2025 10:27 pm I could see them pairing Lolita and Eyes Wide Shut as two sensually-themed Kubricks in the same month, but as individual releases
I would think that Lolita is closer to being ready for an individual release than Eyes Wide Shut, but maybe they've been working on the restored version for a while and we'll get more than the theatrical release restored. But I also doubt that there's much impetus to release a box after you've released all the individual titles. Kino's The Killing & Paths Of Glory are now oop, so I wouldn't be surprised if Criterion is waiting on a box for the upgrades. Spartacus & 2001 for a complete box & can it all be ready for this Xmas? That seems like a Herculean task.
Last edited by Lowry_Sam on Wed Aug 06, 2025 4:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
crimlaw
Joined: Thu May 23, 2019 10:06 pm

Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#7152 Post by crimlaw »

Very disappointed to see that the long-rumored Catch 22 4K will be released by Shout in October rather than Criterion. Not many Paramount titles are left from the 60’s, 70’s and early 80’s that are Criterion worthy, except for Hud and, possibly Little Big Man; 1900; and Atlantic City.
User avatar
andyli
Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2009 8:46 pm

Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#7153 Post by andyli »

A New Leaf is the bigger disappointment. Criterion is surely compensating us with a super-duper edition of Breakfast at Tiffany’s and another very necessary edition of My Fair Lady, though.
User avatar
Matt
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 4:58 pm

Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#7154 Post by Matt »

Visit our newly revived Eclipse Discussion and Random Speculation thread, dormant since 2008!
User avatar
dwk
Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2010 10:10 pm

Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#7155 Post by dwk »

Kino Insider pretty much confirmed that Criterion has the both the original and remake of Cape Fear
Some label picked up both Cape Fear movies, we tried. Since it's been 5 years or so, you can probably guess who.
User avatar
Mr.DarjeelingLimited
Joined: Wed Dec 13, 2023 6:58 pm

Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#7156 Post by Mr.DarjeelingLimited »

dwk wrote: Fri Aug 08, 2025 4:21 pm Kino Insider pretty much confirmed that Criterion has the both the original and remake of Cape Fear
Some label picked up both Cape Fear movies, we tried. Since it's been 5 years or so, you can probably guess who.
Dope! I’m in the weird group of people who like Scorsese’s better than the original, so great news!
User avatar
bainbridgezu
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 2:54 am

Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#7157 Post by bainbridgezu »

Mr.DarjeelingLimited wrote: Fri Aug 08, 2025 5:38 pm
dwk wrote: Fri Aug 08, 2025 4:21 pm Kino Insider pretty much confirmed that Criterion has the both the original and remake of Cape Fear
Some label picked up both Cape Fear movies, we tried. Since it's been 5 years or so, you can probably guess who.
Dope! I’m in the weird group of people who like Scorsese’s better than the original, so great news!
There are dozens of us. Dozens!
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#7158 Post by domino harvey »

He does what Hollywood should do more often: if they must remake something, remake a film that wasn’t that great to begin with. And it gave us one of the best Simpsons episodes
jt938
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2024 4:06 pm

Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#7159 Post by jt938 »

Count me in as someone who prefers the remake as well. I've always thought that it was the majority opinion though.
User avatar
therewillbeblus
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2015 7:40 pm

Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#7160 Post by therewillbeblus »

Yeah neither are that highly regarded anyways, not sure how "weird" any opinion on this is
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#7161 Post by domino harvey »

Shame Shout won’t be releasing it with a commemorative Ring Pop
jt938
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2024 4:06 pm

Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#7162 Post by jt938 »

domino harvey wrote: Fri Aug 08, 2025 6:21 pm Shame Shout won’t be releasing it with a commemorative Ring Pop

I need my Max Cady enamel pins.
User avatar
FrauBlucher
Joined: Tue Jul 16, 2013 12:28 am
Location: Greenwich Village

Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#7163 Post by FrauBlucher »

Perhaps this gets released as a two in one as The Killers was
User avatar
DeprongMori
Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2014 5:59 am
Location: San Francisco

Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#7164 Post by DeprongMori »

domino harvey wrote: Fri Aug 08, 2025 6:14 pm He does what Hollywood should do more often: if they must remake something, remake a film that wasn’t that great to begin with. And it gave us one of the best Simpsons episodes
And the Simpsons episode inspired Mr. Burns - A Post-Electric Play, a theatrical adaptation set after an unspecified apocalypse
Zot!
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 4:09 am

Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#7165 Post by Zot! »

jt938 wrote: Fri Aug 08, 2025 6:18 pm Count me in as someone who prefers the remake as well. I've always thought that it was the majority opinion though.
Ditto, Scorsese got the mix of kitsch and horror right on this one, and everybody is pretty good at hamming it all the way up. It’s a great bit of proto-Tarantino nuttiness. The original is dull in comparison, even with a great effort from Mitchum.
This always made me crack up
User avatar
yoloswegmaster
Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2016 7:57 pm

Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#7166 Post by yoloswegmaster »

dwk wrote: Fri Aug 08, 2025 4:21 pm Kino Insider pretty much confirmed that Criterion has the both the original and remake of Cape Fear
Some label picked up both Cape Fear movies, we tried. Since it's been 5 years or so, you can probably guess who.
It's funny cause the Insider confirmed this back in 2021. Thank god for the Eclipse line coming back since it hopefully means that the backlog for titles like these shortens much faster.
User avatar
dwk
Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2010 10:10 pm

Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#7167 Post by dwk »

yoloswegmaster wrote: Fri Aug 08, 2025 7:16 pm It's funny cause the Insider confirmed this back in 2021. Thank god for the Eclipse line coming back since it hopefully means that the backlog for titles like these shortens much faster.
I remember them saying someone else had licensed them and both Arrow and Shout said they didn't have them.

I suspect that the holdup on these is getting Scorsese involved in the special features/transfer approval.
crimlaw
Joined: Thu May 23, 2019 10:06 pm

Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#7168 Post by crimlaw »

I can’t see an Eclipse set that includes the original Cape Fear, unless a J. Lee Thompson box set is in the making: Taras Bulba; Kings of the Sun; Mackenna’s Gold.

All guilty pleasures.
User avatar
ryannichols7
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2012 6:26 pm

Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#7169 Post by ryannichols7 »

andyli wrote: Thu Aug 07, 2025 3:26 am A New Leaf is the bigger disappointment. Criterion is surely compensating us with a super-duper edition of Breakfast at Tiffany’s and another very necessary edition of My Fair Lady, though.
A New Leaf was the most disappointed I'd been in awhile to hear that Criterion hadn't gotten a title. easily my favorite of May's films and given their focus on female directed films, I figured it was a former Olive title that they'd actually really pursue. cause I'm still broadly assuming they're gonna put out (yet another edition of) Johnny Guitar and Letter From an Unknown Woman from the former Olive batch
crimlaw wrote: Tue Aug 05, 2025 11:30 am The Criterion Saul Bass cover for Spartacus is still the best. You can’t find an original silk screen version of that poster anywhere. I know. I’ve looked since I collect original Saul Bass posters.
yep. the Bass cover + the commentary (one of the all time best) is why I would like a Criterion upgrade of Spartacus, even if Universal's edition is totally fine
DimitriL wrote: Tue Aug 05, 2025 5:16 pm
ryannichols7 wrote: Tue Aug 05, 2025 2:02 am just like they did Amadeus

(nah, I do think they'll actually do Eyes Wide Shut)
TBF, things often change pretty dramatically. It seems pretty clear at some point that Criterion had both Sixteen Candles and Ferris Bueller - there was a shot at Criterion HQ where a grade of Sixteen Candles was visible on a monitor, and I John Kapelos talked about Criterion reaching out to him regarding his deleted scene in FB - so it's certainly possible they had Amadeus for awhile and WB decided to go its own way.
that is true (and fitting you used that example cause I just went through the excellent disc of The Breakfast Club last week), and Forman definitely has his place at Criterion. I definitely also believed we'd see Amadeus at Criterion....but I just still really question Bill Hunt. at least he's not as bad as Dawn of the Discs
crimlaw
Joined: Thu May 23, 2019 10:06 pm

Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#7170 Post by crimlaw »

A New Leaf ranks as one of the biggest missteps ever for Criterion. It’s unclear whether they tried and were not able to secure the rights or just passed on it, which would be totally nonsensical given May’s ranking as one of the great female directors ever and her first film’s achievement in landing on the National Film Registry. I guess we’ll never know.
User avatar
CSM126
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 12:22 pm
Location: The Room
Contact:

Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#7171 Post by CSM126 »

They’re just waiting for Warren Beatty to slip the mortal coil so they can license Ishtar…and sit on it for twelve years before releasing it with one 15 minute interview they culled from an episode of Dick Cavett.
crimlaw
Joined: Thu May 23, 2019 10:06 pm

Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#7172 Post by crimlaw »

Meanwhile, Elaine May’s The Heartbreak Kid languishes in Bristol Myer Squibb purgatory, along with Sleuth, never to be seen or heard from again.
User avatar
ryannichols7
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2012 6:26 pm

Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#7173 Post by ryannichols7 »

crimlaw wrote: Sat Aug 09, 2025 12:25 am A New Leaf ranks as one of the biggest missteps ever for Criterion. It’s unclear whether they tried and were not able to secure the rights or just passed on it, which would be totally nonsensical given May’s ranking as one of the great female directors ever and her first film’s achievement in landing on the National Film Registry. I guess we’ll never know.
I find it incredibly hard to believe they wouldn't be able to secure the rights, or were outbid. this really feels like them letting it by. some equal blame should go to Kino - Frank Tarzi headed both Olive editions of A New Leaf, he should've known it'd be one to keep in print

scalding hot take: I didn't care for The Heartbreak Kid, but that also doesn't mean it shouldn't have a nice edition
User avatar
Peacock
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2008 11:47 pm
Location: Scotland

Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#7174 Post by Peacock »

I’m not sure why you would rather Kino released this over Cinématographe. The latter are doing great work with all their editions so far in my opinion. The film couldn’t have gone to a better home on the US market anyway.
User avatar
Lowry_Sam
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2010 7:35 pm
Location: San Francisco, CA

Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#7175 Post by Lowry_Sam »

I initially posted this in the Kino OOP thread because I hadn't noticed the original post was actually from 2022 (it had very few subsequent posts until one for today & just didn't notice the time gap):
swo17 wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 7:27 pm I don't see Microcosmos as part of that sale. Are we sure it's going OOP?
I didn't realize this finally got a US release. I gave up over a decade ago and bought the French bluray. You might want to hold off though, maybe Criterion will release a UHD as the version that plays on the Criterion Channel (English narration by Kirstin Scott Thomas) opens with a crazy C & Pathe ID but no Kino Lorber credit.

Addendum: If we get a box of Microcosmos, Genesis, & The Field Of Enchantment, hopefully it's not relegated to Eclipse.

yoloswegmaster wrote: Fri Aug 08, 2025 7:16 pm It's funny cause the Insider confirmed this back in 2021. Thank god for the Eclipse line coming back since it hopefully means that the backlog for titles like these shortens much faster.
I was actually going to guess for November that Criterion was going to bring back dual editions for the month after getting out my October/Halloween guesses:

The Killers upgrade
The Lower Depths upgrade
Imitation Of Life
Solaris
Gaslight
Lolita
Black Lizard (Kurotage)
Ripley box: The Talented Mr. Ripley (1956), Plein Soleil, The American Friend, The Talented Mr. Ripley, Ripley's Game, Ripley (2024 TV series) + Patricia Highsmith docs
Les Miserables box (1925, 1934, 1935, 1952, 1958, 1978, 1982 & 1998)

I guess I'll have to add Cape Fear to my list as it wasn't on my radar (and I wasn't such a fan of the original).
Post Reply