I like how the 4K restoration is planned for 2008, and the Criterion release for 2009, so they will presumably have enough time to gather all of your proposed extras--at least you are being realistic!
I enjoyed this subforum when it was an individual's honest attempt to artistically capture the essence of a film, boiled down to a cover. Now... bleh.
edit: obviously there are still some people making excellent covers on here, but filtering out all of the "jokes" is getting to be more and more tedius.
Maybe we should have a "serious" fake cover subforum and a "joke" fake cover subforum, and then maybe have each subforum further divided up by the decade of the film the cover was made for.
I know that Ambersons cover is supposed to be a joke, but someone should still be shot for having made it.
cgray wrote:I enjoyed this subforum when it was an individual's honest attempt to artistically capture the essence of a film, boiled down to a cover. Now... bleh.
Perhaps there should be separate subforums for "honest attempts at cover art" vs. "cover art that Criterion would never, ever put out, get it, wink wink"?
EDIT: I see Matt beat me to the punch, though I think he's being facetious.
cgray wrote:I enjoyed this subforum when it was an individual's honest attempt to artistically capture the essence of a film, boiled down to a cover. Now... bleh.
Yes. There is some beautiful artwork in this thread, and I get very excited when I see it bumped. The jokes are fine, but they should have their own thread.
I just don't know where something like "The Hottie and the Nottie" would go. It looks great and real which IMO makes it belong in the serious thread, but obviously it is a joke. Quite the dilemma.
domino harvey wrote:No offense to those of you who I am sure are nice people, but there has never been a good fantasy Criterion cover posted on this board.