Columbia Classics
- Gregory
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 8:07 pm
Re: Columbia Classics
I can't believe they missed their chance with this Kim Novak set to bring Strangers When We Meet back in print. I wonder if they would ever license it to Criterion (if Criterion would ever be interested)?
-
zq333zq
- Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 5:44 pm
Re: Columbia Classics
Yup, it sure seems like a wasted opportunity.Gregory wrote:I can't believe they missed their chance with this Kim Novak set to bring Strangers When We Meet back in print. I wonder if they would ever license it to Criterion (if Criterion would ever be interested)?
- domino harvey
- Dot Com Dom
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm
Re: Columbia Classics
Several of their Richard Quine titles went OOP... I wonder if Sony'd ever consider him high-profile enough for a director's set?Gregory wrote:I can't believe they missed their chance with this Kim Novak set to bring Strangers When We Meet back in print. I wonder if they would ever license it to Criterion (if Criterion would ever be interested)?
- Jean-Luc Garbo
- Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 5:55 am
- Contact:
Re: Columbia Classics
Sorry to go OT, Matt, but how was the Darling doc?Matt wrote:I just saw the new documentary on Candy Darling and learned that if it weren't for Kim Novak, there probably would not have been a Candy Darling (at least not the particular iteration we got), so she gets a pass from me.
- Matt
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 4:58 pm
Re: Columbia Classics
It was okay. Totally lacking in narrative focus, but full of interesting vintage footage and audio recordings. Worth watching when it eventually runs on the Sundance Channel or gets released on DVD.
-
jaredsap
- Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 5:24 am
- Location: Los Angeles
Re: Columbia Classics
To my eternal chagrin, we've lost the rights to STRANGERS WHEN WE MEET. I mentioned to Criterion. Would be a great, great title for them in my opinion.zq333zq wrote:Yup, it sure seems like a wasted opportunity.Gregory wrote:I can't believe they missed their chance with this Kim Novak set to bring Strangers When We Meet back in print. I wonder if they would ever license it to Criterion (if Criterion would ever be interested)?
- domino harvey
- Dot Com Dom
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm
Re: Columbia Classics
Did a lot of Quine films expire because the rights holders are shopping them around? Paramount's Suzie Wong and Sony's Solid Gold Cadillac also just went out of print. These are low, low profile films, I can't imagine that whoever owns them thinks they can find a better deal out there in this market, but it seems like more than a coincidence
-
jaredsap
- Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 5:24 am
- Location: Los Angeles
Re: Columbia Classics
SOLID GOLD CADILLAC has actually been OOP for awhile, but Sony still has all rights.domino harvey wrote:Did a lot of Quine films expire because the rights holders are shopping them around? Paramount's Suzie Wong and Sony's Solid Gold Cadillac also just went out of print. These are low, low profile films, I can't imagine that whoever owns them thinks they can find a better deal out there in this market, but it seems like more than a coincidence
- HistoryProf
- Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 7:48 am
- Location: KCK
Re: Columbia Classics
i've not seen the film, but that post made me want to more than just about any other i've seen on any blog. If the film is half as evocative as that piece, then it sounds fascinating.zq333zq wrote:Yup, it sure seems like a wasted opportunity.Gregory wrote:I can't believe they missed their chance with this Kim Novak set to bring Strangers When We Meet back in print. I wonder if they would ever license it to Criterion (if Criterion would ever be interested)?
- Jean-Luc Garbo
- Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 5:55 am
- Contact:
Re: Columbia Classics
Thanks. I'll certainly track it down now. Was Peter Hujar interviewed?Matt wrote:It was okay. Totally lacking in narrative focus, but full of interesting vintage footage and audio recordings. Worth watching when it eventually runs on the Sundance Channel or gets released on DVD.
- Matt
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 4:58 pm
Re: Columbia Classics
No, but Fran Lebowitz and Jayne County are, with hilarious results.Jean-Luc Garbo wrote:Was Peter Hujar interviewed?
- Der Spieler
- Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 3:05 pm
Re: Columbia Classics
Beaver's review of 'Human Desire' from the upcoming Noir vol. 2 box is not so hot.
- Cash Flagg
- Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 3:15 am
Re: Columbia Classics
Beaver's review of the entire set
-
TIVOLI
- Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2007 9:58 pm
Re: Columbia Classics
Given the disappointing news about Human Desire -- after such a long wait -- has anybody seen the Spanish release? Is it from the same source as the Japanese DVD?
- Ashirg
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:10 pm
- Location: Atlanta
Re: Columbia Classics
There were two different Human Desire releases in Spain - from Suevia Films and from Columbia/Sony as part of "New Columbia Classics" line. Which one do you have?
-
jojo
- Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2008 5:47 pm
Re: Columbia Classics
Good lord those are some really crappy subtitles.
- Der Spieler
- Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 3:05 pm
Re: Columbia Classics
Indeed.
Very botched job on the subs from Sony...
Very botched job on the subs from Sony...
-
marnum
- Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2010 4:50 pm
Experiment in Terror
Is the R2 release for Experiment in Terror a Moviemail exclusive? I can't find it anywhere else. The £11.99 price + shipping is a bit high for me.
-
Frank M
- Joined: Sun Apr 30, 2006 8:24 am
- Location: Germany
Re: Experiment in Terror
There's a German release from Sony available at Amazon.demarnum wrote:Is the R2 release for Experiment in Terror a Moviemail exclusive? I can't find it anywhere else. The £11.99 price + shipping is a bit high for me.
- HistoryProf
- Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 7:48 am
- Location: KCK
Re: Columbia Classics
no kidding...not only the awful gold but putting them in gray boxes? wtf were they thinking?jojo wrote:Good lord those are some really crappy subtitles.
- Ovader
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 5:56 am
- Location: Canada
Re: Columbia Classics
This was brought to my attention by Eddie Muller regarding Simon Abrams' inability to distinguish Kim Novak from Deborah Kerr when the "critic" has the film, the packaging, and IMDb right in front of him...
- domino harvey
- Dot Com Dom
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm
Re: Columbia Classics
Everything about the Pushover section is a joke-- what person even semiliterate in film in his right mind wouldn't invoke Double Indemnity before Flubber in connection to this film? And Ms Kerr had only been working at least ten years prior to Novak, an actress she in no way shape or form resembles. And such a mistake also betrays ignorance of one of the classic Sternberg/Deitrich relationships in Hollywood, of Quine/Novak, which of course started here. This is why no one takes the internet seriously
- perkizitore
- Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2008 7:29 pm
- Location: OOP is the only answer
Re: Columbia Classics
They wanted to recreate a VHS feeling for the fanboys who owned them back in the days...HistoryProf wrote:no kidding...not only the awful gold but putting them in gray boxes? wtf were they thinking?jojo wrote:Good lord those are some really crappy subtitles.
-
Jonathan S
- Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2008 7:31 am
- Location: Somerset, England
Re: Columbia Classics
The confusion probably arose because each starred in a famous movie with a climax involving a nun ringing a bell and a fall from a high place. I'm always confusing Kathleen Byron and Jimmy Stewart.Ovader wrote:This was brought to my attention by Eddie Muller regarding Simon Abrams' inability to distinguish Kim Novak from Deborah Kerr when the "critic" has the film, the packaging, and IMDb right in front of him...
- Finch
- Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 9:09 pm
- Location: United States
Re: Columbia Classics
A Spanish website alleges that Sony have announced a Blu-Ray of Bridge on the River Kwai for fourth quarter 2010 release
http://translate.google.com/translate?h ... id%3D27317" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://translate.google.com/translate?h ... id%3D27317" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;