Criterion on Social Media

News on Criterion and Janus Films
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
knives
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 10:49 pm

Re: Criterion Facebook and Twitter

#2151 Post by knives »

Either Mr. Jealousy or Highball is disowned by him which is going a lot further than we're describing here.
User avatar
Jeff
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:49 am
Location: Denver, CO

Re: Criterion Facebook and Twitter

#2152 Post by Jeff »

knives wrote:Either Mr. Jealousy or Highball is disowned by him which is going a lot further than we're describing here.
Highball is a lot easier to turn your back on than Margot at the Wedding! He disowned Highball because it was a (failed) experiment which he shot in a week, and it was released against his will. Very different situation.
chrisandy
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2008 4:37 am

Re: Criterion Facebook and Twitter

#2153 Post by chrisandy »

Image

Edit: I'm hearing PICNIC AT HANGING ROCK on Facebook. Seems legit. This was due for a re-release for a while now..
User avatar
bainbridgezu
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 2:54 am

Re: Criterion Facebook and Twitter

#2154 Post by bainbridgezu »

Heaven's Gate? Picnic at Hanging Rock?
User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:25 pm
Location: SLC, UT

Re: Criterion Facebook and Twitter

#2155 Post by swo17 »

If it's one of those two, presumably someone has an old DVD and can check? Surely there are more than just two movies that include a scene where someone wears a dress on some grass.

EDIT: It's Rosetta! Someone on Facebook found the image here (scroll to #66).
User avatar
Harmonov
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2008 3:26 pm
Location: Bloomington, IN

Re: Criterion Facebook and Twitter

#2156 Post by Harmonov »

bainbridgezu wrote:Heaven's Gate? Picnic at Hanging Rock?
I'd be willing to bet on Picnic at Hanging Rock. Just saw this on the big screen and it was my first impulse.
User avatar
matrixschmatrix
Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 3:26 am

Re: Criterion Facebook and Twitter

#2157 Post by matrixschmatrix »

Google image search guesses the Dardennes' Rosetta, which seems plausible.
User avatar
mfunk9786
Under Chris' Protection
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 8:43 pm
Location: Miami, FL

Re: Criterion Facebook and Twitter

#2158 Post by mfunk9786 »

Wow, a Dardennes box, I wonder?
chrisandy
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2008 4:37 am

Re: Criterion Facebook and Twitter

#2159 Post by chrisandy »

swo17 wrote:If it's one of those two, presumably someone has an old DVD and can check? Surely there are more than just two movies that include a scene where someone wears a dress on some grass.

EDIT: It's Rosetta! Someone on Facebook found the image here (scroll to #66).
Good catch. Some are speculating box set along with La Promesse. Maybe Le fils too?
User avatar
Jeff
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:49 am
Location: Denver, CO

Re: Criterion Facebook and Twitter

#2160 Post by Jeff »

I don't think it's a box. Just paired sequential spines of La promesse and Rosetta.

Perhaps the Wenders box will be ready for August though.
User avatar
jwd5275
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 4:26 pm
Location: SF, CA

Re: Criterion Facebook and Twitter

#2161 Post by jwd5275 »

chrisandy wrote: Maybe Le fils too?
God, in my opinion one of the greatest films ever made, but I think unlikely being that I believe New Yorker retained the rights.
Last edited by jwd5275 on Wed May 02, 2012 7:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Harmonov
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2008 3:26 pm
Location: Bloomington, IN

Re: Criterion Facebook and Twitter

#2162 Post by Harmonov »

chrisandy wrote:
swo17 wrote:If it's one of those two, presumably someone has an old DVD and can check? Surely there are more than just two movies that include a scene where someone wears a dress on some grass.

EDIT: It's Rosetta! Someone on Facebook found the image here (scroll to #66).
Good catch. Some are speculating box set along with La Promesse. Maybe Le fils too?
Can't believe I was so far off. Sigh.

(hangs head in shame)
Zot!
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 4:09 am

Re: Criterion Facebook and Twitter

#2163 Post by Zot! »

WOOT! This made my day. I'd buy a box, but really only desperately want Rosetta.

That scene with the drum rehearsal tape is high comedy.

Now, how about those Dumont movies....
User avatar
zedz
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 11:24 pm

Re: Criterion Facebook and Twitter

#2164 Post by zedz »

I hope they find some room on any Dardennes disc they release for some of their early shorts / documentaries / features, since their pre-Promesse career is terra incognita for me.
User avatar
Peacock
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2008 11:47 pm
Location: Scotland

Re: Criterion Facebook and Twitter

#2165 Post by Peacock »

I was under the impression they had disowned, or at least, weren't fond of any of their pre-Promesse films... although they are meant to be deal with similar subject matter so maybe Criterion could throw in a related early doc?
chrisandy
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2008 4:37 am

Re: Criterion Facebook and Twitter

#2166 Post by chrisandy »

jwd5275 wrote:
chrisandy wrote: Maybe Le fils too?
God, in my opinion one of the greatest films ever made, but I think unlikely being that I believe New Yorker retained the rights.
I was under the impression that they also owned the rights to A MAN ESCAPED which CC plans on releasing, so who knows..? But you're probably right, it'll likely just be ROSETTA and maybe LA PROMESSE.

:-k
User avatar
jwd5275
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 4:26 pm
Location: SF, CA

Re: Criterion Facebook and Twitter

#2167 Post by jwd5275 »

I am not completely sure of the inside details (anyone who has better knowledge than me please correct me if I am wrong), but I believe that at some point the rights for a group of New Yorker films were transferred to Janus. I am not sure if this was before New Yorker "went out of business" or during the proceedings, however the films transferred included the some Bressons, Weekend, Promesse and maybe some others, which do not show up on the website for the "new" company. For some reason Janus could not or did not want to pick up the titles on showing on the new New Yorker website like le Fils or Celine and Julie go Boating (which is supposed to be forthcoming...)
User avatar
warren oates
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2012 4:16 pm

Re: Criterion Facebook and Twitter

#2168 Post by warren oates »

Rosetta is all right but The Son is truly their masterpiece, a film that definitely deserves to be on Blu-ray with a array of worthy supplements.
User avatar
Saturnome
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 9:22 pm

Re: Criterion Facebook and Twitter

#2169 Post by Saturnome »

The only Dardenne I have seen is The Son, but it's pretty amazing indeed and I would buy the Blu-Ray in a second.
User avatar
Jeff
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:49 am
Location: Denver, CO

Re: Criterion Facebook and Twitter

#2170 Post by Jeff »

jwd5275 wrote:I believe that at some point the rights for a group of New Yorker films were transferred to Janus... the films transferred included the some Bressons, Weekend, Promesse and maybe some others
I think it's just that the rights expired, New Yorker wasn't in a financial position to renew them, and they reverted to their foreign rights holders. Janus subsequently licensed them as they became available. Their contracts for the films they've still got were newer, so the rights didn't expire during the time New Yorker was in limbo. I'm sure that new New Yorker is now trying to renew as many licenses as they can.
ianungstad
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 1:20 am

Re: Criterion Facebook and Twitter

#2171 Post by ianungstad »

cdnchris wrote:Cinematographer Harris Savides visits the closet.

I'm guessing The Game. Zodiac would be cool, too.
I shot David Prior a PM on the Home Theater Forum. He said that Criterion are not releasing Zodiac and he's equally as frustrated about Paramount letting the title go out of print. He thinks it's too big of a title for Paramount to license out and that he thinks they'll reissue the disc eventually. As for the extras that didn't make the previous release. He said it wasn't another disc full of extras but only a few small pieces that would have made Paramount go to a third disc and they declined because it would have been cost prohibitive to release a third disc for only a small amount of content.
User avatar
FilmFanSea
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 5:37 pm
Location: Portland, OR

Re: Criterion Facebook and Twitter

#2172 Post by FilmFanSea »

jwd5275 wrote:
chrisandy wrote: Maybe Le fils too?
God, in my opinion one of the greatest films ever made, but I think unlikely being that I believe New Yorker retained the rights.
Seconded. I've yet to see a film of the Dardennes brothers I didn't like, but Le Fils/The Son is the first among equals.
User avatar
flyonthewall2983
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 7:31 pm
Location: Indiana
Contact:

Re: Criterion Facebook and Twitter

#2173 Post by flyonthewall2983 »

ianungstad wrote:
cdnchris wrote:Cinematographer Harris Savides visits the closet.

I'm guessing The Game. Zodiac would be cool, too.
I shot David Prior a PM on the Home Theater Forum. He said that Criterion are not releasing Zodiac and he's equally as frustrated about Paramount letting the title go out of print. He thinks it's too big of a title for Paramount to license out and that he thinks they'll reissue the disc eventually. As for the extras that didn't make the previous release. He said it wasn't another disc full of extras but only a few small pieces that would have made Paramount go to a third disc and they declined because it would have been cost prohibitive to release a third disc for only a small amount of content.
I'm not surprised it's just a few things and not an entire disc of stuff, the 2-disc edition is quite exhaustive as is. What I'm wondering is is if those pieces would fit onto a reissue, because Blu-ray discs are possibly more advanced than in 2008?
duck duck
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 3:45 am

Re: Criterion Facebook and Twitter

#2174 Post by duck duck »

I call "Bullshit" on Robert Downey and P.T. Anderson web exclusive... How is this not a feature on something? Obviously the two have something to talk about or else they wouldn't be making it a web series.
User avatar
eerik
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2009 8:53 pm
Location: Estonia

Re: Criterion Facebook and Twitter

#2175 Post by eerik »

flyonthewall2983 wrote:I'm not surprised it's just a few things and not an entire disc of stuff, the 2-disc edition is quite exhaustive as is. What I'm wondering is is if those pieces would fit onto a reissue, because Blu-ray discs are possibly more advanced than in 2008?
Technology is still pretty much the same, but they used single layer disc for the special features which could now be easily upgraded to a dual layer disc.
Post Reply