The Criterion hint is CLEARLY a reference to the Clint Howard classic "The Ice Cream Man!"
Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)
-
Brianruns10
- Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 2:48 pm
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)
People, people you've got it all wrong.
The Criterion hint is CLEARLY a reference to the Clint Howard classic "The Ice Cream Man!"
The Criterion hint is CLEARLY a reference to the Clint Howard classic "The Ice Cream Man!"
- tajmahal
- Joined: Tue May 12, 2009 3:10 am
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)
The first thought that comes to mind is just desserts.antnield wrote:Sunday Bloody Sunday
any help?
- eerik
- Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2009 8:53 pm
- Location: Estonia
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)
Sundae, just like the filename says.tajmahal wrote:The first thought that comes to mind is just desserts.antnield wrote:Sunday Bloody Sunday
any help?
- rossen
- Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2009 7:23 pm
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)
Cesar Aira How I Became a Nun?
-
britcom68
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)
Face in the Crowd came out the same year as Sweet Smell of Success too; one is prescient of radio/television, the other of print. Yet why is it that Face in the Crowd has so rarely been mentioned alongside Sweet Smell of Success?Professor Wagstaff wrote:And Will Rogers.Jeff wrote:Likely modeled on Arthur Godfrey.knives wrote:Was there anybody like that back then though. It seems really prescient now, but perhaps there was an equivalent at the time.
-
britcom68
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)
It would be tremendous if Criterion got back Darling considering they released it on Laserdisc as with Sunday Bloody Sunday. This year has already seen some multipple offerings by the same director in the same month (theSpaldings, Promesse/Rosetta, the Frejos). Although the MGM dvd of Darling is still current, after Criterion releasing 12 Angry Men when the non-Criterion special edition of it was still technically in-stock I've given up trying to guess at what really is available for Criterion to relase and when to release it. Odds are though that Darling will not make it back to Criterion for the foreseeable future due to the complex rights it faces now.atcolomb wrote:Still have the Criterion laserdisc of the movie which was released many years ago and then coppied the broadcast version when it played on the MGM-HD channel a few months ago and it looked very nice and a good movie too.
Regardless though, the one special feature for a Criterion Sunday Bloody Sunday release I hope gets addressed is the appearance of Daniel Day Lewis as a hoodlum. It would be interesting to hear what, if anything, he learned from working on this film and with Finch and Schlesinger in particular.
- gcgiles1dollarbin
- Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2010 7:38 am
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)
For me, at least, Face in the Crowd rankles because of the self-righteous, patently voice-of-reason, old-school-liberal characterization of Walter Matthau's Mel Miller (unsuccessfully attempting, I think, a kind of Jack Burden from All the King's Men). There is nothing nearly that bald to correct the nihilism in Sweet Smell of Success, thank goodness. But, of course, this is far afield from the newsletter.britcom68 wrote:Face in the Crowd came out the same year as Sweet Smell of Success too; one is prescient of radio/television, the other of print. Yet why is it that Face in the Crowd has so rarely been mentioned alongside Sweet Smell of Success?
-
britcom68
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)
This is so true and yet, good conversations like these are only possible by reflecting what is in the newsletter versus what we wanted to be in the newsletter.gcgiles1dollarbin wrote:But, of course, this is far afield from the newsletter.
Now what did that bloody sunday clue represent?
- Lemmy Caution
- Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 7:26 am
- Location: East of Shanghai
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)
When they are trying to persuade Rhodes to go on television, Will Rogers is specifically referenced as an antecedent and an example of the kind of powerful folksy media player Lonesome Rhodes could become. Rhodes also improvises the ad copy and razzes his sponsors in much the way that Arthur Godfrey did.Professor Wagstaff wrote:And Will Rogers.Jeff wrote:Likely modeled on Arthur Godfrey.knives wrote:Was there anybody like that back then though. It seems really prescient now, but perhaps there was an equivalent at the time.
-
Perkins Cobb
- Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:49 pm
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)
Finally, a newsletter clue so obvious that even I got it!
- ryannichols7
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2012 6:26 pm
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)
of course they give us the clue to a movie we already know is coming.
i wasn't a fan of the film at all on first watch, but the extras should be among Criterion's best.
i wasn't a fan of the film at all on first watch, but the extras should be among Criterion's best.
-
ianungstad
- Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 1:20 am
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)
Alfonso Cuaron must be doing the top 10 list this month?
- swo17
- Bloodthirsty Butcher
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:25 pm
- Location: SLC, UT
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

Isn't this Heaven's Gate?
- Cold Bishop
- Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 1:45 am
- Location: Portland, OR
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)
EDIT: why are there no good .gifs of Walter White's "Crawl Space" laugh? Because that's how I feel right now.
Last edited by Cold Bishop on Tue Jul 31, 2012 10:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- eerik
- Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2009 8:53 pm
- Location: Estonia
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IiNlthlz1d8" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
- Tom Hagen
- Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2008 4:35 pm
- Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)
Can't wait for the extras on this.
- oldsheperd
- Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 9:18 pm
- Location: Rio Rancho/Albuquerque
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)
Well in that case. I'm interested to see this film. I guess it bankrupted a studio and is like a million hours long?
- knives
- Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 10:49 pm
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)
I guess you don't watch Tarkovsky movies either.
- Lowry_Sam
- Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2010 7:35 pm
- Location: San Francisco, CA
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)
Is this a clue for this year's big box set?
Re-evaluting the 1980s: Restoring & reassessing 1980s flops:
Heaven's Gate
Raise The Titanic
Ishtar
One From The Heart
Revolution
Popeye
Re-evaluting the 1980s: Restoring & reassessing 1980s flops:
Heaven's Gate
Raise The Titanic
Ishtar
One From The Heart
Revolution
Popeye
Last edited by Lowry_Sam on Wed Aug 01, 2012 1:25 am, edited 1 time in total.
- knives
- Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 10:49 pm
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)
Not likely. Not only have they shown that they produced some very long extras specific to Heaven's Gate, but that is a whole mess of different rights holders.
- warren oates
- Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2012 4:16 pm
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)
There's no rule of thumb for the "newsletter clue to how long it freakin' takes to come out in number of months later ratio," right? I can't wait to see this again on Blu-ray. Probably the release of the year for me, whatever year it comes out.
- knives
- Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 10:49 pm
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)
Unless a delay occurs it is usually three or four months from clue to a films official announcement. That means in all likelihood it will be either a December or January release assuming no delays.
- hearthesilence
- Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 8:22 am
- Location: NYC
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)
Excellent news. I remember hearing John Kirk talking about his work on this. The late Bingham Ray gave him the greenlight not long before he was pushed out of MGM/UA. When it was done, the studio did little to promote it and it barely got shown.
- jedgeco
- Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 3:28 pm
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)
Aren't we still waiting on "Wacky Drunk Dog" from last September?warren oates wrote:There's no rule of thumb for the "newsletter clue to how long it freakin' takes to come out in number of months later ratio," right?
