The Lists Project

An ongoing project to survey the best films of individual decades, genres, and filmmakers
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
zedz
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 11:24 pm

Re: The Lists Project

#1651 Post by zedz »

swo17 wrote:
zedz wrote:
swo17 wrote:The following are examples of multi-part films that may be voted for as a single film, or each segment as a separate film, if you insist (with all votes competing against each other): Heimat, Berlin Alexanderplatz, Dekalog, Shoah, Fanny and Alexander
This is such an incredibly foolish ruling that I can't believe it's actually a rule. Surely it hasn't come into play before, because there haven't been any miniseries with that kind of profile before the 80s list. To me, it's the equivalent of being able to vote for "the bit before the first intermission in Napoleon," or "the second mezzo of Otto e mezzo" - and since all of these films have screened theatrically, it's an exact equivalent.

Let's end this madness now!
We already discussed this issue before the '70s list, and you agreed with the revised rule language back then.
I don't think these examples of single films shot and screened as single works (whether they were serialized over a number of weeks on television or not) is at all comparable to separately released two-part theatrical films like Ivan the Terrible or Kill Bill and I certainly wouldn't have supported the rule change if I thought it would break up something like Fanny and Alexander into little chunks. It's no more a "multi-part film" than Satantango.
User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:25 pm
Location: SLC, UT

Re: The Lists Project

#1652 Post by swo17 »

I think we basically agree, and if it will ruffle less feathers, I can save the "you can vote for individual parts if you insist" line for those cases where I think people might legitimately want to vote that way.
User avatar
zedz
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 11:24 pm

Re: The Lists Project

#1653 Post by zedz »

I can just see this ending in the 2000s with people wanting to vote for their favourite episodes of their favourite series of Deadwood!

(Don't know why it was that particular series that sprang to mind!)
User avatar
matrixschmatrix
Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 3:26 am

Re: The Lists Project

#1654 Post by matrixschmatrix »

Now that the 70s project is wrapped up, I wanted to run off the genre list subject. The two i know will be on there are War and Religion- for other suggestions (I know Romance was one) I'll put them on if they get at least three people suggesting they'd like to have it as an option. I figure I'll give it Thursday evening before we move to the next step, unless someone objects.
User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:25 pm
Location: SLC, UT

Re: The Lists Project

#1655 Post by swo17 »

Why not just throw any reasonable suggestion up on the ballot, and then have it run like film club where people can change their vote at any time? No harm in having plenty of options.
User avatar
matrixschmatrix
Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 3:26 am

Re: The Lists Project

#1656 Post by matrixschmatrix »

Fair enough- I wanted to prevent too much vote splitting, but unless there are a huge number, I suppose that won't be an issue.
User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:25 pm
Location: SLC, UT

Re: The Lists Project

#1657 Post by swo17 »

Yeah, with the film club style vote, vote splitting is no longer an issue, as once two or three frontrunners eventually emerge, everyone who wants to can switch their vote to pick from among the "finalists."
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: The Lists Project

#1658 Post by domino harvey »

Man, actually, I disagree. Hasn't the film club actually shown us what happens when vote splitting occurs over three or four viable options? One choice barely wins and those who voted on it don't even bother to weight in. Any more than three options for this is ridiculous, in my opinion, and just guarantees something silly makes it
User avatar
zedz
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 11:24 pm

Re: The Lists Project

#1659 Post by zedz »

I'd even be happy with matrix simply declaring what the next genre will be, based on previous discussions. We've had plenty of votes in the past to show us where the forum's interests lie.
User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:25 pm
Location: SLC, UT

Re: The Lists Project

#1660 Post by swo17 »

Just so long as he prays about it first.
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: The Lists Project

#1661 Post by domino harvey »

zedz wrote:I'd even be happy with matrix simply declaring what the next genre will be, based on previous discussions. We've had plenty of votes in the past to show us where the forum's interests lie.
*cough* It was supposed to be War several lists ago already anyways *cough*
User avatar
Yojimbo
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 2:06 pm
Location: Ireland

Re: The Lists Project

#1662 Post by Yojimbo »

domino harvey wrote:
zedz wrote:I'd even be happy with matrix simply declaring what the next genre will be, based on previous discussions. We've had plenty of votes in the past to show us where the forum's interests lie.
*cough* It was supposed to be War several lists ago already anyways *cough*
Let's fight over it! :D
User avatar
matrixschmatrix
Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 3:26 am

Re: The Lists Project

#1663 Post by matrixschmatrix »

Well, hell, I'd be happy to do either War or Religion and I have zero interest in Romance, so from my end I'd be fine with a runoff just between those two.
User avatar
Yojimbo
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 2:06 pm
Location: Ireland

Re: The Lists Project

#1664 Post by Yojimbo »

matrixschmatrix wrote:Well, hell, I'd be happy to do either War or Religion and I have zero interest in Romance, so from my end I'd be fine with a runoff just between those two.
Once we decide which is next, then we'll move on to grapple with definitions.
Of course, Religion could encompass movies about 'religious wars'
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: The Lists Project

#1665 Post by domino harvey »

War encompasses so many great and interesting movies, thousands to choose from covering a wide range of options -- the Civil War, the Revolutionary War, propaganda flicks, Vietnam, Iraq (X2), homefront pieces, &c and &c. Religion might start some interesting discussions initially, but the ability to find thousands-- hell, to find hundreds of worthwhile films to draw from in order to pick a representative fifty for an individual list is highly dubious
Last edited by domino harvey on Wed Jan 29, 2014 4:15 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Yojimbo
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 2:06 pm
Location: Ireland

Re: The Lists Project

#1666 Post by Yojimbo »

domino harvey wrote:War encompasses so many great and interesting movies, thousands to choose from covering a wide range of options -- the Civil War, the Revolutionary War, propaganda flicks, Vietnam, Iraq (X2), homefront pieces, &c and &c. Religion might start some interesting discussions initially, but the ability to find thousands-- hell, to find hundreds of films to draw from in order to pick a representative fifty for an individual list is highly dubious
As moviegoing kids - and teenagers - War films for me were films set in WWI and WWII ; although, later, films set in the Korean War sneaked in; once we became aware of it.
(the original definition was also formed by the 58/64 page pocket comic-books we also devoured at the time)

Vietnam War films, of course, came later.

I'm not sure could I produce a 50 of great - or very good - films that fit those strict criteria; but I'd like to

Of course, extending the definition to encompass the two Gulf Wars; the war in Afghanistan, and assorted other 20th/21st Century 'conflicts' would help
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: The Lists Project

#1667 Post by domino harvey »

I think the wars people limit themselves to in and of itself will be interesting-- does a member restrict themselves to WWII? Or do they go in the opposite direction and stretch the definition to Taking Off for the culture war? It'd be fun to hear everyone's self-justification within the world of the Vote For it policy
User avatar
Yojimbo
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 2:06 pm
Location: Ireland

Re: The Lists Project

#1668 Post by Yojimbo »

domino harvey wrote:I think the wars people limit themselves to in and of itself will be interesting-- does a member restrict themselves to WWII? Or do they go in the opposite direction and stretch the definition to Taking Off for the culture war? It'd be fun to hear everyone's self-justification within the world of the Vote For it policy
I'll definitely try to restrict myself to 20th-21st Century; I mean, 'El Cid' - for example - belongs more in the category of 'Historical' or 'Epic'.

Taking Off would be really stretching it, though.
Although since everything seemed to evolve from the Vietnam War in the Oliver Stone-scripted 'Year of the Dragon', that might provide me with the necessary excuse to include it! :)
User avatar
matrixschmatrix
Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 3:26 am

Re: The Lists Project

#1669 Post by matrixschmatrix »

I don't know that I agree that finding a decent array of films with religion or religious themes as their subject, inspiration, or context would be especially difficult- though I think there might be an issue insofar as, outside of movies specifically about priests or gods or epiphanies or what have you, one wouldn't necessarily know something was a religious movie until one watched it. It's certainly one where recommendations and discussion would be extremely valuable, though.

As far as war movies go, for my part it would seem somewhat silly to broaden it to include anything that had a war as in the synonym for conflict- thinking of it in terms of culture wars, the war on drugs, the battle between the sexes and so forth seem as though it would make the idea of war as a genre meaningless, since it would then encompass an actual majority of movies. However, anything that was about an armed conflict between two governments or political organizations or nations or whatever seems like it would be pretty indisputably a War Movie- restricting it to a specific list of wars seems to me to be intentionally blinding oneself to some of the most interesting pockets in the category.

My major concern here is ensuring that, whatever we do next, it's something that a good number of people will be on board with, and which will sustain a list- so I'm not really that averse to just declaring it War by fiat, though Religion I think would interest me more. I just want to get people's buy in before doing so.
User avatar
Yojimbo
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 2:06 pm
Location: Ireland

Re: The Lists Project

#1670 Post by Yojimbo »

matrixschmatrix wrote: so I'm not really that averse to just declaring it War by fiat, though Religion I think would interest me more. I just want to get people's buy in before doing so.
For me, the War movie genre has produced some of the most poetic in all of cinema - I'm thinking of such as the Renoirs, 'The Burmese Harp', 'The Cranes Are Flying', Larisa Shepitko's 'Wings' - so I'm eagerly looking forward to members recommendations/lists in the hope/expectation that there's more gems that I've yet to discover.

And plus, I really believe that the outcome could prove to be the most admirable of all the lists produced here.
User avatar
Lemmy Caution
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 7:26 am
Location: East of Shanghai

Re: The Lists Project

#1671 Post by Lemmy Caution »

So Religion it is.
Okay, let's get started ....
User avatar
knives
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 10:49 pm

Re: The Lists Project

#1672 Post by knives »

I'm still for religion though I hope we go beyond a literal interpretation of it.
User avatar
Yojimbo
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 2:06 pm
Location: Ireland

Re: The Lists Project

#1673 Post by Yojimbo »

Lemmy Caution wrote:So Religion it is.
Okay, let's get started ....
OK, well, if that's what you've decided

....we'll fight over it! :D
bamwc2
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 3:54 pm

Re: The Lists Project

#1674 Post by bamwc2 »

knives wrote:I'm still for religion though I hope we go beyond a literal interpretation of it.
Knives! I thought that you were on board for my idea of sex/sexuality for your own research purposes. If there is a vote, can we still include it? If we want a general genre banner, we can always just say "erotica" though it's not a perfect fit for what I have in mind.
User avatar
knives
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 10:49 pm

Re: The Lists Project

#1675 Post by knives »

I've actually been doing some prep on the religion because I thought we already decided, but I'm cool with erotics too.
Post Reply