Criterion Newsletter (Part 3)
-
beastwave
- Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2014 10:07 pm
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 3)
I just find it interesting that Cassavetes is trending so hard right now. With the box set being reissued recently, and some of his films being screened here in Los Angeles, but whatever. Love Streams is a great film, and its cool that its being added to the collection. I would be curious to see what special features it has, and what the box art will look like.
I suppose this newest Newsletter drawing is an "obvious" clue to some, but then again sometimes those so-called "obvious" clues mean nothing. The last newsletter clue was the toy scuba diver, and some people initially thought it was Steve Zissou, then it became widely agreed it would be Tie Me Up Tie Me Down. Then the next batch of announcements what do we get ? Steve Zissou. So until its in print, it could be anything.
Not to mention those clues that support a film that never comes to fruition. Eraserhead anyone?
Since Criterion runs a business that makes money and has many fans willing to spend their money, there will always be those who will prefer certain releases than others. What is annoying is when others get bent out of shape because individuals are merely voicing their opinion. It would be amazing to see any of Lynch's films enter the Collection in Blu Ray format. I respect those with "blinders" who want to see their films released. Its nice to see passion and a little bit of hope.
Cheers to all the Cassavetes fans out there if indeed Love Streams is coming.
I suppose this newest Newsletter drawing is an "obvious" clue to some, but then again sometimes those so-called "obvious" clues mean nothing. The last newsletter clue was the toy scuba diver, and some people initially thought it was Steve Zissou, then it became widely agreed it would be Tie Me Up Tie Me Down. Then the next batch of announcements what do we get ? Steve Zissou. So until its in print, it could be anything.
Not to mention those clues that support a film that never comes to fruition. Eraserhead anyone?
Since Criterion runs a business that makes money and has many fans willing to spend their money, there will always be those who will prefer certain releases than others. What is annoying is when others get bent out of shape because individuals are merely voicing their opinion. It would be amazing to see any of Lynch's films enter the Collection in Blu Ray format. I respect those with "blinders" who want to see their films released. Its nice to see passion and a little bit of hope.
Cheers to all the Cassavetes fans out there if indeed Love Streams is coming.
- Jeff
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:49 am
- Location: Denver, CO
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 3)
The only reason people initially said "I don't know, maybe Zissou" for that clue was that we already knew that it was in the works. Tie Me Up Tie Me Down was a surprise, but that drawing couldn't represent anything else. Just like Love Streams is a surprise, but that drawing couldn't represent anything else.beastwave wrote:I suppose this newest Newsletter drawing is an "obvious" clue to some, but then again sometimes those so-called "obvious" clues mean nothing. The last newsletter clue was the toy scuba diver, and some people initially thought it was Steve Zissou, then it became widely agreed it would be Tie Me Up Tie Me Down. Then the next batch of announcements what do we get ? Steve Zissou. So until its in print, it could be anything.
Eraserhead was only hinted at in a New Year's clue, it never had a newsletter clue suggesting it was imminent. Criterion still has the rights, they're just waiting on Lynch.beastwave wrote:Not to mention those clues that support a film that never comes to fruition. Eraserhead anyone?
No one is getting "bent out of shape." It's not at all about anyone desperately wanting Criterion editions of Tie Me Up Tie Me Down or Love Streams (though I'm sure there are plenty in both camps). It's just that the monthly mix of annoyance and bemusement that always accompanies silly fantasy guesses has been especially pointed the last two months because the clues are so blatantly clear.
- Shrew
- The Untamed One
- Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 6:22 am
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 3)
Also, the newsletter clues are generally 2-3 months ahead of announcements, not just 1 month. Tie Me Up will probably show up soon.
- colinr0380
- Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 8:30 pm
- Location: Chapel-en-le-Frith, Derbyshire, UK
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 3)
If they ever turn up I've got a great idea for picture clues for Diane Kurys' Cocktail Molotov and Peppermint Soda! (I'll let you in on the secret: one involves a bottle with a rag in it next to a stem glass, and the second involves an individually wrapped sweet propped against a Cola bottle! :-$ )
- lacritfan
- Life is one big kevyip
- Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2007 10:39 pm
- Location: Los Angeles
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 3)
I hope they somehow manage to get Michael Ventura's I'm Almost Not Crazy as an extra. From what I remember the story was they were at Cassavetes' house and Golan Globus wanted to make a behind the scenes documentary and Cassavetes pointed at Ventura and said have him do it. I believe he already knew he was terminal and there were scenes of him by the pool smoking a cigarette thinking about the script, working 'til the end.shaky wrote:LOVE STREAMS
- domino harvey
- Dot Com Dom
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm
- swo17
- Bloodthirsty Butcher
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:25 pm
- Location: SLC, UT
- HistoryProf
- Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 7:48 am
- Location: KCK
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 3)
"wacky3-14a"??
- knives
- Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 10:49 pm
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 3)
I'm sure Dom's right, but damn I hope that Swo is.
- jindianajonz
- Jindiana Jonz Abrams
- Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2011 12:11 am
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 3)
MacBeth seems most likely... but which version?
- ryannichols7
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2012 6:26 pm
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 3)
Polanski. I will be amazed if it's anything else.jindianajonz wrote:MacBeth seems most likely... but which version?
- mfunk9786
- Under Chris' Protection
- Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 8:43 pm
- Location: Miami, FL
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 3)
Is it bad that I have no idea how that picture is leading you to think MacBeth?
- domino harvey
- Dot Com Dom
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 3)
"Out! Out damn spot!"
- solaris72
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 7:03 pm
- Location: Baltimore, MD
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 3)
I'd guess Polanski? I'd prefer Welles' version...Olive's disc looks great, but supplements would be nice.
- knives
- Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 10:49 pm
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 3)
If it's any version it is definitely the Polanski. All the other relevant ones I can think of are tied up with other companies.
- HistoryProf
- Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 7:48 am
- Location: KCK
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 3)
you are not alone. can someone explain how a dog=macbeth?mfunk9786 wrote:Is it bad that I have no idea how that picture is leading you to think MacBeth?
- jedgeco
- Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 3:28 pm
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 3)
The dog has a spot, and "Spot" is a common American dog name.HistoryProf wrote:you are not alone. can someone explain how a dog=macbeth?mfunk9786 wrote:Is it bad that I have no idea how that picture is leading you to think MacBeth?
- domino harvey
- Dot Com Dom
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 3)
Again, the quote from Lady MacBeth is "Out damned spot" (or close to that, I'm on my phone)
- mfunk9786
- Under Chris' Protection
- Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 8:43 pm
- Location: Miami, FL
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 3)
D'oh. Thanks.domino harvey wrote:"Out! Out damn spot!"
- HistoryProf
- Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 7:48 am
- Location: KCK
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 3)
ah....my knowledge is limited to three witches and other major plot points.domino harvey wrote:Again, the quote from Lady MacBeth is "Out damned spot" (or close to that, I'm on my phone)
- HistoryProf
- Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 7:48 am
- Location: KCK
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 3)
Good on them for digging a little this time....
Doctor
26 What is it she does now? Look, how she rubs
27 her hands.
Gentlewoman
It is an accustomed action with her, to seem thus
washing her hands. I have known her continue in
this a quarter of an hour.
LADY MACBETH
Yet here's a spot.
Doctor
Hark! she speaks. I will set down what comes
from her, to satisfy my remembrance the more
strongly.
LADY MACBETH
Out, damned spot! out, I say!—One: two: why,
then, 'tis time to do't.—Hell is murky!—Fie, my
lord, fie! a soldier, and afeard? What need we
fear who knows it, when none can call our power
to account?—Yet who would have thought the old
man to have had so much blood in him?
- knives
- Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 10:49 pm
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 3)
I severely doubt it, but now that I think of it Wadja's Serbian Lady MacBeth should be available. I imagine that they would wait for a restoration on that though.knives wrote:If it's any version it is definitely the Polanski. All the other relevant ones I can think of are tied up with other companies.
- EddieLarkin
- Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2012 2:25 pm
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 3)
Hopefully it'll come paired with a Knife in the Water upgrade (with all the shorts included on the set in HD). His entire output from 57-71 would then be available on Blu-ray (The Fearless Vampire Killers is available in France and coming soon from WAC, last I heard).
-
Jack Phillips
- Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2007 6:33 am
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 3)
There is no upper case "B" in the name. The correct spelling is "Macbeth."domino harvey wrote:MacBeth
