Criterion Newsletter (Part 3)

News on Criterion and Janus Films
Locked
Message
Author
beastwave
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2014 10:07 pm

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 3)

#126 Post by beastwave »

I just find it interesting that Cassavetes is trending so hard right now. With the box set being reissued recently, and some of his films being screened here in Los Angeles, but whatever. Love Streams is a great film, and its cool that its being added to the collection. I would be curious to see what special features it has, and what the box art will look like.

I suppose this newest Newsletter drawing is an "obvious" clue to some, but then again sometimes those so-called "obvious" clues mean nothing. The last newsletter clue was the toy scuba diver, and some people initially thought it was Steve Zissou, then it became widely agreed it would be Tie Me Up Tie Me Down. Then the next batch of announcements what do we get ? Steve Zissou. So until its in print, it could be anything.

Not to mention those clues that support a film that never comes to fruition. Eraserhead anyone?

Since Criterion runs a business that makes money and has many fans willing to spend their money, there will always be those who will prefer certain releases than others. What is annoying is when others get bent out of shape because individuals are merely voicing their opinion. It would be amazing to see any of Lynch's films enter the Collection in Blu Ray format. I respect those with "blinders" who want to see their films released. Its nice to see passion and a little bit of hope.

Cheers to all the Cassavetes fans out there if indeed Love Streams is coming.
User avatar
Jeff
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:49 am
Location: Denver, CO

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 3)

#127 Post by Jeff »

beastwave wrote:I suppose this newest Newsletter drawing is an "obvious" clue to some, but then again sometimes those so-called "obvious" clues mean nothing. The last newsletter clue was the toy scuba diver, and some people initially thought it was Steve Zissou, then it became widely agreed it would be Tie Me Up Tie Me Down. Then the next batch of announcements what do we get ? Steve Zissou. So until its in print, it could be anything.
The only reason people initially said "I don't know, maybe Zissou" for that clue was that we already knew that it was in the works. Tie Me Up Tie Me Down was a surprise, but that drawing couldn't represent anything else. Just like Love Streams is a surprise, but that drawing couldn't represent anything else.
beastwave wrote:Not to mention those clues that support a film that never comes to fruition. Eraserhead anyone?
Eraserhead was only hinted at in a New Year's clue, it never had a newsletter clue suggesting it was imminent. Criterion still has the rights, they're just waiting on Lynch.

No one is getting "bent out of shape." It's not at all about anyone desperately wanting Criterion editions of Tie Me Up Tie Me Down or Love Streams (though I'm sure there are plenty in both camps). It's just that the monthly mix of annoyance and bemusement that always accompanies silly fantasy guesses has been especially pointed the last two months because the clues are so blatantly clear.
User avatar
Shrew
The Untamed One
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 6:22 am

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 3)

#128 Post by Shrew »

Also, the newsletter clues are generally 2-3 months ahead of announcements, not just 1 month. Tie Me Up will probably show up soon.
User avatar
colinr0380
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 8:30 pm
Location: Chapel-en-le-Frith, Derbyshire, UK

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 3)

#129 Post by colinr0380 »

If they ever turn up I've got a great idea for picture clues for Diane Kurys' Cocktail Molotov and Peppermint Soda! (I'll let you in on the secret: one involves a bottle with a rag in it next to a stem glass, and the second involves an individually wrapped sweet propped against a Cola bottle! :-$ )
User avatar
lacritfan
Life is one big kevyip
Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2007 10:39 pm
Location: Los Angeles

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 3)

#130 Post by lacritfan »

shaky wrote:LOVE STREAMS
I hope they somehow manage to get Michael Ventura's I'm Almost Not Crazy as an extra. From what I remember the story was they were at Cassavetes' house and Golan Globus wanted to make a behind the scenes documentary and Cassavetes pointed at Ventura and said have him do it. I believe he already knew he was terminal and there were scenes of him by the pool smoking a cigarette thinking about the script, working 'til the end.
User avatar
HistoryProf
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 7:48 am
Location: KCK

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 3)

#131 Post by HistoryProf »

Image
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 3)

#132 Post by domino harvey »

MacBeth
User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:25 pm
Location: SLC, UT

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 3)

#133 Post by swo17 »

Out 1 :shock:
User avatar
HistoryProf
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 7:48 am
Location: KCK

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 3)

#134 Post by HistoryProf »

"wacky3-14a"??
User avatar
knives
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 10:49 pm

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 3)

#135 Post by knives »

I'm sure Dom's right, but damn I hope that Swo is.
User avatar
jindianajonz
Jindiana Jonz Abrams
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2011 12:11 am

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 3)

#136 Post by jindianajonz »

MacBeth seems most likely... but which version?
User avatar
ryannichols7
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2012 6:26 pm

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 3)

#137 Post by ryannichols7 »

jindianajonz wrote:MacBeth seems most likely... but which version?
Polanski. I will be amazed if it's anything else.
User avatar
mfunk9786
Under Chris' Protection
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 8:43 pm
Location: Miami, FL

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 3)

#138 Post by mfunk9786 »

Is it bad that I have no idea how that picture is leading you to think MacBeth?
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 3)

#139 Post by domino harvey »

"Out! Out damn spot!"
User avatar
solaris72
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 7:03 pm
Location: Baltimore, MD

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 3)

#140 Post by solaris72 »

I'd guess Polanski? I'd prefer Welles' version...Olive's disc looks great, but supplements would be nice.
User avatar
knives
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 10:49 pm

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 3)

#141 Post by knives »

If it's any version it is definitely the Polanski. All the other relevant ones I can think of are tied up with other companies.
User avatar
HistoryProf
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 7:48 am
Location: KCK

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 3)

#142 Post by HistoryProf »

mfunk9786 wrote:Is it bad that I have no idea how that picture is leading you to think MacBeth?
you are not alone. can someone explain how a dog=macbeth?
User avatar
jedgeco
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 3:28 pm

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 3)

#143 Post by jedgeco »

HistoryProf wrote:
mfunk9786 wrote:Is it bad that I have no idea how that picture is leading you to think MacBeth?
you are not alone. can someone explain how a dog=macbeth?
The dog has a spot, and "Spot" is a common American dog name.
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 3)

#144 Post by domino harvey »

Again, the quote from Lady MacBeth is "Out damned spot" (or close to that, I'm on my phone)
User avatar
mfunk9786
Under Chris' Protection
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 8:43 pm
Location: Miami, FL

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 3)

#145 Post by mfunk9786 »

domino harvey wrote:"Out! Out damn spot!"
D'oh. Thanks.
User avatar
HistoryProf
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 7:48 am
Location: KCK

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 3)

#146 Post by HistoryProf »

domino harvey wrote:Again, the quote from Lady MacBeth is "Out damned spot" (or close to that, I'm on my phone)
ah....my knowledge is limited to three witches and other major plot points.
User avatar
HistoryProf
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 7:48 am
Location: KCK

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 3)

#147 Post by HistoryProf »

Good on them for digging a little this time....
Doctor
26 What is it she does now? Look, how she rubs
27 her hands.

Gentlewoman
It is an accustomed action with her, to seem thus
washing her hands. I have known her continue in
this a quarter of an hour.

LADY MACBETH
Yet here's a spot.

Doctor
Hark! she speaks. I will set down what comes
from her, to satisfy my remembrance the more
strongly.

LADY MACBETH
Out, damned spot! out, I say!—One: two: why,
then, 'tis time to do't.—Hell is murky!—Fie, my
lord, fie! a soldier, and afeard? What need we
fear who knows it, when none can call our power
to account?—Yet who would have thought the old
man to have had so much blood in him?
User avatar
knives
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 10:49 pm

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 3)

#148 Post by knives »

knives wrote:If it's any version it is definitely the Polanski. All the other relevant ones I can think of are tied up with other companies.
I severely doubt it, but now that I think of it Wadja's Serbian Lady MacBeth should be available. I imagine that they would wait for a restoration on that though.
User avatar
EddieLarkin
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2012 2:25 pm

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 3)

#149 Post by EddieLarkin »

Hopefully it'll come paired with a Knife in the Water upgrade (with all the shorts included on the set in HD). His entire output from 57-71 would then be available on Blu-ray (The Fearless Vampire Killers is available in France and coming soon from WAC, last I heard).
Jack Phillips
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2007 6:33 am

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 3)

#150 Post by Jack Phillips »

domino harvey wrote:MacBeth
There is no upper case "B" in the name. The correct spelling is "Macbeth."
Locked