Jackasses (Jeff Tremaine, 2002/2006/2010/2022)

Discuss specific films and franchises
Message
Author
User avatar
oldsheperd
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 9:18 pm
Location: Rio Rancho/Albuquerque

Jackasses (Jeff Tremaine, 2002/2006/2010/2022)

#1 Post by oldsheperd »

Jackass 3-D. I was completely in the dark about this movie coming out until I saw the ad on TV last night. All I gotta say is "Hell Yesss!"
User avatar
willoneill
Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 2:10 pm
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Re: Jackass 3-D(Jeff Tremaine)

#2 Post by willoneill »

oldsheperd wrote:Jackass 3-D. I was completely in the dark about this movie coming out until I saw the ad on TV last night. All I gotta say is "Hell Yesss!"
I wholehearted agree. If ever a movie gave me exactly what I paid for, and greatly exceeded my expectations doing so, it was both Jackass films. Can't wait for for 3.

They lose style points for Jackass 2.5, however, which was just a cash grab from material that should have been bonus features on the Jackass 2 dvd.
User avatar
mfunk9786
Under Chris' Protection
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 8:43 pm
Location: Miami, FL

Jackass 3D (Tremaine, 2010)

#3 Post by mfunk9786 »

Trailer

Does it make me a philistine if this is my most anticipated movie of the year? These films are obviously not the recipients of much respect, but I find their guerilla style fascinating: there are stunts that illicit shock, nausea, fear; and in some cases, downright childish wonder. This group has managed to find a tone that would be impossible to duplicate. It's never too dark, it's never too mean, and no one makes any claims that they aren't frightened to do some of the things they do: their fear is right up there on screen beforehand, and their pain or disgust afterward is well documented. It would be no fun to see a film full of manly men performing painful stunts and then telling everyone how they didn't hurt, and they were never scared. The Jackass crew are occasionally visibly shaking in trepidation leading up to particularly dangerous deeds, but they somehow never turn down the opportunity to do them. In fact, some of the most interesting moments in the first two films involve someone coming up with an idea of something particularly painful or traumatic to do to themselves while the rest of the group tries to advise them against doing it. The group never overstay their welcome, there are a ton of stunts crammed into these relatively short films, each split up with a title card and a person announcing what you're about to see - there's no pretension, no dissolves, no impression that they need to do anything for a movie that they wouldn't have done for a TV show or a video they're just shooting to show off to their friends, and that's the charm of this whole enterprise in my opinion.

All that being said, I fully expect to have to close my eyes or turn away at some point. There was a moment involving self-inflicted papercuts in the first film that I still can't watch to this day, and I've never been all that thrilled by scat humor (and am therefore not expecting to make it through the port-a-potty slingshot shown in that trailer). But there is no other film franchise that I've had similar theatrical experiences with: someone vomited into the aisle during my screening of the first film, and someone fainted in their seat during the second. I'm wondering if the addition of the unavoidable 3D quease factor might result in an actual death-by-vulgarity during my much-anticipated screening of the third.

EDIT: Whoops, didn't realize there was already a thread for this one, sorry to the mod that had to sort things out, my search had come up empty.
User avatar
Mr Sausage
Has Risen from the Grave
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 1:02 am
Location: Canada

Re: Jackass 3D (Tremaine, 2010)

#4 Post by Mr Sausage »

I'm not a fan of Jackass, and I doubt I'll ever see the newest movie, but I'll say that I loved the stunt from one of the two films where one of the guys gets the shit beat out of him by a female muay thai fighter. Oddly entertaining to watch an unassuming little Asian girl knock a full-grown man around like he was no more than a child.
User avatar
mfunk9786
Under Chris' Protection
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 8:43 pm
Location: Miami, FL

Re: Jackass 3D (Tremaine, 2010)

#5 Post by mfunk9786 »

That's a great example of why I enjoy these so much. You'll only live once: you're not going to get beaten up by a female muay thai fighter, your friend isn't going to get beaten up by a female muay thai fighter; but these fellows are doing it willingly, to make people laugh no less! And if it's out there, I can't not at least try to watch. It might be strange and juvenile to see Steve-O try to wear a poisonous jellyfish as a hat, but now that I've said that, I can't understand why you wouldn't want to see it.
User avatar
kaujot
Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 10:28 pm
Location: Austin
Contact:

Re: Jackass 3D (Tremaine, 2010)

#6 Post by kaujot »

I'm not in the least bit ashamed to say I spent a pretty big portion of my weekend watching the show on MTV, as well as both movies on Comedy Central (it was after midnight, so they didn't censor anything), the retrospective show (Spike Jonze, Tremaine, and Knoxville just talking about how it came together etc) and then the making of 3D.
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: Jackass 3D (Tremaine, 2010)

#7 Post by domino harvey »

I never saw the first one or much of the series, but Jackass 2 had a real sense of novelty and invention in most of the stunts that I was won over. Can't say it's the kind of thing I would seek out or rewatch, but if someone put this new one in front of me, I would leave the room
User avatar
Mr Sausage
Has Risen from the Grave
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 1:02 am
Location: Canada

Re: Jackass 3D (Tremaine, 2010)

#8 Post by Mr Sausage »

I'll admit these films are bizarrely fascinating, but I'm unlikely to ever go out of my way to see them. Much like I never watched the show on my own, but would happily watch an episode at a friend's house if he insisted I see it. Tho' I would've preferred to go through life without having watched a man make an omelet by swallowing all the ingredients and then vomiting them up into the hot pan for cooking.
User avatar
mfunk9786
Under Chris' Protection
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 8:43 pm
Location: Miami, FL

Re: Jackass 3D (Tremaine, 2010)

#9 Post by mfunk9786 »

Domino, do you mean you wouldn't leave the room? Otherwise your post had quite the twist ending.
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: Jackass 3D (Tremaine, 2010)

#10 Post by domino harvey »

Get out of the house, the call is coming from upstairs
User avatar
Fiery Angel
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 5:59 pm

Re: Jackass 3D (Tremaine, 2010)

#11 Post by Fiery Angel »

domino harvey wrote:Get out of the house, the call is coming from upstairs
spoiler tags, please
David M.
Joined: Sat May 10, 2008 5:10 pm

Re: Jackass 3D (Tremaine, 2010)

#12 Post by David M. »

"Terror Taxi" from the second film is one of the funniest things I've ever seen in a movie.
User avatar
oldsheperd
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 9:18 pm
Location: Rio Rancho/Albuquerque

Re: Jackass 3D (Tremaine, 2010)

#13 Post by oldsheperd »

I have both movies, the series boxset and the unreleased footage dvd. In addition I have all of the Wildboyz dvds which IMO is highly under-rated.
User avatar
oldsheperd
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 9:18 pm
Location: Rio Rancho/Albuquerque

Re: Jackass 3D (Tremaine, 2010)

#14 Post by oldsheperd »

Caught this on Saturday. Altogether pretty good. A lot of stuff was "been there done that". The scene in the bar with all the little people was clever. The Irving Zissman and his granddaughter was creepy and didn't work all that well. I guess this is the last one?
User avatar
LQ
Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2008 11:51 am
Contact:

Re: Jackass 3D (Tremaine, 2010)

#15 Post by LQ »

oldsheperd wrote: I guess this is the last one?
It made 50 million dollars this weekend, so perhaps not.
HarryLong
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2008 4:39 pm
Location: Lebanon, PA

Re: Jackass 3D (Tremaine, 2010)

#16 Post by HarryLong »

According to NPR this morning SOCIAL NETWORK cost $50 million and took in about $20 million its first weekend; JACKASS more or less reversed those numbers...
User avatar
lacritfan
Life is one big kevyip
Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2007 10:39 pm
Location: Los Angeles

Re: Jackass 3D (Tremaine, 2010)

#17 Post by lacritfan »

LQ wrote:
oldsheperd wrote: I guess this is the last one?
It made 50 million dollars this weekend, so perhaps not.
Johnny Knoxville was on Jimmy Fallon and confirmed there will be a 3.5 coming out next year.
User avatar
mfunk9786
Under Chris' Protection
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 8:43 pm
Location: Miami, FL

Re: Jackass 3D (Tremaine, 2010)

#18 Post by mfunk9786 »

That's only a DVD release comprised of outtakes and little new footage.
User avatar
bearcuborg
Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2007 6:30 am
Location: Philadelphia via Chicago

Re: Trailers for Upcoming Films

#19 Post by bearcuborg »

Jackass Fore♥️er

Kinda difficult to not feel that something is lacking. I had no idea Johnny went full Jim Jarmusch.
User avatar
Drucker
Your Future our Drucker
Joined: Wed May 18, 2011 1:37 pm

Re: The Films of 2022

#20 Post by Drucker »

We don't appear to have a Jackass thread, which is a bit disappointing. In anticipation of the new film, a friend has told me I need to see the 3-D version.

Does anyone here have the blu-ray? If so, can you only watch it with Anaglyph glasses? Or does the disc have a 3-d option that can be used with 3d glasses that come with the TV?
User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:25 pm
Location: SLC, UT

Re: The Films of 2022

#21 Post by swo17 »

Briefly looking into it, it would appear that the 2011 Blu-ray release is unfortunately not on 3D Blu-ray, and the only way to watch it in 3D is on the DVD with anaglyph glasses
Mark L.
Joined: Sat Apr 12, 2014 9:05 am

Re: The Films of 2022

#22 Post by Mark L. »

If you’re in New York City, there’s a free 3D showing at the Museum of Moving Image at around 5 today!
User avatar
knives
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 10:49 pm

Re: The Films of 2022

#23 Post by knives »

Hang out with new wife or go to see Jackass for free. Life is full of tough decisions.
User avatar
Finch
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 9:09 pm
Location: United States

Re: The Films of 2022

#24 Post by Finch »

What about taking her to the movie? I'm sure there's far worse movies to take the wife to than Jackass Forever.
User avatar
DarkImbecile
Ask me about my visible cat breasts
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:24 pm
Location: Albuquerque, NM

Re: Jackasses (Jeff Tremaine, 2002/2006/2010/2022)

#25 Post by DarkImbecile »

mfunk9786 wrote: Mon Oct 11, 2010 7:34 pm This group has managed to find a tone that would be impossible to duplicate. It's never too dark, it's never too mean, and no one makes any claims that they aren't frightened to do some of the things they do: their fear is right up there on screen beforehand, and their pain or disgust afterward is well documented. It would be no fun to see a film full of manly men performing painful stunts and then telling everyone how they didn't hurt, and they were never scared. The Jackass crew are occasionally visibly shaking in trepidation leading up to particularly dangerous deeds, but they somehow never turn down the opportunity to do them.
...
All that being said, I fully expect to have to close my eyes or turn away at some point. There was a moment involving self-inflicted papercuts in the first film that I still can't watch to this day, and I've never been all that thrilled by scat humor (and am therefore not expecting to make it through the port-a-potty slingshot shown in that trailer). But there is no other film franchise that I've had similar theatrical experiences with: someone vomited into the aisle during my screening of the first film, and someone fainted in their seat during the second.
Jackass Forever was quite fun, especially with a fairly packed midnight Thursday preview crowd who were fully invested but still appropriately horrified in the right moments. This entry features at least two of the most inspired bits in the entire franchise, and like the others felt both unending while you're in the middle and too short when the credits start to roll.

To expand on mfunk's first point above, the unabashedly juvenile, fascinatingly machismo-free humanity on display is only made deeper and more involving in the fourth installment by the repeated acknowledgement of the cast's age and the damage they've endured. Knoxville's silver hair and various members' missing teeth, limbs in slings, and diminished capacity to recover from being brutalized (physically and psychologically) by their stunts make their camaraderie and affection for each other all the more charming, and the admiration bestowed upon them by the appropriately masochistic new cast members all the more bittersweet.

That said, as to mfunk's second point, the real tightrope in making it through these movies is awaiting the moments you're not sure if you'll be able to watch, and man does Forever deliver on that front: I didn't think it could get worse than a skit involving a heavyweight MMA fighter, but that bit escalated multiple times until a pogo stick was brought out, which was the scariest thing I've seen in a theater in quite some time. If it makes anyone more inclined to risk a viewing, there's less of the scatological humor in this entry, though far more penises and scrotums than in any prior entry, in addition to gallons of pig semen.

My single favorite bit, though — up there with Beehive Tetherball, Slip'n'Bowl and Electric Avenue — is called "Silence of the Lambs":
Spoiler
After setting up a bit where Knoxville will be interacting with a giant western diamondback rattlesnake with the other guys as audience members, he and the crew lock the door, turn off the lights, and don night-vision goggles. They pretend to release the snake into the room before torturing their buddies with stun guns, trash can lids, and frying pans, before herding them toward an unlocked door that opens onto a room packed with more traps. The psychological effect of this horror show on a couple of the guys is both understandable and remarkable.
Post Reply