88 Films

Vinegar Syndrome, Deaf Crocodile, Imprint, Kino, and more
Post Reply
Message
Author
beamish14
Joined: Fri May 18, 2018 7:07 pm

Re: 88 Films

#426 Post by beamish14 »

dwk wrote: Thu Oct 13, 2022 4:59 pm VS has expressed a willingness to release Clownhouse. So I could see them working with Bey Logan.

I’d be amazed if MGM ever licensed that title to a label
Marlew
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2021 6:32 am

Re: 88 Films

#427 Post by Marlew »

Glad to see a principled response from these 88 collaborators. OPY is by far the biggest loss and I feel for him, he's done a lot of fantastic work under significant stress. Hope he can find a new welcoming home.
User avatar
What A Disgrace
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 2:34 am
Contact:

Re: 88 Films

#428 Post by What A Disgrace »

Could someone just convince David Kalat and Tim Lucas to be kung fu movie fans? I'm pretty sure they are relatively wholesome.
User avatar
dwk
Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2010 10:10 pm

Re: 88 Films

#429 Post by dwk »

beamish14 wrote: Thu Oct 13, 2022 5:51 pm I’d be amazed if MGM ever licensed that title to a label
You are right, there is no chance MGM ever lets that out of the vault.
User avatar
The Elegant Dandy Fop
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 7:25 am
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Re: 88 Films

#430 Post by The Elegant Dandy Fop »

yoloswegmaster wrote: Thu Oct 13, 2022 5:37 pm 1. Mike Leeder is just your average creepy sexpat who is strangely pro-CCP and against the HK protests, whereas Bey Logan was Harvey Weinstein's right-hand man and has been accused of sexual harassment by 7 different women.

2. No charges or convictions against Logan but I would imagine that it would be tough to get a conviction out of it, especially after a long period of time.

3. Leeder just pretends nothing has happened and has cleaned his social media feed up. Bey Logan on the other hand....
I believe I mentioned the CCP thing in a previous post. He makes it very clear he's on the side of the Chinese government during a few of his commentaries, but again, those are his political beliefs. If you choose to disagree with him, that's fine. It's not something that particularly bothers me as I engage with all sorts of media made by people whose belifs are antithetical to mine. And the sex worker thing too strikes me as an odd thing to pit against him. He's been in Hong Kong for what sounds like decades and doesn't just strike me as a sex tourist. There's this strong desire to legitimize and accept sex work, but then here people are shaming him about being a customer. I'm not even a big Mike Leeder fan, but neither of these things bother me much. Chris Doyle sounded girl crazy back in the day, but no one has come after him.

Regardless, Bey Logan sounds like a creep and an asshole on top of all that. I was never a big fan of his work and not sure what sort of connections he holds in the Hong Kong cinema world that would allow a label like 88 Films to fumble this badly. His commentaries were mostly just trivia lists and 88 Films burned themselves for that.
Glowingwabbit
Joined: Wed May 01, 2013 5:27 pm

Re: 88 Films

#431 Post by Glowingwabbit »

Vinegar Syndrome posted the following on twitter:
Some customers have been asking whether Bey Logan was involved with some of our recent releases. While two of our discs contain archival material that was present on previous Dragon Dynasty editions, we can confirm that we have not partnered with Mr. Logan on any of our releases.
User avatar
Maltic
Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2020 5:36 am

Re: 88 Films

#432 Post by Maltic »

The Elegant Dandy Fop wrote: Thu Oct 13, 2022 7:17 pm
I believe I mentioned the CCP thing in a previous post. He makes it very clear he's on the side of the Chinese government during a few of his commentaries, but again, those are his political beliefs. If you choose to disagree with him, that's fine. It's not something that particularly bothers me as I engage with all sorts of media made by people whose belifs are antithetical to mine.
Leeder is in "good" company there, with Jackie himself.

.. and btw what is Tsui Hark up to these days?
Glowingwabbit
Joined: Wed May 01, 2013 5:27 pm

Re: 88 Films

#433 Post by Glowingwabbit »

Orlac wrote: Thu Oct 13, 2022 3:19 pm
yoloswegmaster wrote: Thu Oct 13, 2022 2:35 pm Mike Leeder and Arne Venema won't be working with 88 anymore, though admittedly I don't believe that is too much of a loss considering Mike Leeder's sketchy past. However, it looks like OldPangYau might also not be involved with anymore future releases. This would be more of a devastating loss since he was a key component of these HK releases thanks to his work on finding better audio sources and alternate cuts (as well as creating excellent hybrid cuts).
OldPangYau is far and away the biggest loss from all this. His commentaries were superb.
OldPangYau is out.

https://twitter.com/OldPangYau/status/1 ... UEipNRErZQ
User avatar
zedz
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 11:24 pm

Re: 88 Films

#434 Post by zedz »

Orlac wrote: Thu Oct 13, 2022 7:23 am I'm surprised 88 decided to resume hiring him at this stage, unless they had assumed the dust had settled and didn't check his Twitter first?
The "suck it up, snowflakes" tone of their statement about the matter suggests they knew exactly what they were doing and wanted to score some imaginary points on the front lines of the culture wars.
Orlac
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 8:29 am

Re: 88 Films

#435 Post by Orlac »

zedz wrote: Thu Oct 13, 2022 8:48 pm
Orlac wrote: Thu Oct 13, 2022 7:23 am I'm surprised 88 decided to resume hiring him at this stage, unless they had assumed the dust had settled and didn't check his Twitter first?
The "suck it up, snowflakes" tone of their statement about the matter suggests they knew exactly what they were doing and wanted to score some imaginary points on the front lines of the culture wars.
To be fair, I don't think that was them, just another one of their contributors.
User avatar
ryannichols7
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2012 6:26 pm

Re: 88 Films

#436 Post by ryannichols7 »

Orlac wrote: Thu Oct 13, 2022 9:12 pm
zedz wrote: Thu Oct 13, 2022 8:48 pm
Orlac wrote: Thu Oct 13, 2022 7:23 am I'm surprised 88 decided to resume hiring him at this stage, unless they had assumed the dust had settled and didn't check his Twitter first?
The "suck it up, snowflakes" tone of their statement about the matter suggests they knew exactly what they were doing and wanted to score some imaginary points on the front lines of the culture wars.
To be fair, I don't think that was them, just another one of their contributors.
it was really disappointingly Irongod, who has been a big time contributor to all these HK releases across each label, even Criterion.

it has been said elsewhere but my issues with Leeder being a creep are moreso in the fact of how unapologetic he is about it. have a burner account dude! I'm sure there's some other celeb or scholar or something that I like who does similar things, but as long as I don't have to know about it.

this isn't my lane of cinema as much as it is others but as far as scholars I didn't know about previously (cause obviously I love Tony Rayns), I appreciate Brandon Bentley and Frank Djeng. both are fairly unproblematic and knowledgeable in my experience. I know Djeng can sometimes be a little more of a "trivia track" guy but he has an infectious enthusiasm, reminds me of Bruce Eder a bit.
User avatar
zedz
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 11:24 pm

Re: 88 Films

#437 Post by zedz »

Orlac wrote: Thu Oct 13, 2022 9:12 pm
zedz wrote: Thu Oct 13, 2022 8:48 pm
Orlac wrote: Thu Oct 13, 2022 7:23 am I'm surprised 88 decided to resume hiring him at this stage, unless they had assumed the dust had settled and didn't check his Twitter first?
The "suck it up, snowflakes" tone of their statement about the matter suggests they knew exactly what they were doing and wanted to score some imaginary points on the front lines of the culture wars.
To be fair, I don't think that was them, just another one of their contributors.
I had no idea who this Irongod character was and assumed he was speaking on behalf of the company. So they haven't made any statement?
Glowingwabbit
Joined: Wed May 01, 2013 5:27 pm

Re: 88 Films

#438 Post by Glowingwabbit »

zedz wrote: Thu Oct 13, 2022 8:48 pm I had no idea who this Irongod character was and assumed he was speaking on behalf of the company. So they haven't made any statement?
I mean at this point what kind of statement can they even make? I assume it will be radio silence on this and they won't acknowledge it. They haven't tweeted anything today and Facebook has just been a post about their Dragons Forever check discs arriving.
User avatar
Finch
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 9:09 pm
Location: United States

Re: 88 Films

#439 Post by Finch »

No release date but confirmed for the US:

Image
User avatar
Finch
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 9:09 pm
Location: United States

Re: 88 Films

#440 Post by Finch »

And the two horror titles for the UK in the first quarter of 2023:

Image
User avatar
Finch
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 9:09 pm
Location: United States

Re: 88 Films

#441 Post by Finch »

Last not least a Twitter statement on Bey Logan from 88:
Glowingwabbit
Joined: Wed May 01, 2013 5:27 pm

Re: 88 Films

#442 Post by Glowingwabbit »

Finch wrote: Fri Oct 14, 2022 3:52 pm Last not least a Twitter statement on Bey Logan from 88:
I was wrong. 88 managed to do a half-assed statement and advertisement for new releases all in one tweet.
User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:25 pm
Location: SLC, UT

Re: 88 Films

#443 Post by swo17 »

I mean, they are dropping him though
Glowingwabbit
Joined: Wed May 01, 2013 5:27 pm

Re: 88 Films

#444 Post by Glowingwabbit »

swo17 wrote: Fri Oct 14, 2022 4:14 pm I mean, they are dropping him though
I mean yeah but the response is totally disingenuous. They were totally willing to work with someone like Logan until most of their regular contributors bailed and they realized they'd take a financial hit. Even with him gone they've lost any goodwill they might have had.
User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:25 pm
Location: SLC, UT

Re: 88 Films

#445 Post by swo17 »

Eh, I'm willing to take their statement at face value. "We genuinely just wanted to make the releases better and more extras packed and that blinded our judgement, we messed up and now we'll do our best to make it right." They're dropping him. They're dropping the extras. They can't change that they started working with him or the fact that they learned the hard way that this would cost them sales and collaborators. But given where we are now, what more could they have done to address the situation? Not do so in conjunction with an announcement of Zombi Holocaust? Perhaps
User avatar
therewillbeblus
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2015 7:40 pm

Re: 88 Films

#446 Post by therewillbeblus »

It's a strangely written response that does read as shrugging off the validity of concerns for the bulk of it, though I do believe they were "genuinely" prioritizing the artistic value of supplemental material over sociopolitical concerns, as they say. Whether or not others agree with that ethos of prioritization is fair game, but do people really think they were intending to make a political statement rather than blindly inviting people to do extras without caring about/considering the social consciousness? Either way, it's not a good look, but there's a difference
Orlac
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 8:29 am

Re: 88 Films

#447 Post by Orlac »

The very first DVD I bought, Fist of Fury, had a Logan commentary...in which he joked one of the extras was a young Steve Martin. Next thing you know that's all over the Internet as a "fact"
User avatar
The Fanciful Norwegian
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 6:24 pm
Location: Teegeeack

Re: 88 Films

#448 Post by The Fanciful Norwegian »

Maltic wrote: Thu Oct 13, 2022 8:26 pm .. and btw what is Tsui Hark up to these days?
He was one of the three co-directors (along with Chen Kaige and Dante Lam) on last year's Korean War extravaganza The Battle of Lake Changjin (i.e., Chosin Reservoir). The same three are credited for this year's sequel, but Tsui directed about 90% of it. He also directed one of the better segments of the perhaps inevitably underwhelming omnibus Septet, a mostly amusing comedy bit about a near-future mental institution where the patients (and doctors?) all claim to be famous HK film figures.
User avatar
Mr Sausage
Has Risen from the Grave
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 1:02 am
Location: Canada

Re: 88 Films

#449 Post by Mr Sausage »

Where did you find out who directed what in Battle of Lake Changjin? The second part of the film definitely had more of Tsui's touch to it, even if it was just endless battle scenes.
User avatar
Computer Raheem
Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2021 11:45 pm

Re: 88 Films

#450 Post by Computer Raheem »

As this situation comes to a close, all I can feel afterwards is a sense of disappointment that it even occurred to begin with. I understand the idea of having a robust, well-curated series of extras (especially for an area of cinema crawling with self-proclaimed "experts" that are nothing more than glorified fanboys), but the risks of hiring such a toxic and genuinely loathsome figure like Logan should have conceivably outweighed the potential benefits. If their response is to be take at face value (and I don't think anyone's kidding themselves as to why 88 released this statement), it makes them look irresponsible in the face of public opinion. How did they think this would go over? Either they're stupid or they genuinely thought this would go over with zero consequences (giving the responses from most of the home video communities, not to mention their collaborators, I can't image them thinking that idiotically). The worst outcome is that 88 was trying to make some sort of "statement" by working with him - Irongod2112's maddening response, though not something that should be seen as indicative of what 88 was thinking, doesn't exactly help in this regard with what zedz accurately described as a "suck it up, snowflakes" attitude. Either way, this only makes me want to avoid their product going forward, which sucks considering the titles they've acquired.
Post Reply