The Invite (Olivia Wilde, 2026)

Discuss specific films and franchises
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
Never Cursed
Such is life on board the Redoutable
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2016 4:22 am

The Invite (Olivia Wilde, 2026)

#1 Post by Never Cursed »

The Invite: Millennial Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf?. Didn't quiiiiite work for me, but Wilde's best movie by far, and the first of her films to have properly restrained performances and a level of social commentary relatively commensurate to the broad, silly premises to which she appears to be drawn (i.e., the first of her movies to feel like it was directed by a director). It might have even been good if Wilde was willing to equate the shortcomings and failures of all four characters and their contributions to their dysfunctional relationships, but she unfortunately makes the serious error of allowing one of them to just...be right,
Spoiler
and to stop the movie at its climax to underline the others' failings in monologue. This isn't the fault of Penélope Cruz, who walks away with the film long before she explains why Rogen and Wilde's marriage is over, but it dislodges the film from its already shaky foundation (an infidelity comedy that won't let its protagonists cheat even when given license, a slow boil towards the revelation of secrets where most of the characters lack discretion or a filter) and makes its message too textual, too bluntly stated, too obvious.
Norton and Rogen are game performers (even if Norton's character gradually becomes irrelevant to the action and is given the classic compensation of a late-game tangent), but I rankled at the repeated nods to Rogen's schlubbiness ("just to be clear, you want to have sex with me?!?!?") in a movie that otherwise positioned itself as being a little more sophisticated than those kinds of dumb appeals. The weak link among the actors is actually Wilde herself, whose decision to portray her character as a nagging, mannered neurotic is somehow hammier and more tropey than Rogen's overflowing hostility towards his guests.

The movie is also blocked and edited with surprising indifference (or "efficiency," I guess) for a movie that could have benefitted from showiness and meaningful interaction. Whatever actors'-workshop qualities the material contains are undone by Wilde's insistence on filming much of the movie in claustrophobic individual close-ups. Not much of this film about the desperate struggle for intimacy from one's intimate partner contains two people interacting in the same shot; charged conversations are frequently relegated to easy shot-reverse-shots or actors talking to their partners' reflections in mirrors. I think it would have been more interesting to see the actors work through this material in more static, "play-like" master shots than constantly cutting between center-framed reactions and interjections.
Spoiler
One of the worst offenders along these lines is the final scene, where Wilde has set up a nice, aesthetically pleasing shot (a gradual zoom in on her and Rogen sharing a moment of intimacy at a piano) and clearly filmed multiple takes all the way through, but where a number of redundant close-ups of the two (and their hand doubles, I guess) have been inserted. Why do this? It ruins a natural and cinematic emotional build-up in favor of purposelessly jerking us between distance and closeness.
I wish Wilde had been confident enough in this shot to let it play uninterrupted - of all the creative choices she's made, why walk over this one? Hopefully her ability to at least create the right kind of images, if not to present them in the right order, portends that she has a good movie in her that will someday manifest (though given that her next projects are apparently a superhero movie and a "holiday movie" from the scribe of Booksmart and Don't Worry Darling, it may not be the next one), but this isn't quite it.
User avatar
therewillbeblus
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2015 7:40 pm

Re: The Films of 2026

#2 Post by therewillbeblus »

Never Cursed wrote: Mon Jul 20, 2026 3:26 am The Invite

It might have even been good if Wilde was willing to equate the shortcomings and failures of all four characters and their contributions to their dysfunctional relationships, but she unfortunately makes the serious error of allowing one of them to just...be right,
Spoiler
and to stop the movie at its climax to underline the others' failings in monologue. This isn't the fault of Penélope Cruz, who walks away with the film long before she explains why Rogen and Wilde's marriage is over, but it dislodges the film from its already shaky foundation (an infidelity comedy that won't let its protagonists cheat even when given license, a slow boil towards the revelation of secrets where most of the characters lack discretion or a filter) and makes its message too textual, too bluntly stated, too obvious.
I thought this the first time I saw the movie too, but watched it again tonight with my wife and had a revelation about the end that made me view it in a different light:
Spoiler
While Cruz absolutely breaks down the other relationship's problems (which is the primary focus of the story, honestly, as Cruz and Norton are mostly there to reflect insecurities and grievances mounted, and it should be treated with more weight than the other dynamic), there's a wonderful moment slid into the climax where Cruz and Norton's relationship shows problems as well. Cruz has an oversized reaction to Norton's correction of her English and it spirals quickly. This is peanuts next to what we see from Rogen and Wilde, but it's important to remember that Cruz and Norton are merely one year into their relationship, and while they have "experience" in other marriages, etc. that doesn't elevate them beyond repair. This could be the start of something that grows, or not. Cruz' message is that we can always have a "restart" - cue from the beginning of the movie when Wilde uses a podcast tip to helpfully de-escalate a fight, which is arguably one of two moments (the other being Cruz' prompt) that actually contribute to repair and harmony amongst the couple, even if just briefly, and not coincidentally coming from other resources. So it seems to me that Cruz and Norton have just as good/bad odds at leaning into the dysfunction of Rogen and Wilde with time. They need aid from other resources too, and who knows what they are. Just because Cruz can give advice doesn't mean she can supply enough of her own to save her relationship.

Cruz gets to be the voice of reason at the end because she plays into a power differential as the 'therapist', but that sly inclusion of a spat between her and Norton, that's not really 'repaired' in the moment in a therapeutic way, is critical to not seeing them as a superior dynamic to Wilde and Rogen's - who seem inferior simply because they're the most wounded and vulnerable at this (significantly later) stage of their relationship
User avatar
Never Cursed
Such is life on board the Redoutable
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2016 4:22 am

Re: The Films of 2026

#3 Post by Never Cursed »

therewillbeblus wrote: Fri Aug 21, 2026 2:09 am watched it tonight with my wife
A bold move!
Spoiler
A good point (and more along the lines of that outburst would have been welcome, as Cruz clearly understood exactly who this character was more than any of the other actors - I wonder if that's because of her presumed greater familiarity with the source material) but I still think Cruz is too correct in this moment, and that tugging on this thread further might have made the final sequence feel less preachy. The important line is the one you highlight (the one about having only so many chances to get a relationship right in life), but she kept hammering home the sources of their dysfunction in a way that I don't think a stranger could access. You would know more about this than I, but there's sometimes a danger with therapeutic voices of moral authority in films where they're able to diagnose their subjects too quickly because the point of the characters is to deliver a message (I think you made this same point about the Euphoria special episode with Jules, where it ironically didn't bother me because I saw the therapist as a device giving us a way into Schafer's character's introspection - i.e., it couldn't have been didactic, as the whole thing was a monologue anyway). I just couldn't believe the confidence and accuracy of Cruz's read on their relationship dynamic after about 90 minutes with Rogen and Wilde (during which she's anything but a neutral, objective observer). It isn't so much that I think her relationship with Norton is better (though as a spectator I'm sure they're happier than Rogen and Wilde) as it is that I resented how quickly she came to her conclusions for no other reason than the movie needs her to do so to have a climax. I guess what I'm trying to say is that the film felt clunky and exposed its narrative construction at a time when it should have felt as natural and emotional as possible.
User avatar
therewillbeblus
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2015 7:40 pm

Re: The Films of 2026

#4 Post by therewillbeblus »

I think Cruz gleaned enough information to make her formulation from what we all witnessed objectively throughout the evening, so I didn't think she came to any contrived conclusions. If anything, you could blame the script for giving away so much information for her to reach that point throughout the film, but it's all for entertainment (and not exactly an 'inaccurate' depiction of a dysfunctional relationship playing out in real time) so what would be the point of that?
Never Cursed wrote: Fri Aug 21, 2026 2:46 am
therewillbeblus wrote: Fri Aug 21, 2026 2:09 am watched it tonight with my wife
A bold move!
I thought so too, but she absolutely loved it! When it was over, she said, "That's it? We could get two more hours." I have no idea what to make of that
User avatar
Soy Cuba
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2023 12:36 pm

Re: The Films of 2026

#5 Post by Soy Cuba »

Re: The Invite: I've seen the original Spanish film that was the first adaptation. But I have not seen The Invite.

Anybody seen them both and can compare?
User avatar
Lowry_Sam
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2010 7:35 pm
Location: San Francisco, CA

Re: The Films of 2026

#6 Post by Lowry_Sam »

Looks like there's several remakes:

Sentimental/The People Upstairs 2020 Spain
Vicini di Casa 2022 Italy
Die Nachbarn Von Oben 2023 Switzerland
Et plus si affinités/Maybe More 2024 France
Neprilichnye gosti 2024 Russia
V dobrém i zlém 2024 Czech Republic
Witjip saramdeul/The People Upstairs 2025 Korea
The Invite 2026 United States
Last edited by Lowry_Sam on Fri Sep 04, 2026 5:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Forrest Taft
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 12:34 am
Location: Stavanger, Norway

Re: The Films of 2026

#7 Post by Forrest Taft »

Wasn't aware this was a remake. Reminds me of Paoulo Genovese's 2016 Perfetti sconosciuti, a movie that has been remade 29 times so far, mostly in Europe (including a Spanish version from Alex de la Iglesia). That's also a story about friends gathering for dinner. I remember seeing the trailer for the Norwegian version a few times, thinking it was not for me. But the fact that it is one of many remakes has made me curious. Not I'm also curious about The Invite.
User avatar
Lowry_Sam
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2010 7:35 pm
Location: San Francisco, CA

Re: The Films of 2026

#8 Post by Lowry_Sam »

and before that there was the French dinner movie, Le Dîner de Cons, but it looking it up it hasn't been remade as much as I thought, at least not many that actually credit the writer.
Post Reply